Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012031200858

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.

Ruling

Subject: Deductibility of Access Payments

Question 1

To Confirm that Access Payments that will be incurred in respect of operating the Facility are deductible pursuant to section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997).

Answer

Yes, the Access Payments that will be incurred in respect of operating the Facility will be deductible under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.

This ruling applies for the following periods:

The scheme commences on:

Relevant facts and circumstances

The Finance Entity and the Construction Entity are part of a group of entities which has been engaged by Party A to construct and operate a Facility over a number of years and to finance the cost of construction to Party A including Progress Payments.

Construction Entity will obtain a Right of Access which will provide it with access to the Site and the ability to carry out its service commitments to Party A during the Operation Phase. Pursuant to certain contractual terms, Construction Entity will make periodic Access Payments and will receive periodic service payments for providing services during the Operation Phase.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 995-1

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 8-1

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Division 230

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 sub section 230-20(4)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 230-45(1)(e)(ii)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 230-45(1)(f)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 230-460(2)(e)

Reasons for decision

The Taxation of Financial Arrangements (TOFA) rules contained in Division 230 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) set out the income tax treatment of gains and losses on financial arrangements. Subsection 230-20(4) provides that if the TOFA rules apply then section 8-1 will not apply. Prior to considering whether section 8-1 applies it is necessary to consider if the TOFA rules apply to the payments and receipts under the Right of Access.

The ATO accepts that Access Payments that will be made by Construction Entity will not be subject to the TOFA rules.

Section 8-1

Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 states:

Business expenditure is deductible as a general (revenue nature) deduction if it has the necessary and relevant connection with the operation or activities which directly gain or produce assessable income (Charles Moore & Co (WA) Pty Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1956) 95 CLR 344; 11 ATD 147; 6 AITR 379, Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Smith (1981) 147 CLR 578; (1981) 11 ATR 538; (1981) 81 ATC 4114, Ronpibon Tin NL & Tong Kah Compound NL v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR 47; (1949) 4 AITR 236; (1949) 8 ATD 431).

Provided that a loss or outgoing can be objectively viewed as a necessary or natural consequence of the taxpayer's income earning activities, it will be 'incidental and relevant' to the income earning activities of the taxpayer and deductible as a revenue deduction under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997, except to the extent that it is a loss or outgoing of capital or of a capital nature (see discussion of the High Court in Steele v. Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 197 CLR 459; 99 ATC 4242; (1999) 41 ATR 139)).

The established principles on the distinction between capital and income are well known; see for example, Dixon J's judgement in Sun Newspapers Ltd & Associated Newspapers Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1938) 61 CLR 337; (1938) 5 ATD 87 (Sun Newspapers Case), and the Full Federal Court decision in FC of T v. Email (1999) 99 ATC 4868 at 4873; 42 ATR 698 at 704). The character of the advantage sought provides guidance as to the nature of the expenditure as it says most about the essential character of the expenditure itself. The decision of the High Court in G.P. International Pipecoaters v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (90 ATC 4413; (1990) 170 CLR 124; 21 ATR 1) emphasised this, stating:

Negative limb

The next test is to determine whether any of the negative limbs of section 8-1 ITAA 1997 apply. In this case the relevant negative limb is contained in paragraph 8-1(2)(a) for:

'… a loss or outgoing of capital, or of a capital nature.'

In Hallstroms Pty Ltd v FC of T (1946) 8 ATD 190 at p 196; (1946) 72 CLR 634 at p 648., Dixon J said that the answer to the income/capital question:

The test for when expenditure is capital or capital in nature and therefore whether the expenditure goes to the profit-yielding structure (or otherwise is revenue in nature and is concerned with the process by income is derived) is classically outlined in Sun Newspapers (1938) 61 CLR 337;at 363 per Dixon J:

Consideration of the Sun Newspapers' factors

The Access Payments will be paid periodically.

The Access Payments are calculated to effect the limitations placed on the use of the Site by Construction Entity pursuant to certain contractual terms including the terms of the Right of Access to those services by which Construction Entity may perform to earn its assessable income.

Should Construction Entity fail to make an Access Payment, Party A may terminate the contractual arrangements which may render Construction Entity unable to earn the periodic service payments.

Conclusion

The periodic service payments will form part of Construction Entity's assessable income and the Access Payments for access to the Site will be an incidental consequence of the service activities by which Construction Entity will derive its assessable income. The Access Payments fulfil the positive test for a deduction under subsection 8-1(1) of the ITAA 1997 being 'outgoings incurred in gaining or producing assessable income'.

The Access Payments will not be capital nor capital in nature as the Payments are a cost that will be incurred by Construction Entity in the process of obtaining its assessable income rather than a cost in establishing or enlarging Construction Entity's income earning structure.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).