Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011947009679

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.

Ruling

Subject: Fringe benefits tax: car benefits: car parking and reportable fringe benefits

Question 1

Will a car benefit arise under subsection 7(1) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA) when a pool car is either applied to a private use by an employee, or is taken to be available for the private use of an employee under either subsection 7(2) or subsection 7(3) of the FBTAA?

Answer:

Yes

Question 2

Where a car fringe benefit arises in relation to a pool car and an election is made to use the cost basis in section 10 of the FBTAA to calculate the taxable value of the car fringe benefit, will the fee paid by you to the Car pool operator be the 'operating cost of the car during the holding period'?

Answer:

No, the fee paid will not be the 'operating cost of the car during the holding period' as the fee includes the estimated fuel costs and a car parking charge.

Although the fee charged will not be the same as the 'operating cost of the car during the holding period' the inclusion of the additional costs in the fee calculation means the fee may be more than the value that would be calculated by allocating the costs set out in subsection 10(3). In such a situation, the use of the fee will not result in an underpayment of tax.

Question 3

If in a particular year, a pool car gives rise to a car benefit for more than one employee of the particular employer will the benefits be excluded fringe benefits under regulation 3F of the Fringe Benefits Tax Regulations 1992?

Answer:

Yes.

Question 4

If in the year in which a car is transferred to the car pool, the car gives rise to a car benefit to:

Answer:

Question 5

If a pool car gives rise to a car benefit for an employee will the benefit be an excluded fringe benefit under regulation 3F of the Fringe Benefits Tax Regulations 1992 if a car benefit has arisen in relation to the use of the car by an employee of an associated employer in the same year?

Answer:

No.

Question 6

Will a car parking fringe benefit arise under section 39A of the FBTAA if an employee who has garaged a pool car at his or her residence returns the car to the Car pool operator car park where it is parked for more than four hours if the car is available for use by all employees of the associated employers and is not driven home by an employee on that day?

Answer:

No

Question 7

Will a car parking fringe benefit arise under section 39A of the FBTAA if an employee who has garaged a pool car at his or her residence returns the car to the Car pool operator car park where it is parked for more than four hours if the car is available for use by all employees of the associated employers and is driven home by a different employee on that day?

Answer:

No

Question 8

Will a car parking fringe benefit arise under section 39A of the FBTAA if an employee who has garaged a pool car at his or her residence returns the car to the Car pool operator car park where it is parked for more than four hours before it is driven home by the same employee if the car is available for use by all employees of the associated employers?

Answer:

A car parking fringe benefit will not arise unless there is a sufficient or material connection between the provision of the car park and the employment of the employee.

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ending 31 March 2011

Year ending 31 March 2012

Year ending 31 March 2013

Relevant facts and circumstances

A new arrangement in relation to the management of the pool cars that are used by your employees has been implemented.

Previous arrangement

Under the previous arrangement an entity provided all fleet vehicles to the employers.

New arrangement

The administration of the car pool arrangements has been transferred to a unit of an employer.

The services that will be provided by unit include:

The vehicles transferred to the unit will be centrally managed and operated by the unit.

To use a vehicle in the car pool an employee will submit an electronic booking form 24 hours prior to the requested vehicle collection date and time.

Each booking must be approved by a relevant person. For example, the employee's manager must approve bookings of 14 days or less.

The employee's manager is responsible for advising the unit of the relevant cost code.

An employee who uses a pool vehicle is required to complete the relevant log book entries. This requirement is enforced by the unit's staff who check that the log book details have been completed when the vehicle is returned to the car pool.

As a general rule, pool vehicles can not be used for private purposes. However, on occasions the employment duties may necessitate the use of a vehicle for private purposes. For example, an on-call employee may be required to take a pool vehicle home on a rotational basis.

When the vehicle is returned unit staff enter the log book details into an electronic data base which is used to issue a tax invoice to the employer.

The charge for the use of a pool vehicle is based on the period between the start of the booking until the keys are returned. However, an additional per kilometre rate is charged if the vehicle travels more than a specified distance in a day.

The daily rate is comprised of a variable and fixed component.

Simultaneous to the transfer of the pool vehicles to unit, any associated car parking spaces are to be transferred to the unit. Once the car parking spaces are transferred the unit will pay for the cost of the lease over the car parking space. This cost is recovered as part of the fixed component of the amount charged to the employer.

