Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

You and the charity now intend to terminate the joint venture as you are required to extinguish your caveat on the title of the land to enable the charity to procure necessary finances to fund construction of additional residential units on the land to enable it to provide accommodation to its clients;

The agreement expressly states that nothing contained in the agreement shall be deemed or interpreted to create a partnership, association or agency;

You do not hold a joint bank account with the charity and your rights and obligations under the agreement are neither joint nor joint and several;

Management of the accommodation was to be carried out solely by the charity;

Your interest in this project will end once the equitable interest is transferred to the charity;

You have previously received a private ruling from the ATO, which held that the provision of an equitable interest in land is not a supply of real property for GST purposes and is therefore not subject to GST;

In support of this current private ruling application, your tax consultant, makes the following contentions on your behalf:

A copy of the JV agreement between you and the charity was provided in support of this application. The relevant terms are summarised below:

Relevant legislative provisions

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 section 9-5

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 section 9-10

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 section 40-35

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 section 40-65

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 section 40-75

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 section 195-1

Reasons for decision

An entity is liable for GST on any taxable supplies that it makes.

Section 9-5 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act) provides that you make a taxable supply if:

However the supply is not taxable to the extent that it is GST-free or input taxed.

The term 'supply' is broadly defined in section 9-10 of the GST Act. In this case, it is relevant to consider whether you are making a supply in the form of:

'Real property' is defined in section 195-1 of the GST Act to include:

The issue to be considered in this case is whether you are making a supply (more specifically a taxable supply) when you transfer your interest in the property to the charity.

In determining this, we will firstly consider the terms of the arrangements between the parties and the interests held by the respective parties in relation to the joint venture.

The terms of the arrangement between you and the charity were outlined in a written agreement referred to as a 'joint venture agreement' (the Agreement) entered into prior to 1 July 2000.

The Agreement describes the association between the parties as being for the purpose of designing, erecting, constructing, maintaining and managing upon the Land a number of housing units for use as rental accommodation for eligible clients.

According to the Agreement, you were to contribute towards the capital cost of the project (as specified in item X of the Schedule) and the charity was to contribute the value of the land and a monetary contribution towards the cost of the development of the land. The Agreement specifies that nothing in the Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership, association, or agency arrangement.

From the facts provided, we agree that the parties are not in a partnership (neither at general law or tax law), nor is there an agency arrangement.

While the Agreement acknowledges that the legal title to the property was held (and continued to be held) by the charity, it provides that the parties respective interests in the land and the development was to be held by the charity on trust for both parties.

Relevantly, the Agreement provides that pending registration of the transfer to you of your share in the land the charity shall remain the registered proprietor of the land and holds and shall continue to hold the land upon trust for itself and you as tenants in common in respective undivided fractional shares.

The Agreement further provides that subject to any agreement to extend or renew the agreement, the charity shall purchase your entire estate or interest free of encumbrances in the Land and the Project at the current market value of that estate or interest (as at the date of exercise of that option). Within X days after the determination of the current market value, the charity was to prepare and submit to you for execution a deed of assignment of its interest in the project.

Your tax consultant advised that despite the terms included in the written agreement, it was never the intention of the parties for you to hold any legal interest in the property which is evidenced by the fact that you lodged a caveat over the land. They submit that if you had intended to register your legal interest in the property and operate under a tenants-in-common arrangement, then you would not have needed to lodge a caveat.

Your tax consultant considers that the equitable interest in the land assigned to you does not give rise or extend to ownership of the land but merely arises out of various rights and obligations established between the parties entering into the JV agreement. They submit that the removal of the caveat over the land is merely ancillary to the overall aim of the agreement between the parties for the provision of accommodation to the specified clients and the fact that the Agreement confers upon you the right to acquire a legal interest in the property has no bearing on the current scenario as that right was not exercised. On this basis they conclude that you are not making a taxable supply when you dispose of your equitable interest in the property.

In response, we provide the following comments.

The definition of 'real property' includes 'any interest in or right over land'. The definition is not limited to the supply of legal interests in land. It follows that a supply of premises can include a supply that is only a part interest in real property.

Further, there is nothing in the GST Act requiring legal title to the assets of an enterprise to be held or dealt with by the entity carrying on the enterprise in order for taxable supplies of assets to be made.

In this case, despite the fact that the legal title to the land is held by the charity, you obtained rights in relation to the property that go beyond merely a 'security' (in the form of a caveat) that limits the charity from dealing with the property without recognition of the rights held by you. [The circumstances of this case can be distinguished from that where a financier, or mortgagor registers its interest in the title of the land.]

We agree that the caveat is merely the mechanism that registered your rights under the JV arrangement. We also agree that the removal of the caveat is not the 'thing' being supplied by you to the charity.

However, the agreement between you and the charity provides you with equitable, contractual (and legal interests) in the property equivalent to a X% interest. The charity holds the remaining X% interest.

