Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of administratively binding advice

Authorisation Number: 1011855136672

This edited version of your advice will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the advice. The attached Tax Office advice fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Advice

Subject: Non-concessional contributions - structured settlement or order for personal injury

Questions

Advices

This advice applies for the following period:

30 June 2012

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2011

Relevant facts and circumstances

This advice is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are significantly different from these facts, this advice has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on Tax Office advice.

Your advice is based on the following facts.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 292-80.

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 292-85.

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 292-90.

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 292-90(2).

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 292-90(2)(c).

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 292-95.

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 292-95(1).

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 292-95(1)(b).

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 292-95(2).

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 292-95(3).

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 292-95(4).

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 292-95(5).

Reasons for decision

Summary

Provided all the necessary conditions are satisfied, the contribution that has arisen because of a consent judgment for personal injury to your client will not be a non-concessional contribution for the 2011-12 income year. Consequently, the contribution will not be counted towards your client's non-concessional contribution cap for the 2011-12 income year.

Detail reasoning

From 1 July 2007, non-concessional contributions made to superannuation funds are subject to an annual cap in accordance with subsection 292-85(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997). For the 2011-12 financial year, the non-concessional contributions cap is $150,000.

A person will be liable to pay excess non-concessional contributions tax at the rate of 46.5% on non-concessional contributions over the cap (sections 292-80 and 292-85 of the ITAA 1997).

Non-concessional contributions for a financial year are defined under section 292-90 of the ITAA 1997 and include:

Exclusions from the non-concessional contributions cap

Under subsection 292-90(2) of the ITAA 1997 a number of contribution types are excluded from being non-concessional contributions for a financial year. In particular, subparagraph 292-90(2)(c)(ii) excludes a contribution covered under section 292-95.

Section 292-95 of the ITAA 1997 deals with contributions arising from settlements or orders for personal injuries. The contribution in this case has arisen because of a consent judgment in respect of compensation personal injury to your client. We will need to determine if the contribution to be made to the superannuation fund falls under this section.

Conditions to be satisfied

Section 292-95 of the ITAA 1997 states:

Subsections (3) and (4) apply to the claim, but only to the extent that it relates to the compensation or damages referred to in paragraph (a), and only to amounts that, in the settlement agreement, or in the order, are identified as being solely in payment of that compensation or those damages.

As this contribution arises from a settlement in terms of subparagraph 292-95(1)(a)(i), subsection 292-95(3) outlines the conditions that must be satisfied:-

In addition, for a contribution to fall under this section the following conditions must also be satisfied:-

We will consider each of the conditions in turn.

Claim is for compensation or damages for a personal injury

In the facts provided your client's legal representative commenced action against the defendant in respect of your client's compensation claim for personal injury from his unlawful detention and deportation. Therefore, the contribution arose from a settlement of a claim for, or in respect of, personal injury.

Claim is based on the commission of a wrong or on a right created by statute

Your client claim was based on the commission of a wrong being his unlawful detention and deportation.

The settlement is in the form of a written agreement between the parties

The contribution arose from an agreement embodied in a consent judgment made by a Court.

Payment for personal injury arising from a structured settlement

Prior to the detention, your client's health was good. Your client health deteriorated immediately upon detention. As mentioned previously, your client's legal representative commenced action against the defendant in respect of your client's compensation claim for personal injury from his unlawful detention and deportation in a Court. As a result, the Court delivered a consent judgment in favour of your client. The compensation payment arose from the personal injuries your client suffered due to the unlawful detention and deportation.

As the contribution to be made to a superannuation fund (the Fund) comes from the payment which was a result of a consent judgment made by the court for personal injury, this condition will be satisfied.

The contribution being made within the 90 day period

To exclude a contribution made from the proceeds of a consent judgment by the Court, subsection 292-95(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997 requires the contribution to be made to a complying superannuation fund within 90 days of the later of:

The Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax Laws Amendment (Simplified Superannuation) Bill 2006, which inserted the provision, described this requirement as follows at paragraph 1.96:

In this case, the date of effect of the structured settlement embodied in the Consent Judgment was in November 2010. However, the amount was not received by your client until April 2011. Therefore, the 90 day period commences in April 2011.

Your client intends to contribute majority of the structured settlement payment to the Fund prior to the expiration of the 90 day period. Provided the contribution is made to the Fund no later than the 90 day period, this condition will be satisfied.

Certification from two legally qualified medical practitioners that because of the personal injury your client will never be able to be gainfully employed

This condition has been satisfied as you have provided certificates from two medical practitioners certifying that your client, as a result of the personal injury, is unlikely to ever be able to be gainfully employed in a capacity for which he is reasonably qualified because of education, experience or training.

Provision of a notice to the trustee of the Fund

You have advised that when the proposed contribution is made, your client's legal representative will provide a notice in the approved form to the trustee of the Fund at the time of making the contributions. If this is the case, this condition will also be satisfied.

Conclusion

Provided all the necessary conditions are satisfied, the contribution that has arisen because of a consent judgment for personal injury to your client will not be a non-concessional contribution for the 2011-12 income year. Consequently, the contribution will not be counted towards your client's non-concessional contribution cap for the 2011-12 income year.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).