Relevant legislative provisions

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 5D

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 5E

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 7(1)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 7(2)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 7(3)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 7(7)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 10

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 10(2)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 10(3)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 10A

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 10B

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 39A

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 45

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 58G

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 132(2)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Part XIC

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 135U(1)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 135U(3)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 135U(5)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 136(1)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 159

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 162

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 162(2)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 162G

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 162G(1)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 162H(1)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 162K

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 162K(2)

Fringe Benefits Tax Regulations 1992 Regulation 3F

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Will a car benefit arise under subsection 7(1) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA) when a pool car is either applied to a private use by an employee, or is taken to be available for the private use of an employee under either subsection 7(2) or subsection 7(3) of the FBTAA?

Summary

Under the proposed arrangement an employee will be provided with the use of a pool car. On occasions an employee who is provided with the use of a pool car will garage the car at his or her residence.

A car benefit will arise under subsection 7(1) of the FBTAA from the use of the car or the home garaging if the following conditions are satisfied:

In considering these conditions:

As each of the requirements are satisfied, a car benefit will arise under subsection 7(1) when a pool car is either applied to a private use by an employee, or is taken to be available for the private use of an employee under either subsection 7(2) or subsection 7(3) of the FBTAA.

Detailed reasoning

Under the proposed arrangement an employee will be provided with the use of a pool car. On occasions an employee who is provided with the use of a pool car will garage the car at his or her residence.

Under section 7 of the FBTAA the application of a car to a private use by an employee, or the availability of the car for the private use of the employee will be a car benefit when the conditions specified in subsection 7(1) are satisfied.

Subsection 7(1) states: 

Where:

(a) at any time on a day, in respect of the employment of an employee, a car held by a person (in this subsection referred to as the "provider"):

    (i) is applied to a private use by the employee or an associate of the employee; or

    (ii) is taken to be available for the private use of the employee or an associate of the employee; and

(b) either of the following conditions is satisfied -

    (i) the provider is the employer, or an associate of the employer, of the employee;

    (ii) the car is so applied or available, as the case may be, under an arrangement between -

      (A) the provider or another person; and

      (B) the employer, or an associate of the employer, of the employee,

that application or availability of the car shall be taken to constitute a benefit provided on that day by the provider to the employee or associate in respect of the employment of the employee.

In applying this subsection, a car benefit will arise from the use of the car or the home garaging if the following conditions are satisfied:

In considering whether these conditions are satisfied:

(i) Who holds the cars?

Subsection 7(1) requires the car to be held by a 'person'.

'Person' is defined in subsection 136(1) to include:

Under the arrangement the car pool will be managed by the unit which is part of the car pool operator. Neither the unit, nor the car pool operator comes within the categories listed in the definition of 'person'.

However, the car pool operator is an eligible State or Territory body which can be nominated as an employer for the purposes of the FBTAA. the car pool operator is a nominated body

As a consequence of the nomination, subsection 135U provides that the car pool operator will be treated as a company for the purposes of the FBTAA and will be a related company of:

Companies and related companies are deemed to be associates of each other under section 159 of the FBTAA.

Therefore, the Car pool operator and yourself can be the 'person' that holds the car. As the unit is a part of an employer, it is not an eligible State or Territory body and will not be the 'person' that holds the car.

In determining which body holds the car, subsection 162(1) of the FBTAA states:

The cars that are in the car pool will either be owned or leased. It is accepted that as a result of the nominations that have occurred, the car pool operator will be taken to be the owner or the lessee of the cars for the purposes of the FBTAA. Therefore, as the car pool operator is taken to either own or lease the cars it will be a 'person' that holds the cars.

As the car pool operator is a related company to you, the provider of the car for the purposes of subsection 7(1) will be:

In considering whether the car is also held by yourself, it is necessary to distinguish between a situation where the car is made available to the employee by the car pool operator under an arrangement with yourself (the employer), as compared to a situation where the car pool operator provides the car to you who provides the car to the employee.

In the first situation, the car will not be held by you as it is not owned, leased or otherwise made available to you. By contrast, the car in the second situation will be held by you.

Under the arrangement, an employee of yours will book a car. The arrangement is the result of a decision by Government for all pool cars to be held by the one employer which has the responsibility for managing the car fleet. The manner in which the arrangement has been established indicates it is the car pool operator that provides the car to the employee.

