Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011957148287

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.

Ruling

Subject: acquisition of trading stock and the application of sections 70-90 and 70-95 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997

Question 1

Is Entity A treated as having bought items of trading stock for the market value of the items, being the amount required to be included in the assessable income of Entity B and Entity C, pursuant to sections 70-90 and 70-95 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following periods:

1 July 2010 to 30 June 2011

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2010

Relevant facts and circumstances

Entity A signed an Asset Sale Agreement with Entity B, parent company of Entity C, to acquire businesses in Australia.

The Asset Sale Agreement concerns the sale of the businesses (comprising of business assets) and contains typical clauses requiring the seller to continue operating the businesses until settlement and restricting the seller from soliciting customers, soliciting transferring employees and competing in business after settlement.

The assets referable to the Australian business acquired by Entity A can be categorised into three broad categories:

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 70-90

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 70-95

Reasons for decision

Section 70-90 of the ITAA 1997 states:

Section 70-95 of the ITAA 1997 states:

Sections 70-90 and 70-95 of the ITAA 1997 were introduced in the Tax Law Improvement Act 1997. Similar provisions previously existed in the now repealed section 36 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936). Subsection 36(1) of the ITAA 1936 stated:

Subject to this section, where:

Disposal of trading stock

Section 70-90 of the ITAA 1997 requires that an entity dispose of an item of trading stock.

Dispose

The word 'dispose' is not defined in the ITAA 1997. The word 'dispose' in the context of the now repealed subsection 36(1) of the ITAA 1936 was considered by the High Court of Australia in Rose v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1951) 84 CLR 118 (Rose). Dixon, Fullager and Kitto JJ observed at page 123 that:

The Asset Sale Agreement required Entity B and Entity C to dispose of items to Entity A.

Trading stock

Section 70-10 of the ITAA 1997 states that:

"Trading stock" includes:

The items disposed of by Entity B and Entity C and acquired by Entity A included finished goods, work in progress and raw materials. The finished goods consisted of finished products or items held for the purpose of sale to the various customers of Entity B and Entity C. The work in progress and raw materials consisted of items held for the purpose of manufacturing further finished goods that would also be sold to customers of Entity B and Entity C.

The finished goods, work in progress and raw materials disposed of by Entity B and Entity C to Entity A satisfy the definition of trading stock in section 70-10 of the ITAA 1997. Accordingly, Entity B and Entity C are taken to have disposed of items of trading stock to Entity A for the purposes of section 70-90 of the ITAA 1997.

Disposal of trading stock outside ordinary course of business

Section 70-90 of the ITAA 1997 requires that the disposal of items of trading stock be outside the ordinary course of business.

Disposal of trading stock outside the ordinary course of business was considered in relation to the now repealed section 36(1) of the ITAA 1936 by the High Court of Australia in Farnsworth v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR 504 (Farnsworth).

In Farnsworth a question to be determined was whether or not a fruit grower, that delivered fruit to a packing company where it became inextricably mixed with the fruit of other growers, disposed of trading stock for the purposes of section 36(1) of the ITAA 1936.

Latham CJ observed at page 514 that:

Dixon J observed at page 519 that section 36(1) of the ITAA 1936:

This provision is generally considered to have no application to the regular disposal of trading stock in the ordinary course of carrying on a business.

In Farnsworth it was determined that the trading stock had not been disposed of outside the ordinary course of business.

The term 'in the ordinary course of business' was previously used in the now repealed paragraph 95(2)(b) of the Commonwealth Bankruptcy Act 1924. The term was considered in Downs Distributing Co Pty Ltd v Associated Blue Star Stores Pty Ltd (Downs Distributing).

In Downs Distributing a question to be determined was whether a transfer of property in a bankruptcy had taken place in the ordinary course of business. Rich J at page 477 observed that the term 'in the ordinary course of business' as used in paragraph 95(2)(b) of the Commonwealth Bankruptcy Act 1924

Entity B and Entity C had obligations under the Asset Sale Agreement to continue carrying on the businesses as a going concern until final settlement of the Asset Sale Agreement.

The Asset Sale Agreement required disposal of the trading stock as part of an overall agreement for the sale of the businesses operated by Entity B and Entity C to Entity A. Entity B and Entity C ceased operating the businesses and were prohibited from establishing or carrying on any similar businesses for a period of time after final settlement of the Asset Sale Agreement.

It is considered therefore, that the items of trading stock disposed of by Entity B and Entity C and acquired by Entity A involved a disposal which was outside the ordinary course of business.

Conclusion

Entity B and Entity C disposed of the trading stock outside the ordinary course of business. The items of trading stock disposed of by Entity B and Entity C were acquired by Entity A.

Section 70-90 of the ITAA 1997 applies to the disposal so that the market value of the items of trading stock would be included in the assessable income of Entity B and Entity C.

Section 70-95 of the ITAA 1997 applies to the acquisition of the items of trading stock by Entity A. Entity A is treated as having bought the items of trading stock for the amount included in the assessable income of Entity B and Entity C.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).