Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011964483488

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.

Ruling

Subject: GST and sale of farmland

Question 1

Will the supply of property be GST-free?

Answer

The supply of the property will be GST-free when supplied to an entity who intends that a farming business will be carried on, on the land.

Relevant facts and circumstances

· You consider that all blocks (with the exception of Lot D) will be purchased by people who intend to carry on farming activities on the land

· You consider that Lot D will be purchased by someone seeking a "lifestyle" block as it is considered that the lot is too small to sustain a viable farming business

· Since ceasing the primary production operations, the livestock has been sold, employees have been reassigned and machinery and equipment disposed of.

Assumption

The above ruling relies on the assumption that the recipient of the supply of land intends that a farming business be carried on, on the land.

Relevant legislative provisions

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 section 38-480.

Reasons for decision

Subdivision 38-O of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act) allows the supply of farmland to be GST-free in certain circumstances. Section 38-480 of the GST Act states:

The term 'farming business' is defined in subsection 38-475(2) to include maintaining animals for the purpose of selling them or their bodily produce (including natural increase).

In your case you were undertaking non-primary production activities together with primary production activities. The primary production activities meet the definition of a farming business in subsection 38-475(2) of the GST Act.

The ATO Primary Production Industry Partnership issues register question 6.2.1(a) sets out that there will be situations where not all of the land is used for farming purposes. Whether or not this precludes the operation of section 38-480 of the GST Act will depend on the facts in each case. The critical issue to be determined is: 'of all the activities on the land (including private use), is farming the predominant activity?' In other words, does the land have the essential characteristics of farmland or are the other activities so significant that the land cannot be considered to be farmland.

Some of the indicators that the ATO considers relevant in determining whether the land has the essential characteristics of farmland are:

After reviewing these factors and taking into account the area and value of the land devoted to the farming activity we consider that although there were non-primary production activities undertaken, the dominant usage of the property is for the farming activity. Therefore all the lots have the essential characteristics of farmland.

In addition because the actual farming activity has ceased, we need to look at whether the land is land on which a farming business has been carried on for at least the period of 5 years preceding the supply.

The definite article 'the' in the expression 'the period of five years' indicates that the period in which a farming business must be carried on, on the land, is a continuous period of five years immediately before the supply of the land. This is distinct from the expression 'a period of five years preceding the supply' which may refer to any period of five years before the supply of the land.

The term 'carrying on' is also defined in the GST Act in section 195-1 and includes anything done in the course of the commencement or termination of the enterprise. Accordingly, carrying on a farming business includes all the routine farming activities carried out on the land together with any other activities related to commencing, conducting and terminating the farming business.

You advised that following a review of your activities, primary production activities ceased approximately 6 months ago. Since that time you advised that in preparation for the sale of the property that personnel have either been reassigned or taken a redundancy, the livestock has been sold and machinery and equipment moved.

We consider that these activities were in the course of terminating the farming business and accordingly, the farming business was still carried on. Provided the property is not used for a purpose that is not related to a farming business prior to the sale, we consider that the land is land on which a farming business has been carried on for at least the period of 5 years preceding the supply.

As such, where the property is not used for a purpose that is not related to a farming business prior to the sale and assuming the recipient of the supply of land intends that a farming business be carried on, on the land, the supply of the freehold interest in the land will be GST-free

Further issues for you to consider

As discussed above, this ruling relies on the assumption that the recipient of the supply of land intends that a farming business be carried on, on the land.

In the case a recipient does not intend that a farming business be carried out on the land, the supply will not be GST-free.

As a supplier, you should seek evidence to demonstrate that a reasonable enquiry has been made about the purchaser's intention. What is reasonable will depend on all the circumstances. Usually this will require that you ask the purchaser whether or not there is an intention to carry on a farming business. The important factor to consider, in determining whether a supply of farm land is GST-free under section 38-480 of the GST Act, is the use of the land as opposed to the ownership of it. Therefore, the recipient of the supply need only intend that a farming business be carried on, on the land. Paragraph 38-480(b) does not require purchasers to carry on the farming business themselves.

In most cases if the vendor obtains a written statement or warranty from the purchaser stating the intention is that a farming business be carried on, then the vendor will be able to demonstrate that it has made a reasonable enquiry about the purchaser's intention, unless the vendor has reason to believe the information is incorrect.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).