Although, the booking (depending upon the period booked) is required to be approved by the relevant person, this fact by itself is not sufficient to conclude that the arrangement involves the provision of a car to yourself, rather than an employee. In approving a booking the relevant person is merely giving approval for a car from the pool to be provided to an employee on the understanding that you will be charged for the booking.

Support for this conclusion is provided by the operation of subsection 7(7) of the FBTAA which states:

In applying this subsection, you will not hold the car in the instance where an employee who has the use of a pool car for a short period of time.

(ii) Is the car applied to a private use by an employee (or an associate), or is taken to be available for the private use of an employee (or an associate)?

Subsections 7(2) and 7(3) set out circumstances in which a car will be taken to be available for the private use of an employee or an associate of the employee.

Subsection 7(2) provides that a car that is held by the employer, or an associate of the employer will be taken to be available for the private use of an employee when it is garaged or kept at or near a place of residence of the employee or of an associate of the employee.

Subsection 7(3) provides that a car that is held by the employer, or an associate of the employer will be taken to be available for the private use of an employee when the car is not at business premises of the employer or an associate of the employer if:

On occasions a pool car will be applied to a private use by an employee (for example when an on-call employee drives the car to and from work), or will be taken to be available for the private use of an employee.

(iii) Will the provider be the employer or an associate of the employer?

As concluded above, the provider of the car for the purposes of subsection 7(1) will be:

Conclusion

As each of the requirements are satisfied, a car benefit will arise under subsection 7(1) when a pool car is either applied to a private use by an employee, or is taken to be available for the private use of an employee under either subsection 7(2) or subsection 7(3) of the FBTAA.

Question 2

Where a car fringe benefit arises in relation to a pool car and an election is made to use the cost basis in section 10 of the FBTAA to calculate the taxable value of the car fringe benefit, will the fee paid by you to the car pool operator be the 'operating cost of the car during the holding period'?

Summary

In using the cost basis in section 10 of the FBTAA to calculate the taxable value of the car fringe benefit that arises from a particular car the employer needs to determine:

Holding period

The first two dot points are determined by the holding period. In accordance with subsection 162(2) of the FBTAA, the holding period for the purposes determining the operating costs and the business use percentage will be the period for which the car was booked by the employee that received a car fringe benefit. It will not be the period for which the car was held by the Car pool operator.

The operating costs

The operating costs that are used to calculate the taxable value of the car during the holding period are set out in subsection 10(3) of the FBTAA.

For the pool cars, these costs will be:

There are practical difficulties in determining the costs that relate to the holding period as each car may be used by employees of multiple employers.

The FBTAA does not specify a method to be used to determine the operating costs that relate to a particular holding period where car benefits arise for multiple employers while the car is being held by the one provider.

To overcome the identified practical difficulties, you asked whether the fee paid by yourself can be used for the 'operating cost of the car during the holding period'.

The fee involves an allocation of the estimated annual costs of holding and using the year on the basis of the period for which the car was booked with an adjustment if the car travels more than a specified distance in the day.

The costs that are allocated are:

Only some of these costs will be the same as the operating cost components defined in subsection 10(3). For example, the lease costs are common to both calculations.

However, there are also some differences. For example the calculation of the fee includes:

In view of these differences, the fee paid by yourself will not be the same as the amount of the 'operating cost of the car during the holding period'.

However, the inclusion of these additional costs in the calculation of the fee means the fee is unlikely to be less than the value that would be calculated by allocating the costs set out in subsection 10(3).

The business use percentage

The business use percentage will be nil if the requirements of sections 10A and 10B are not met.

Section 10A sets out the requirements to be met in a log book year.

Section 10B sets out the requirements to be met in a year that is not a log book year.

The first year in which a car benefit arises as a result of an employee of yours booking a car will generally be a log book year of tax for that car. However, a year may be a non log book year even though it is the first year in which a car benefit arises for yourself from the use of a particular car, if the car is a replacement car.

Log book year of tax

In a log book year, the business use percentage will be nil unless:

Non log book year of tax

In a non log book year of tax the business use percentage for the period the car is booked by an employee will be nil unless:

Business use percentage

If the applicable log book and odometer records are kept, in calculating the business use percentage you will need to:

Detailed reasoning

In general terms, an employer can make an election to use the cost basis to calculate the taxable value of a car fringe benefit.

