Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012171365427

Ruling

Subject: GST and acquisition of business assets

Question

Are you entitled to input tax credits on the purchase of the Assets?

Answer

Yes.

Facts

You are in the process of purchasing a manufacturing business.

You are registered for GST

You are named in the asset sale agreement as the Buyer. The Asset Sellers are members of a GST group all of whom are in liquidation. The asset sale agreement also contains the following:

The call option document, between the Land Seller and the Asset Sellers, states that the Land Seller is the registered owner of the Property. The Land Seller grants the Asset Sellers the call option to enable the Asset Sellers to require the Land Seller to sell the Property to the Asset Sellers. The call option document also contains the following:

The land sale agreement provides that the present use of the Property is 'residence and factory'.

The section under tenancies is marked 'Not Applicable'. The purchase price is listed as $B. The land sale agreement also contains the following:

The Asset Sellers are conducting the manufacturing activities from the Property.

You are not aware of any lease agreement on the Property between the Land Seller and the Asset Sellers. In addition, you are not aware of any rent payable by the Asset Sellers for the use of the Property.

The Asset Sellers are registered for GST.

Currently there is no agreement in writing stating that the sale is a GST-free supply of a going concern.

On the completion of the asset sale agreement, you and the Property Buyer will execute a lease on the Property.

You and the Property Buyer are related entities.

The Asset Sellers and the Land Seller are related entities.

Relevant legislative provisions

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Section 9-5

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Section 11-5.

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Section 38-325.

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Subsection 38-325(1).

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Subsection 38-325(2).

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Section 195-1.

Reasons for decision

Summary

You are entitled to claim an input tax credit on the purchase of the Assets as the supply to you, in the circumstances described, is not a GST-free supply of a going concern.

Detailed reasoning

Section 11-20 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act) provides that you are entitled to the input tax credit for any creditable acquisition that you make.

Section 11-5 of the GST Act states:

You make a creditable acquisition if:

(* denotes a term defined in section 195-1 of the GST Act)

You acquire a thing for a creditable purpose to the extent that you acquire it in carrying on your enterprise. However, you do not acquire the thing for a creditable purpose to the extent that the acquisition relates to making input taxed supplies or the acquisition is of a private or domestic nature.

On the information provided, you acquire the Assets for a creditable purpose as no part of the acquisition is of a private or domestic nature or relates to making input taxed supplies. You provide or are liable to provide consideration for the supply and you are registered for GST. Accordingly, the acquisition meets the requirements of paragraphs 11-5(a), 11-5(c) and 11-5(d) of the GST Act.

Therefore, what needs to be determined is whether the supply of the Assets to you is a taxable supply as required by paragraph 11-5(b) of the GST Act.

Whether or not a supply is a taxable supply is determined by the supplier's circumstances.

A supplier will make a taxable supply if all of the requirements of section 9-5 of the GST Act are met. Under section 9-5 of the GST Act, the supply is a taxable supply if:

However, the supply is not a taxable supply to the extent that it is GST-free or input taxed.

Based on the information provided, the requirements of paragraphs 9-5(a) to 9-5(d) of the GST Act are met by the Asset Sellers. This is because the Asset Sellers sell the Assets for consideration, the supply is made in the course or furtherance of their enterprise, the supply is connected with Australia and the Asset Sellers are registered for GST.

The sale of the Assets is not an input taxed supply under any provision of the GST Act or any other Act. Therefore, what is left to consider is whether the supply of the Assets is GST-free.

Section 38-325 of the GST Act provides that, if certain conditions are satisfied, a supply of a going concern is GST-free. This means that, in the case of a supply which would otherwise be a taxable supply, or an input taxed supply, the supply is GST-free if it is supplied under an arrangement for the supply of a going concern.

Section 38-325 of the GST Act states:

1) The *supply of a going concern is GST-free if:

2) A supply of a going concern is a supply under an arrangement under which:

In order to determine whether the sale of the Assets is a GST-free supply of a going concern, firstly, it needs to be determined whether the sale is in fact a supply of a going concern under subsection 38-325(2) of the GST Act.

Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2002/5 explains what is a supply of a going concern for the purposes of the GST Act. This ruling also explains when the supply of a going concern is GST-free.

Given the facts of this case, paragraph 15 of GSTR 2002/5 provides that for the purposes of the definition of supply of a going concern, it is not a supply in itself which must satisfy the conditions of paragraph 38-325(2)(a) and (b), but the arrangement under which a supply is made. There may be several supplies, each of which is a supply of a going concern under the one arrangement.

When two entities sell their enterprises to two recipients and the contracts are interdependent, each supply must be considered separately. When both supplies occur on the same day, each enterprise which is the subject of the separate supplies must be capable of continued operation by the purchasers.

