Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012101716223

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.

Ruling

Subject: GST and sale of property

Questions

Answers

Relevant facts and circumstances

You, an entity, are a wholly owned subsidiary of a company which is currently in liquidation.

You were incorporated for the purpose of acquiring a property to subdivide for sale. Your Directors' report indicated that all parcels of land were sold more than 20 years ago. .

Years later, you were deregistered by Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) on your directors' application as part of the cleanup of your company group.

A few years later, ASIC wrote to your former directors to inform them of a remnant lot that remained on your original title.

Your directors applied for your reinstatement with ASIC in order to deal with the land. Your directors also notified the liquidator of your holding company. Consequently, you were reinstated on the company register by ASIC.

All the necessary work to obtain a new title for the land was carried out shortly thereafter by your directors.

The remnant lot was sold and will settle soon.

Once the contract is settled, no further activities will be carried on by you

You will then be deregistered or wound up.

Relevant legislative provisions

A New Tax System (Goods and Services) Act 1999 Section 9-20.

A New Tax System (Goods and Services) Act 1999 Section 23-5.

A New Tax System (Goods and Services) Act 1999 Section 23-15.

A New Tax System (Goods and Services) Act 1999 Section 188-10.

A New Tax System (Goods and Services) Act 1999 Section 188-15.

A New Tax System (Goods and Services) Act 1999 Section 188-20.

A New Tax System (Goods and Services) Act 1999 Section 188-25.

A New Tax System (Goods and Services) Act 1999 Section 188-20.

A New Tax System (Goods and Services) Act 1999 Division 195.

Reasons for decision

1. Are you carrying on an enterprise?

Section 9-20 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act) provides, among other things, that an enterprise is an activity or series of activities done:

The term carrying on an enterprise is defined in section 195-1 of the GST Act. It ensures that activities done in the course of commencement or termination of an enterprise are included in determining whether activities of the entity amount to an enterprise.

In this case, you were incorporated for the purposes of acquiring a property to subdivide for sale. Your Directors' reports indicated that all parcels were sold many years ago.

Some years later, you were deregistered by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) on your directors' application as part of the cleanup of your company group.

You contend that the business of buying, subdividing and selling of land had ceased during this period. You considered that you had disposed of all the subdivided lots and this transaction had been completed. However, it is not unreasonable to state that had you been aware of the existence of the remnant lot you would have dealt with it in a similar manner. This is evidenced in the fact that upon re-discovery of the remnant lot you proceeded to deal with it in the same manner as you would have done previously. Accordingly, but for the passage of time, the sale of this remnant lot would clearly have been considered as part of your profit making business activity.

Furthermore, you did not acquire the lot with the intention of long term holding for capital appreciation, investment or private purposes. The reason for your re-instatement was for the sole purpose of dealing with the land. The nature of that dealing can only be attributed to the original profit making intention.

Given the activities undertaken since reinstatement, we are of the view that the activities undertaken are no different to those you carried out prior to you being deregistered by ASIC. As such, we consider that the sale of the remnant lot has been supplied in the course of carrying on a business.

Consequently, we are of the view that you are carrying on an enterprise.

2. Does your GST turnover meet the registration turnover threshold?

Section 23-5 of the GST Act states:

Subsection 23-15 of the GST Act states:

Under GST regulation 23-15.01, the current registration turnover threshold is $75,000 for entities other than non-profit bodies.

Subsection 188-10(2) of the GST Act states:

Subsection 188-15(1) of the GST Act states:

As discussed above, you are carrying on an enterprise, which has a current GST turnover of more than $75,000. You intend to cease your enterprise upon settlement of the sale of the remnant lot. It is necessary to determine whether the sale of the remnant lot will lead to your projected GST turnover exceeding the GST registration turnover threshold.

Subsection 188-20(1) of the GST Act states:

Section 188-25 of the GST Act states:

In working out your *projected GST turnover, disregard:

The Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2001/7 (GSTR 2001/7) refers to the meaning of GST turnover including the effect of section 188-25 on projected GST turnover. Paragraphs 30 to 36 of the ruling state:

In your case, the remnant lot is part of the property that you acquired to subdivide for sale; hence it is your revenue asset. Consequently, such a supply will not be disregarded in working out your projected GST turnover under paragraph 188-25(a) of the GST Act.

Paragraphs 38 to 41, 46 and 47 of GSTR 2001/7 provides guidance on the meaning of 'solely as a consequence' state

In your case, you will cease to carry on your enterprise after the settlement of the sale of the remnant lot.

The disposal of the remnant lot is also not a transfer solely as a consequence of ceasing to carry on an enterprise. In such circumstances your enterprise ceases as a consequence of the disposal of the remnant lot, rather than the remnant lot being disposed of in consequence of the ceasing to carry on the enterprise.

Consequently, the supply of the remnant lot will not be disregarded in working out your projected GST turnover under subparagraph 188-25(b)(i) of the GST Act.

Therefore, your GST turnover does meet the registration turnover threshold.

3. Are you required to be registered for the GST?

As discussed in question 2 above, as your GST turnover meets the registration turnover threshold as specified in paragraph 23-5(b) of the GST Act, you are required to be registered for GST.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).