The formula for calculating the taxable value of a car fringe benefit using the cost basis is contained within subsection 10(2) of the FBTAA.

Subsection 10(2) of the FBTAA states:

In applying this formula to a particular car the employer needs to determine:

The holding period

Both the operating cost and the business use percentage are calculated by reference to the 'holding period'.

'Holding period' is defined in section 162C which states:

However, for the purposes of the application of section 10, this definition is subject to subsection 162(2) which states:

In explaining the application of subsection 162(2) the Explanatory Memorandum to Taxation Laws Amendment (Fringe Benefits and Substantiation) Bill 1987 stated:

Therefore, for the purpose of using the cost basis to calculate the taxable value of a car fringe benefit that arises from the use of a pool car, the holding period will be the part of the year that the car was used to provide a fringe benefit. This will be the period for which the car was booked by the employee.

The operating cost of the car during the holding period

Under subsection 10(3) of the FBTAA the operating cost of the car during the holding period is the sum of:

In accordance with the extract from the Explanatory Memorandum to Taxation Laws Amendment (Fringe Benefits and Substantiation) Bill 1987 quoted above, the calculation of the taxable value of a pool car using the cost basis will require a calculation of the operating costs that are applicable to the period in which the car was used to provide a fringe benefit.

However, as set out in your application, there are practical difficulties in determining the costs that relate to each particular holding period as during the year each pool car may be used by employees of multiple employers.

The FBTAA does not specify a method to use in a situation such as this where car benefits arise for multiple employers while the car is being held by the one provider.

There are a number of methods that could be used to determine the costs that relate to a particular holding period including:

However, there are practical difficulties with each of these methods as:

To overcome these practical difficulties, in your application you asked whether the fee paid by you can be used for the 'operating cost of the car during the holding period'.

The fee involves an allocation of the estimated annual costs of holding and using the year on the basis of the period for which the car was booked with an adjustment if the car travels more than a specified distance in the day.

The costs that are allocated are:

Only some of these costs will be the same as the operating cost components defined in subsection 10(3). For example, the lease costs are common to both calculations.

However, there are also some differences. In view of these differences, the fee paid by the department will not be 'the operating cost of the car during the holding period'.

However, the inclusion of these additional costs in the calculation of the fee means the fee is unlikely to be less than the value that would be calculated by allocating the costs set out in subsection 10(3). Consequently, the amount of tax paid using a calculation based on the fee paid by yourself is unlikely to be less than the amount of tax that would be paid using a calculation based on the costs set out in subsection 10(3).

The business use percentage applicable to the car during the holding period

Under subsection 10(2) of the FBTAA the business use percentage will be nil if the requirements of section 10A or 10B are not met. Section 10A applies to a year of tax that is a log book year of tax, whereas section 10B applies to a year of tax that is not a log book year.

When will a year be a log book year of tax?

Section 162G sets out when a year will be a log book year of tax. Subsection 162G(1) states:

For the purposes of the application of section 10 in relation to a car fringe benefit in relation to an employer in relation to a particular car while it was held by a particular person (in this subsection called the ``provider'') during a particular period (in this subsection called the ``holding period'') in a year of tax (in this subsection called the ``current year of tax''), the current year of tax is a log book year of tax of the employer in relation to the car if, and only if:

Note:

This paragraph will apply if it is the first year that the employer uses the cost basis method.

(c)-(g) (Omitted by No 145 of 1995)

(h) the Commissioner causes a notice in writing to be served on the employer before the commencement of the current year of tax requiring the employer to treat the current year of tax as a log book year of tax of the employer in relation to the car.

In applying this definition, a year of tax will be a log book year of tax for you in relation to a particular car if:

Record keeping requirements in a log book year of tax

As set out above, section 10A applies to a year of tax that is a log book year of tax Section 10A states:

In applying subsection 162(2), section 10A provides that if the year of tax is a log book year of tax in relation to a particular car for you, the business use percentage for the period the car is booked by an employee will be nil unless:

Log book records

The definition of 'log book records' in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA requires certain details to be kept for each 'business journey' under taken during the relevant 'log book period'.

'Business journey' is defined in subsection 136(1) to mean:

'Log book records' is defined in subsection 136(1) to mean:

An applicable log book period is defined in subsection 162H(1) of the FBTAA which states:

In accordance with this definition, the log book period of a pool car will generally be the period for which the car is booked by an employee.