The asset sale agreement provides that this document and the land sale agreement are interdependent. The completion of this document is conditional upon simultaneous settlement of the land sale agreement.

The operation of separate enterprises is outlined in each of these agreements. Hence, we need to determine if the sale as outlined in the asset sale agreement satisfies the requirements of a GST-free supply of a going concern.

GSTR 2002/5 considers the meaning of the phrase 'all of the things that are necessary for the continued operation of an enterprise'. In particular, paragraphs 73, 74 and 75 state:

In this case, the business conducted by the Asset Sellers is manufacturing. The asset sale agreement includes the transfer of assets used in the manufacturing activities. Included in the sale are the listed assets, the business names, the domain names, the trademarks, the plant and equipment, motor vehicles and the intellectual property. The sale also includes the assignment of the benefits of contracts.

The business is conducted from the Property under the Asset Sellers' arrangement with the owner, the Land Seller, who is an entity related to the Asset Sellers.

As mentioned above, one of the assets necessary for the continued operation of an enterprise would include, where appropriate, premises. Paragraphs 90 to 99 of GSTR 2002/5 discuss premises that are necessary. In particular paragraphs 91 and 92 of GSTR 2002/5 state:

Paragraph 94 and 95 of GSTR 2002/5 contains an example when premises are necessary for the continued operation of an enterprise.

Furthermore, paragraph 58 of GSTR 2002/5 refers to the supply of a right to occupy premises and states:

In this case, as the business is the manufacture of goods, the business requires premises where the activities can be conducted. We consider that in the given circumstances, premises are one of the things that are necessary for the continued operation of the particular enterprise.

You advised that you are not aware of any lease agreement on the Property between the Land Seller and the Asset Sellers. In addition, you are not aware of any rent payable by the Asset Sellers for the use of the Property.

In this case, the Asset Sellers are occupying the Property under a tenancy at will arrangement as the Asset Sellers occupy the Property without any agreement as to the duration of the occupancy or any payment of rent.

Paragraphs 64 to 70 of GSTR 2002/5 deal with periodic tenancies and tenancies at will arrangements. Paragraph 64 states:

As the Asset Sellers are occupying the Property under a tenancy at will they do not have a legally enforceable right to occupy the premises and are unable to assign to you any rights in relation to the use of the Property.

The asset sale agreement provides that the Asset Sellers have exercised the call option relating to the purchase of the Property and have nominated the Property Buyer to purchase the property. The Asset and Land sale agreements are interdependent and will settle simultaneously. The sale of the Property is without any existing tenancies and vacant possession is required.

You have advised that on the date of the supply, the Property Buyer will execute a lease to you of the Property. However, the Asset Sellers have not surrendered a lease as they do not have an enforceable right to occupy the premises and they have not facilitated your entry into a lease of the premises with the Property Buyer. Rather you will be negotiating with the Property Buyer for the supply of the premises to you.

Hence, the Asset Sellers are not supplying the premises to you.

As stated in paragraph 41 of GSTR 2002/5 the ability of the purchaser to provide some of the things necessary for the continued operation of the enterprise is not a relevant factor.

As the Asset Sellers are not supplying the premises, the Asset Sellers will not be suppling to you all of the things that are necessary for the continued operation of the identified enterprise. Therefore, the sale of the Assets by the Asset Sellers to you will not meet the requirement in paragraph 38-325(2)(a) of the GST Act. Consequently, the sale of the Assets by the Asset Sellers will not be a supply of a going concern under subsection 38-325(2) of the GST Act.

Furthermore, the requirement in paragraph 38-325(1)(c) of the GST Act is also not satisfied as the Asset Sellers and you have not agreed in writing that the supply is of a going concern.

Accordingly, the sale as outlined in the asset sale agreement is not a GST-free supply of a going concern under subsection 38-325(1) of the GST Act.

On the information provided, what you will be acquiring is effectively assets only rather than an enterprise.

The sale of the Assets is not GST-free under any other provisions in the GST Act or another Act. Therefore, based on the information provided, as all the requirements of section 9-5 of the GST Act are satisfied, the supply to you is a taxable supply and the requirement of paragraph 11-5(b) of the GST Act is met.

As the acquisition meets all the requirements of section 11-5 of the GST Act, you are making a creditable acquisition. Therefore, you are entitled to an input tax credits on the purchase of the Assets.

You should note that there is no authority for the Commissioner in the administration of the GST Act to overlook the incorrect GST treatment of business to business transactions on the basis that the overall effect of the transactions is revenue neutral. To do so would conflict with the structure of the tax and undermine its integrity.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).