Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012146944812

Ruling

Subject: Tax deductible gifts

Question 1

Can the Rulee issue a receipt for gifts pursuant to subsection 30-228(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) for contributions received in the form of Sponsorships 1, 2 and 3 for an annual fundraising gala ball?

Answer:

No.

Question 2

Can the Rulee issue receipts for gifts pursuant to subsection 30-228(1) of the ITAA 1997 for donations received in the form of Sponsorships 4 and 5 for an annual fundraising gala ball?

Answer:

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ending 30 June 2013

The scheme commences on:

12 October 2012

Relevant facts and circumstances

This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.

1. The Rulee is endorsed as a deductible gift recipient.

2. The Rulee will hold a gala ball to raise funds and public awareness.

3. The charity gala ball will include drinks and canapés on arrival, a three course dinner, live entertainment, silent auction, guest speakers, presentation on personal stories and an opportunity to meet staff, board members, major donors, corporate supporters, political figures and members of the community.

4. The Rulee will offer the following sponsorship packages:

5. Sponsorships 1 and 2 will be formalised in a written sponsorship agreement. Sponsorship 3 has the option of a formal written agreement.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Division 30 and

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 30-228(1).

Reasons for decision

Question1

Summary

As specified in subsection 30-228(1) of the ITAA 1997 a deductible gift recipient (DGR) may issue a receipt for a gift. Because the sponsors receive material benefits in return for the sponsorship fee it is not considered a gift. Therefore, money provided to the Rulee for the Sponsorships 1, 2 and 3 are not tax deductible gifts under Division 30 of the ITAA 1997 and the Rulee cannot issue a tax deductible receipt for such transactions. However, the subscription fees may be income tax deductible as business expenses for the donors.

Detailed reasoning

Subsection 30-228(1) of the ITAA 1997 states that if a DGR issues a receipt for a gift, the receipt must state the name and ABN of the deductible gift recipient and the fact that the receipt is for a gift.

The term 'gift' is not defined in the ITAA 1997. For the purposes of Division 30 of the ITAA 1997 the word 'gift' has its ordinary meaning.

Rather than attempting a definition of gift, the courts have described a gift as having the following characteristics and features:

Taxation Ruling TR 2005/13 Income Tax: tax deductible gifts - what is a gift explains what is a gift for the purposes of the gift deduction provisions in terms of these principles drawn from case law.

Paragraph 15 of TR 2005/13 states:

Transfer of money or property

The making of a gift to a DGR involves the transfer of beneficial interest in money or property to that DGR. In the simplest cases this involves the delivery of money or goods to the DGR.

Voluntary transfer

The case authorities make it clear that for a transfer of property to be a gift it must be made voluntarily. A transfer will be voluntary if it is 'the act and will of the disponor and there was nothing to interfere with or control the exercise of that will' (Cyprus Mines Corporation v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation 78 ATC 4468 at 4481; (1978) 9 ATR 33 at 48).

A transfer is not made voluntarily if it is made for consideration or because of a prior obligation imposed on the giver by statute or by contract or where the purported gift has the effect of discharging or reducing a prior contractual obligation of the giver's associate.

Benefaction

An essential attribute of a gift is that benefaction is intended, and in fact conferred on the recipient. Conferring benefaction means that the DGR is advantaged in a material sense, to the extent of the property transferred to them, without any countervailing detriment arising from the terms of the transfer.

An obvious example of a transfer that is not by way of benefaction is where the giver merely makes a payment in order to receive services from the DGR. The DGR has the obligation of performing or providing the services. Generally, such payments also fail to be gifts because they are not voluntary and they provide material benefits to the giver.

If any liability or obligation falling on the DGR as a result of the transfer of property is material the transfer is not a gift.

No material benefit returned

In order to constitute a gift, the giver must not receive a benefit or an advantage of a material nature by way of return. It does not matter whether the material benefit or advantage comes from the DGR or another party.

The giver may still be regarded as having received a material benefit in a case where the value of the benefit to the giver is less than the value of the property transferred. In these circumstances it is not accepted that the value of the benefit received can be notionally deducted from the value of the property transferred and the net balance claimed as a gift. No part of the property transferred is considered a gift.

It is a question of fact in each case whether any benefit or advantage is considered material. A benefit or advantage can be material if there is a link between the benefit and the transfer, and the benefit is sufficiently significant in relation to the value of the transfer.

Paragraphs 43 and 44 of TR 2005/13 provide examples of what benefits are considered material and nonmaterial.

Information received about the DGR and its activities is unlikely to be a material benefit.

The public recognition accorded to givers will commonly not be a material benefit. This includes mere acknowledgement in newsletters, annual reports, on a donors' board, and so on. As Bowen CJ said in Leary v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1980) (Leary), 'a man may, by his gifts, gain fame or formal honours without losing his tax deductions'.