Therefore, in a log book year, section 10A requires:

These records will be used by the employer to estimate the number of business kilometres travelled during the holding period and the business use percentage. This process is discussed below.

Record keeping requirements in a year that is not a log book year of tax

As set out above, section 10B applies to a year which is not a log book year. Generally, this will be a year in which a car benefit arises from the use of a car for which a car benefit has arisen for you in a previous year.

However, a year may be a non log book year even though it is the first year in which a car benefit arises for you from the use of a particular car, if the car is a replacement car.

As set out in the Explanatory Memorandum to Taxation laws Amendment (Fringe Benefits and Substantiation) Bill 1987section 162K:

Subsection 162K(2) states:

However, the transfer of a business percentage is conditional on a record being made of the make, model and registration number of both cars and the date on which the replacement was made.

Section 10B states:

In applying subsection 162(2), section 10B provides that if the year of tax is not a log book year of tax in relation to a particular car for you, the business use percentage for the period the car is booked by an employee will be nil unless:

The business use percentage

'Business use percentage' is defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA to mean the percentage calculated on the basis of the formula:

Therefore, for each period in which a car benefit arises during the period in which the car is booked by an employee, you will need to:

Question 3

If a pool car gives rise to a car benefit for more than one employee, will the benefits be excluded fringe benefits under regulation 3F of the Fringe Benefits Tax Regulations 1992?

Summary

In general terms, if the total of the taxable values of the fringe benefits provided to an employee during an FBT year is more than $2,000 the employer is required to record the grossed-up taxable value of the fringe benefits on the employee's payment summary.

However, some fringe benefits do not need to be reported. These benefits are called excluded benefits.

Regulation 3F of the Fringe benefits Tax Regulations 1992 provides that a car benefit may be an excluded benefit where the following conditions are met:

As each of these conditions will be met in an FBT year in which the particular pool car gives rise to a car benefit for more than one employee, each of the car benefits provided during that year to your employees will be an excluded fringe benefit under regulation 3F.

Detailed reasoning

In general terms, if the total of the taxable values of the fringe benefits provided to an employee during an FBT year is more than $2,000 the employer is required to record the grossed-up taxable value of the fringe benefits on the employee's payment summary.

However, some fringe benefits do not need to be reported. These benefits are called excluded benefits.

Regulation 3F of the Fringe benefits Tax regulations 1992 provides that a car benefit may be an excluded benefit where it relates to a car that gives rise to a car benefit for more than one employee during the year.

Regulation 3F states:

… a benefit is an excluded fringe benefit if, during a year of tax:

In accordance with this regulation, a benefit will be an excluded benefit where the following conditions are met:

In considering these conditions:

(i) Is the benefit a car benefit?

As concluded in relation to question 1 the benefit will be a car benefit.

(ii) Is the car benefit a fringe benefit, or an exempt benefit that would have been a fringe benefit if it was not an exempt benefit?

The car benefit will either be a fringe benefit, or an exempt benefit that would have been a fringe benefit if it was not an exempt benefit.

(iii) Did the car benefit relate to a car that gave rise to a car benefit for more than one employee during the relevant FBT year?

This condition will also be met as the car has given rise to a car benefit for more than one employee during the relevant FBT year.

Question 4

If in the year in which a car is transferred to the car pool, the car gives rise to a car benefit to an employee during the period in which it was held by the employer and to a second employee during the period in which it is part of the car pool:

Summary

Reporting requirements

The previous question concerned the reporting requirements for a car benefit if the particular car from which the car benefit arose gave rise to a car benefit for another employee during the particular year, if the car was held by the same 'provider' when both of the car benefits were provided.

As set out in the response to that question, both of the car benefits are an excluded benefit.

This answer will not change if the pool car was held by the employer at the time the first car benefit was provided and by the car pool operator at the time the second car benefit was provided as:

Log book requirements

The response to question two discussed the log book requirements that apply when a car benefit arises from the use of a pool car by an employee.

In the year in which a car that was held by the employer is transferred to the car pool there will be two holding periods.

The first holding period will be the period in which it was held by the employer. Generally, this will be the period from 1 April until the date on which the car was transferred to the car pool operator.

The second holding period is the period in which it is used to provide a car benefit to an employee of the employer while it was held by the car pool operator.

