Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011850220815

Ruling

Subject: Fringe benefits tax - car fringe benefits

Question

For the purpose of determining the employer's aggregate non-exempt amount under subsection 5B(1E) of the Fringe Benefits Assessment Act 1986, should direct travel between their home residence and clients' home, without first travelling to the work base, be considered to be business travel under the operating cost method of valuing car fringe benefits?

Answer: Yes

Relevant facts and circumstances

A Public Benevolent Institution (PBI) that cares for disadvantaged members of society by providing nursing and personal care services to clients in their homes as part of your aged care services.

You provide the use of motor vehicles to its staff that are personal carers, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, AIN and registered and enrolled endorsed nurses.

These employees perform the following duties but not limited to:

Daily routines:

You have several cars that are garaged at the private residences of your employees.

Employees travel between their home residence and employer's base and between their home residence and home of clients. They generally visit 4-6 clients per day.

Each car has a log book which is completed by the personal.

The logbooks show:

Personal use is kept to an absolute minimum. You ask staff not to use car for personal use unless it is emergency.

Relevant legislative provisions

subsection 5B(1E) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986.

Reasons for decision

Summary

For the purpose of determining the employer's aggregate non-exempt amount under subsection 5B(1E) of the FBTAA 1986, direct travel from an employee's home to a client's home, which is considered an alternative work place, and on to the work place, is considered to be business travel.

Detailed reasoning

You provide cars to your employees which are garaged at their place of residence. You also provide cars through salary packaging. The availability of these cars for private use is a benefit.

Benefits provided to an employee of a PBI are exempt from fringe benefits tax (FBT) under section 57A of the FBTAA up to the $30,000 capping threshold. If an employee is provided with fringe benefits above the capping threshold, then the PBI will be subject to FBT on those fringe benefits.

An employer that is a PBI must, therefore, determine its fringe benefits tax liability, if any, for each year of tax. To do this the employer needs to calculate its fringe benefits taxable amount, which is the amount on which the employer must pay FBT.

For a PBI, the employer's fringe benefits taxable amount is increased by the employer's aggregate non-exempt amount for the year of tax under subsection 5B(1D) of the FBTAA.

The employer's aggregate non-exempt amount is worked out in accordance with subsection 5B(1E) of the FBTAA. This is done by determining each employee's individual grossed-up non-exempt amount which is, effectively, the amount of any fringe benefits above the capping threshold.

In order to determine each employee's individual grossed-up non-exempt amount, the employer must work out the amount that would be each employee's individual fringe benefit amount. To do this, each benefit

must be treated as if it were a fringe benefit.

Under subsection 5E(2), an employee's individual fringe benefits amount is the sum of the employee's share of the taxable value of each fringe benefit that relates to the year of tax other than an excluded benefit.

In order to determine the individual fringe benefit amount for an employee who is provided with the use of an employer car, you need to calculate the taxable value as if that benefit were a fringe benefit.

You have maintained log books to determine the business use of cars.

Employees travel between their home residence and employer's base and between their home residence and home of clients. They generally visit 4-6 clients per day.

Miscellaneous Taxation Ruling MT 2027 explains the situations where home to work travel may constitute business travel.

One of these situations, as listed in paragraph 25 of MT 2027, is where the nature of the employee's employment is inherently itinerant.

Guidelines for determining whether an employee is carrying out itinerant work are provided by Taxation Ruling TR 95/34. Paragraph 7 sets out the following characteristics as being indicators of itinerancy:

In applying these characteristics to your employees:

As most of your employees call into the work base quite frequently to collect client meals or meet with senior staff or collect equipment needing to go to the client, they are considered to have a fixed place of work.

Having a fixed place of work, the journey between home and work base each day would be considered to be travel to work rather than on work, that is, private travel.

Furthermore, employees do not perform any employment or business duties at their homes. Employees' homes do not constitute a base of operations

Therefore, your employees would not satisfy the criteria that the nature of their employment is inherently itinerant.

Although your employees' nature of employment is not inherently itinerant, the journey may be considered business where the circumstances are akin to those described in paragraphs 28 to 36 of MT 2027.

Paragraphs 30-33 of MT 2027 state

Paragraph 34 further clarifies that

Therefore, in your circumstances, employees travel directly from home to a client's home, which is considered to be an alternative work place, would be considered business travel as employees perform substantial employment duties. Where return travel of this kind is undertaken from the employees' alternative work place would also be business travel.

Employees travel directly between home residence and their work base, their regular place of employment, would be private travel as in the decision in Lunney and Hayley v GCT (1958) 100 CLR.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).