The fact that the legal title is held in the name of the charity does not preclude you from having an interest (whether described as a beneficial or legal interest) in the property. Your tax consultant submits that the fact that the agreement confers upon you the right to acquire a legal interest in the property has no bearing on the current scenario as that right was not exercised by you.

We agree that it is not relevant that you did not exercise your right to have legal title transferred to you relevant to your interest in the property. We acknowledge that it is necessary to consider the transaction that occurs, rather than a transaction that might have occurred. [As outlined in 'Proposition 10' in Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2006/9 'supplies'.]

However, we consider that the relevant transaction that occurs is the supply of your interest in the land (and any improvements on the land) to the charity.

Your tax consultant submits that the fact that the parties have entered into a standard land contract for the sale of land does not change the treatment of the equitable interest. In support, they refer to paragraph 34 of Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2000/28.

In response, in the context of GSTR 2000/28, the reference to the entry into contractual rights concerning the property not being the 'main supply' is in relation to the sale of real property where the sale involves the transfer of both the juristic rights and the physical land. It confirms that in such cases it is not appropriate to artificially dissect the associated rights from the land that is supplied under a standard land contract. It should be noted that paragraph 34 also recognises that rights or obligations can be the 'thing' supplied where payment is made to secure those rights. We agree that in this case the 'standard land contract' of itself is irrelevant to the issue at hand. However, we consider that in these circumstances the rights held (which are being supplied by you) go beyond merely defining the terms of the arrangement. In this case, it is the relevant thing that is supplied by you, for which the charity has agreed to pay a specified amount.

The factual circumstances confirm that in order to gain unrestricted access to the property the charity must acquire all of the interests held by you relevant to the property. We consider that materially, while the charity holds legal title to the land, it does not hold a 100% interest in the land. It holds title to the property in its own name but on trust for both parties. This does not equate to the charity having full ownership of the land and buildings in its own right. Rather, the charity has one part interest and you the other. To the extent of the X% interest, it must deal with the property as trustee for you.

Your tax consultant submits that there has never been any intention for you to acquire a legal interest in the property. In our opinion, the trust relationship created under the Agreement and the terms of that agreement go to supporting this very intention. That is, that you would hold a X% interest in the property.

As the title is held by the charity on trust for you, from the charity's perspective, it only holds a X% equitable interest in the property (despite holding full legal title). As a consequence, it cannot deal with the property other than in a way set out in its agreement with you. This is further supported by clause X in the Agreement which confirms that the charity 'charges in favour of' you, 'all its right title and interest in the land and the units'.

Your tax consultant further submits that if you had intended to register your legal interest as a tenant in common then you would not have had to lodge a caveat. As previously stated, the caveat is merely the mechanism to register your interest in the property to secure the equitable, beneficial and legal rights that you held. The lodgement of the caveat is evidence of the existence of those rights.

The interest held by you is of value given that it can call upon the charity to provide you with legal title (in order that you may deal with your interest in the property by way of sale). The fact that you did not, or decided not to, enforce legal title to be provided is not relevant to the overall interests held in the property.

The parties have agreed that the property would become wholly that of the charity. However, in order for this to occur, you are required to surrender your interests in the property. This is a real and valuable interest representing approximately X% of the physical property via the trustee (in the form of the charity).

The charity has agreed to pay an amount to obtain from you, your interests in the property. The charity is paying for more than the mere removal of the caveat and the restrictions that it represents on the dealings with the property. Rather, the charity's payment to you represents consideration for your supply of your interest in the property, including the beneficial interest held in trust together with your enforceable rights under the agreement to have legal title in the property provided to you. The supply involves the supply of rights of physical and legal possession of the premises and land that was the X% held by you. In acquiring your interest, the charity acquires something of value as it can now undertake an expanded operation in relation to the property.

For the reasons outlined, we consider that the supply made by you of your interest in the property, to the charity is a supply of 'real property'. The supply is made for consideration equal to the amount provided by the charity to acquire those rights. The fact that the parties have agreed to determine the price on the basis of the market value of the improvements is a contractual matter and does not go to defining the supply.

As all of the requirements of section 9-5 of the GST Act are met, you will be making a taxable supply when you supply your interest in the property to the charity, except to the extent (if any) that the supply is input taxed.

Subsection 40-65(1) of the GST Act provides that a sale of real property is input taxed, but only to the extent that the property is residential premises to be used predominantly for residential accommodation (regardless of the term of occupation).

However, subsection 40-65(2) provides that the sale is not input taxed to the extent that the residential premises are:

The premises are not commercial residential premises and you advised that the premises were completed and ready for occupation from early1990s. On the understanding that the premises have been used only for making input taxed supplies of residential rent for at least five consecutive years, then the premises will not be 'new residential premises' (as defined in section 40-75 of the GST Act). It follows that you will be making an input taxed supply when you dispose of your interest in the residential premises (property) to the charity.

Additional information:

In support of this private ruling application, your tax consultant referred to a previous private ruling issued to you on a similar matter.

We have considered the circumstances of each case and advise that there are material factual differences that distinguish the decision made in that ruling from this case.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).