Period in which the car was held by the employer

Generally, a car which is transferred from the employer to the car pool operator will have been held by the employer at the commencement of the year of tax. Consequently, as the cars are generally held for less than four years and a log book is kept in the first year in which a car is held, the transition year will generally not be a log book year of tax in respect of the period for which the car was held by the employer.

In such a situation, section 10B is the relevant section to consider. Under section 10B the employer is required to:

Period in which the car was held by the car pool operator

As discussed above, in relation to question 2 the relevant holding period for the car benefit provided to an employee while the car is being held by the car pool operator will be the part of the year that a car fringe benefit arose from the car as a result of an employee booking the car.

In applying the definition of log book year of tax in subsection 162G(1), the first year in which a car fringe benefit is provided to an employee after the car has been transferred will be a log book year of tax.

Therefore, in applying section 10A to the car benefit that arose in relation to the use of the car by an employee after it was transferred to the Car pool operator, the employer is required to:

Detailed reasoning

Reporting requirements

The previous question concerned the reporting requirements for a car benefit if the particular car from which the car benefit arose gave rise to a car benefit for another employee during the particular year, if the car was held by the same 'provider' when both of the car benefits were provided.

As set out in the response to that question, both of the car benefits are an excluded benefit.

This answer will not change if the pool car was held by the employer at the time the first car benefit was provided and by the Car pool operator at the time the second car benefit was provided as:

Log book requirements

The response to question two discussed the log book requirements that apply when a car benefit arises from the use of a pool car by an employee.

In the year in which a car that was held by the employer is transferred to the car pool there will be two holding periods.

The first holding period will be the period in which it was held by the employer. This will be the period from 1 April until the date on which the car was transferred back to the car pool operator.

The second holding period is the period in which it was held by the car pool operator and is used to provide a car benefit to an employee of the employer.

In considering the records that need to be kept in relation to both of these periods:

Each of these sections refers to car fringe benefits that relate to a car 'while it was held by a particular person'. That is, in identifying the records that are required to be kept for both of the holding periods it is necessary to separately consider both periods.

Period in which the car was held by the employer

Generally, a car which is transferred from the employer to the car pool operator will have been held by the employer at the commencement of the year of tax. Consequently, as the cars are generally held for less than four years and a log book is kept in the first year in which a car is held, the transition year will generally not be a log book year of tax in respect of the period for which the car was held by the employer.

In such a situation, section 10B is the relevant section to consider. Under section 10B the employer is required to:

Period in which the car was held by the car pool operator

As discussed above, in relation to question 2 the relevant holding period for the car benefit provided to an employee while the car is being held by the car pool operator will be the part of the year that a car fringe benefit arose from the car as a result of an employee booking the car.

In applying the definition of log book year of tax in subsection 162G(1), the first year in which a car fringe benefit is provided to an employee after the car has been transferred will be a log book year of tax.

Therefore, in applying section 10A to the car benefit that arose in relation to the use of the car by an employee after it was transferred to the car pool operator, the employer is required to:

Question 5

If a pool car gives rise to a car benefit for an employee will the benefit be an excluded fringe benefit under regulation 3F of the Fringe Benefits Tax Regulations 1992 if a car benefit has arisen in relation to the use of the car by an employee of a associated employer in the same year?

Summary

As discussed above in answer to question three, a car benefit will be an excluded benefit that will not be reported on the employee's payment summary where:

Where a car benefit only arises in relation to one employee yours the second requirement will not be satisfied. Therefore, the exclusion under regulation 3F will not apply to a car benefit provided to an employee by virtue that the car has been used to provide a car benefit to an employee of an associate.

Detailed reasoning

As discussed above in answer to question three, a car benefit will be an excluded benefit that will not be reported on the employee's payment summary where:

Where a car benefit only arises in relation to one employee of yours the second requirement will not be satisfied. Therefore, the exclusion under regulation 3F will not apply to a car benefit provided to an employee by virtue that the car has been used to provide a car benefit to an employee of an associate.

In your ruling application you referred to the fact that all government bodies are part of the Crown and for common law purposes constitute one legal entity. We do not dispute this fact. However, as discussed above in relation to question one, when an eligible State or Territory body is nominated, under subsection 135U(1), the nominated body is taken for the purposes of the Act to be the employer of each employee of the State or Territory that has a sufficient connection with the body. Therefore, once a nomination has been made, the relevant employer for the purposes of the FBTAA is the nominated body. It is not the Crown.