On the other hand, recognition accorded to the giver for purposes of commercial advertising is a material benefit. Sponsorships of DGRs by commercial entities generally fall into this category. Such outgoings, however, may be income tax deductible as business expenses. Paragraph 195 of TR 2005/13 provides the following example:

The amount of the gift cannot be split from the amount paid in respect of the material benefit. Paragraphs 149 and 150 of TR 2005/13 explain:

Sponsorship packages

The Rulee offers a variety of sponsorship opportunities. Each sponsorship package involves a payment of money to the Rulee.

The Sponsorships 1, 2 and 3 all include the following benefits:

Sponsorships 1 and 2 also include additional branding and recognition benefits:

With each type of sponsorship money will be transferred to the Rulee. Therefore, there is a transfer of beneficial interest. Sponsorships are taken up by donors voluntarily and not as a result of any prior contractual obligations.

The transfer of the sponsorship fee to the Rulee materially advantages the Rulee. In return for the sponsorship fee the sponsors receive an advantage in the form of branding and commercial advertising opportunities. These entitlements to commercial advertising and branding in relation to the event are formalised in a written agreement between the Rulee and the sponsor. A formal agreement is optional for Sponsorship 3.

The obligation on the part of the Rulee to provide commercial advertising and branding is material. Therefore, even though the Rulee materially benefits from the sponsorship fee, it is not made by way of benefaction.

There is a clear link between the benefits received by the sponsor and the amount transferred to The Rulee. The Sponsorship 1 is available for the greatest fee and has the most benefits, especially in terms of corporate branding. The Sponsorship 2 has fewer benefits and this is reflected in the lesser fee amount. Again, Sponsorship 3 is less again and entitles the donor to fewer advertising benefits.

Mere public recognition of the donors, such as acknowledgement of their support in the Annual Report, event speeches and website are not considered material benefits. Likewise, educational opportunities provided by the Rulee to donors about their work are also immaterial.

However, other benefits such as tickets to the gala, membership and corporate branding and recognition on event material are considered a material benefit.

All of the benefits are offered as a package in return for a specified sponsorship fee so must be considered as an arrangement as a whole.

The fact that these benefits are offered by the DGR as an inducement to potential givers, there is public recognition for purposes of commercial advertising for the giver and membership rights and privileges are obtained as a result of transfer indicate that these benefits are material.

Because the sponsors receive material benefits in return for the sponsorship fee and it is not provided by way of benefaction, it is not considered a gift.

Therefore, money provided to the Rulee for the Sponsorships 1, 2 and 3 are not tax deductible gifts under Division 30 of the ITAA 1997 and the Rulee cannot issue a tax deductible receipt for such transactions.

Question 2

Summary

As specified in subsection 30-228(1) of the ITAA 1997 a DGR may issue a receipt for a gift. Sponsorship fees for Sponsorships 4 and 5 transferred to the Rulee will be a gift. The Rulee may therefore issue a receipt pursuant to subsection 30-228(1) of the ITAA 1997 to a donor who transfers money for these sponsorships.

Detailed reasoning

As discussed above, to qualify as a gift for the purposes of Division 30 and subsection 30-228(1) of the ITAA 1997, the following features must be present:

The Rulee offers various types of sponsorship for its gala ball. Both Sponsorships 4 and 5 require the voluntary payment of a sponsorship fee. The money derived from these fees will be used by the Rulee to fund their charitable operations.

Thus the sponsorship packages satisfy the first three characteristic of a gift.

No material benefit returned

As already discussed in question one, in order to constitute a gift, the giver must not receive a benefit or an advantage of a material nature by way of return. Only advantages or benefits that are material will affect whether a transfer is a gift. Benefits that are minor or negligible will not prevent the transfer from being a gift.

Paragraph 186 of TR 2005/13 states:

186. The public recognition accorded to givers will commonly not be a material benefit. This includes mere acknowledgement in newsletters, annual reports, on a donors' board, and so on. As Bowen CJ said in Leary, 'a man may, by his gifts, gain fame or formal honours without losing his tax deductions'.

The Sponsorship 4 differs from the other types of sponsorships offered. This sponsorship provides an opportunity for one financially disadvantaged person to attend the gala. In return for this the sponsor receives the following:

The Sponsorship 5 does not incur a sponsorship fee. This type of sponsorship is for those that cannot attend the event but wish to make a donation. The amount of donation is unspecified. In return for the donation the sponsor will have their name, or company name, listed in the souvenir programme for the event and also receive a personal copy of the program.

The recognition of Sponsorships 4 and 5 in the event programme, annual reports and website is considered immaterial and does not prevent the donation from being a gift for the purposes of Division 30 of the ITAA 1997. The Rulee can issue a receipt for a gift for amounts transferred to them for these sponsorships.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).