In your application you also contended that regulation 3F does not specifically state that the recipient employees must be employed by the same employer. We do not agree with this contention as regulation 3F does not sit alone.

As set out in paragraph (a) of subregulation 3F(1) the benefit being considered is 'a car benefit, as described in subsection 7(1) of the Act'. For the benefit to be a car benefit, paragraph 7(1)(b) requires either:

That is, subsection 7(1) identifies a particular employer to which the car benefit relates. Given this linkage to the employer of the employee in subsection 7(1), we do not agree with your contention that regulation 3F can apply where there are different employers.

It is also necessary to consider the context in which the reportable fringe benefit provisions operate. To determine whether an employee has a reportable fringe benefits amount that has to be shown on the employee's payment summary the employer is required to calculate the individual fringe benefits amount of the employee.

As set out in section 5D of the FBTAA, 'an employee's individual fringe benefits amount is the employee's share of the taxable value of fringe benefits (with some exclusions) provided in respect of his or her employment.' That is, the reportable fringe benefits tax system involves the allocation of the employer's fringe benefits between the employer's employees. Any fringe benefits provided by other employers to their employees are not part of this process.

It should be noted that there are practical reasons for not taking the fringe benefits provided to employees of other employers into account as an individual employer has no way of knowing whether a car benefit has arisen in relation to the availability or use of a particular car by an employee of another employer. Although in the situation being considered car benefits will only arise in relation to the use of the car by an employee of an associate of the employer, subsection 132(2) of the FBTAA only requires an associate that provides a fringe benefit to an employee of the employer to keep records that are relevant for the purpose of ascertaining the employer's liability under the FBTAA and to provide those records to the employer. There is no requirement to provide these details to be provided to other employers.

Question 6

Will a car parking fringe benefit arise under section 39A of the FBTAA if an employee who has garaged a pool car at his or her residence returns the car to the car pool operator car park where it is parked for more than four hours if the car is available for use by all employees of the associated employers and is not driven home by an employee on that day?

Summary

A fringe benefit will not arise unless a benefit has been provided to an employee or an associate of an employee.

An employee who returns a pool car that has been garaged at the employee's residence to the car pool operator car park will receive a car benefit from the garaging of the car at his or her residence and driving the car from home to work.

The employee ceases to receive a benefit once the car is parked. From that point, it is the car pool operator that receives the benefit of having its car parked in the car park.

Detailed reasoning

'Car parking fringe benefit' is defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA to mean 'a fringe benefit that is a car parking benefit'.

The definition of 'fringe benefit' in subsection 136(1) states:

This definition was considered by the Full Federal Court in FC of T v Indooroopilly Children Services (Qld) Pty Ltd [2007] FCAFC 16; 2007 ATC 4236; 65 ATR 369.

In discussing whether this definition required the identification of a particular employee, Edmonds J at ATC 4253 said:

In applying this decision it is necessary to be able to identify a particular employee to which the benefit relates and the benefit has to be provided in respect of the employment of that employee.

In the given situation, the employee is merely returning a pool car which he or she has been using to the car pool operator car park. The only benefit that can be identified as being provided to the employee is the use of the car to drive to work. This is a separate car benefit.

The employee ceases to receive a benefit once the car is parked. From that point, it is the car pool operator that receives the benefit of having its car parked in the car park. As such, this situation can be distinguished from a situation in which the employee drives a car to and from work and receives the benefit of having a car parking space in which to park the car. In such a situation, the employee can be seen to be receiving a benefit from the use of the car park.

Question 7

Will a car parking fringe benefit arise under section 39A of the FBTAA if an employee who has garaged a pool car at his or her residence returns the car to the Car pool operator car park where it is parked for more than four hours if the car is available for use by all employees of the associated employers and is driven home by a different employee on that day?

Summary

The facts of this situation are similar to the previous question as an employee who has no ongoing entitlement to use a pool car returns the car to the car park in the morning.

In accordance with the response given to question six, this employee will not receive a benefit once the car is returned to the car park. Prior to that time, the benefit will be a car benefit.

The fact that another employee drives the car home at night will not alter the answer for the employee who returns the car to the car park in the morning.

The same principle applies to the employee who drives the car home that night. Provided the employee does not have an ongoing entitlement to use the car to travel between home and work, the employee cannot be said to have received a benefit prior to the time at which he or she drove the car home. As with the first employee, the only benefit that arises from taking the car home will be a car benefit.

Detailed reasoning

The facts of this situation are similar to the previous question as an employee who has no ongoing entitlement to use a pool car returns the car to the car park in the morning. In accordance with the response given to question six, this employee will not receive a benefit once the car is returned to the car park. Prior to that time, the benefit will be a car benefit.

The fact that another employee drives the car home at night will not alter the answer for the employee who returns the car to the car park in the morning.

The same principle applies to the employee who drives the car home that night. Provided the employee does not have an ongoing entitlement to use the car to travel between home and work, the employee cannot be said to have received a benefit prior to the time at which he or she drove the car home. As with the first employee, the only benefit that arises from taking the car home will be a car benefit.

Question 8

Will a car parking fringe benefit arise under section 39A of the FBTAA if an employee who has garaged a pool car at his or her residence returns the car to the car pool operator car park where it is parked for more than four hours before it is driven home by the same employee if the car is available for use by all employees of the associated employers?

Summary

In this third situation, the employee who returns the car to the car pool operator car park in the morning drives the car home at night.

In such a situation, the employee may receive both car benefits and a car parking benefit if the requirements of subsection 39A(1) are met.

One of the requirements is for the benefit to be 'in respect of the employment of the employee'. This requirement is also contained within the definition of 'fringe benefit'.

The phrase "in respect of" in relation to the employment of an employee is defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA to include 'by reason of, by virtue of, for or in relation directly or indirectly to, that employment'.

The meaning of this was phrase was considered by the Federal court in J & G Knowles v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2000] 96 FCR 402; 2000 ATC 4151; 44 ATR 22 (Knowles) and Starrim Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2000] FCA 952; 2000 ATC 4460; 44 ATR 487 (Starrim).

In applying this decision, for the car park to be considered to be provided 'in respect of' the employment of the employee there needs to be a sufficient or material connection between the provision of the car park and the employment of the employee. Unless the car park can be seen to be a product or incident of the employment it is unlikely to be a fringe benefit.

By itself, the fact that a car is driven both from home to work and then from work to home on the same day by an employee who does not have an ongoing entitlement to the private use of the car will not provide the necessary connection between the benefit and the employment of the employee.

However, the necessary connection may exist if the employee has an ongoing entitlement to take the car home.

Detailed reasoning

In this third situation, the employee who returns the car to the car pool operator car park in the morning drives the car home at night.

In such a situation, the employee may receive both car benefits and a car parking benefit if the requirements of subsection 39A(1) are met.

Under subsection 39A(1) a car parking benefit will arise on a day when a car benefit relating to the car is provided to an employee or an associate in respect of the employment of the employee if:

One of the requirements is for the benefit to be 'in respect of the employment of the employee'. This requirement is also contained within the definition of 'fringe benefit'.

The phrase "in respect of" in relation to the employment of an employee is defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA to include 'by reason of, by virtue of, for or in relation directly or indirectly to, that employment'.

The meaning of this was phrase was considered by the Federal court in J & G Knowles v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2000] 96 FCR 402; 2000 ATC 4151; 44 ATR 22 (Knowles) and Starrim Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2000] FCA 952; 2000 ATC 4460; 44 ATR 487 (Starrim).

In Knowles the Full Federal Court considered the judgements in Smith v FCT (1987) 164 CLR 513; 19 ATR 274; 87 ATC 4883 and Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Rowe (1995) 60 FCR 99; 31 ATR 392; 95 ATC 4691 before concluding that it is not sufficient for the purposes of the FBTAA to conclude that there is a causal connection between the benefit and the employment.

At paragraph 26 the Court said:

At paragraphs 28 and 29 the Court said:

In applying this decision, for the car park to be considered to be provided 'in respect of' the employment of the employee there needs to be a sufficient or material connection between the provision of the car park and the employment of the employee. Unless the car park can be seen to be a product or incident of the employment it is unlikely to be a fringe benefit.

By itself, the fact that a car is driven both from home to work and then from work to home on the same day by an employee who does not have an ongoing entitlement to the private use of the car will not provide the necessary connection between the benefit and the employment of the employee.

However, the necessary connection may exist if the employee has an ongoing entitlement to take the car home.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).