Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012241128136

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.

Ruling

Subject: Fringe Benefits Tax - remote housing benefit

Question 1

Will the provision of housing to employees be an exempt benefit under subsection 58ZC(1) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA)?

Answer

Yes

Question 2

Can the value of the expense payment benefit that arises from the reimbursement of the home loan interest be reduced under subsection 60(2) of the FBTAA?

Answer

Yes

Question 3

Can the value of an expense payment benefit that arises from the payment of rental expenses be reduced under subsection 60(2A) of the FBTAA?

Answer

Yes

Question 4

Can the value of the benefit arising from the reimbursement or supply of residential fuel be reduced under section 59 of the FBTAA?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following periods:

1 April 2012 - 31 March 2013

1 April 2013 - 31 March 2014

1 April 2014 - 31 March 2015

The scheme commences on:

1 April 2012

Relevant facts and circumstances

You operate a business providing products and services to various industries through your branches throughout Australia.

You have branches that are located in remote towns. These branches provide product and services predominately to the mining and mining related industries.

You require staff that have specialised skills. In order to retain existing staff and attract new staff of the required calibre in your remote branches you are considering offering them a range of benefits.

The benefits you are considering are:

· the use of accommodation by leasing or acquiring residential premises in the remote area and allowing employees to use as their usual place of residence. No novation of existing agreements held by employees will be entered into

· the reimbursement of the whole or part of the employee's rental expenses of residential premises

· the reimbursement of the employee's interest on housing loans

· the supply of or reimbursement of the whole or part of the cost electricity, gas or other residential fuel for the accommodation.

You propose to offer the benefits as there is a shortage of suitable accommodation in the remote towns. You are considering acquiring or leasing suitable accommodation in these locations as it becomes available.

The benefits will be provided only to employees, not jointly with associates.

The benefits may be provided by allowing salary packaging of these benefits under the terms of a salary sacrifice arrangement (SSA) agreed upon and documented before any benefits are paid and before the work is performed.

You advise that the provision of housing assistance in remote locations is a common feature in industries conducting business where there are mining activities.

You have advised of an article published in a rural paper for the area in which your branch is located which indicates that it is customary for employers in the region to provide these benefits.

Relevant legislative provisions

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Section 20

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Section 25

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Section 58ZC

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Section 59

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 60(2)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 60(2A)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 140

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 140(1)(b)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 140(1A)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 142(1)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 142(1A)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 142(2E)

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Will the provision of housing to employees be an exempt benefit under subsection 58ZC(1) of the FBTAA?

You propose to lease or acquire residential properties in the towns in which your remote branches are located to allow employees to use the premises as their usual place of residence.

In determining whether the proposed benefit will be exempt it is first necessary to determine the category of benefit that will be provided. Within the FBTAA there are thirteen different categories of benefits. Each category has its own valuation rules and most categories specify certain benefits that are exempt benefits.

Section 25 of the FBTAA provides that a housing benefit arises from the provision of the use of a residential property by an employee where the property is the employee's usual place of residence.

As you will provide your employees with the use of residential premises for their usual place of residence, the benefit will be a housing benefit.

Will the provision of a housing benefit be an exempt benefit?

Under section 58ZC of the FBTAA a housing benefit that is provided to a current employee will be an exempt benefit where certain conditions are met.

Subsection 58ZC(2) of the FBTAA sets out the conditions that need to be satisfied for a housing benefit to be a remote area housing benefit. It states:

· A housing benefit in relation to an employer for a year of tax and for a unit of accommodation, being a benefit provided to an employee of the employer in respect of the employee's employment, is a remote area housing benefit if:

· during the whole of the tenancy period, the unit of accommodation was located in a State or internal Territory and was not at a location in, or adjacent to, an eligible urban area; and

· it would be concluded that it was necessary for the employer, during the year of tax, to provide, or to arrange for the provision of, residential accommodation for employees of the employer because:

· the nature of the employer's business was such that employees of the employer were liable to be frequently required to change their places of residence; or

· there was not, at or near the place or places at which the employees of the employer were employed, sufficient suitable residential accommodation for those employees (other than residential accommodation provided by or on behalf of the employer); or

· it is customary for employers in the industry in which the recipient was employed during the tenancy period to provide residential accommodation for their employees free of charge or for a rent or other consideration that is less than the market value of the right to occupy or use the accommodation concerned; and

· the recipients overall housing right was not granted to the recipient under:

· a non-arm's length arrangement; or

· an arrangement that was entered into by any of the parties to the arrangement for the purpose, or for purposes that included the purpose, of enabling the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of this section.

To summarise the conditions to be met are:

· the accommodation is in a remote area

· the usual place of employment of the employee is in a remote area

· it is necessary for the employer to provide, or arrange for the provision of residential accommodation for employees for one of the following three reasons:

· the nature of the employer's business is such that employees are liable to move frequently from one residential location to another, or

· there is insufficient suitable residential accommodation otherwise available at or near the place where the employee is employed, or

· it is customary for employers in the employer's industry to provide free or subsidised accommodation for employees, and

· the housing benefit is not granted to the employee under:

· a non-arm's length arrangement, or

· an arrangement entered into by any of the parties for purposes that included the purpose of enabling the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of the exemption

Is the accommodation located in a remote area?

A remote area is one that is not located in or adjacent to an eligible urban area. Section 140 of the FBTAA contains two definitions of eligible urban areas.

The first definition contained within paragraph 140(1)(b) of the FBTAA is used in relation to:

· a housing benefit by most employers; and

· other benefits by all employers.

Our fact sheet Fringe benefits tax - remote areas provides a list of towns which are considered to be either located in a remote area or a non-remote area.

The towns in which your remote branches are located are listed as being located in remote areas.

Therefore, this condition is satisfied.

Is the usual place of employment of the employee in a remote area?

The usual place of employment of the employees is in the towns in which your remote branches are located. As discussed above, these are in a remote area.

Therefore this condition is satisfied.

Is it necessary for you to provide or arrange the provision of residential accommodation for one of the listed reasons?

Of the three reasons that are listed, the most relevant reason is the second reason.

You have advised that:

· there is a shortage of suitable accommodation in the towns in which your remote branches are located

· you need to attract staff with specialist skills

· you compete with mining companies for suitable employees and need to offer similar assistance and benefits to attract and retain the employees

· the provision of housing assistance is common in industries providing services to the mining and associated industries in remote areas.

Therefore it can be concluded that it is necessary for you to provide accommodation for your employees.

Is the accommodation provided under a non-arm's length arrangement or as part of an arrangement entered into by any of the parties for the purpose, or for purposes that included the purpose, of enabling the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of this section?

ATO Interpretative Decision ATO ID 2005/156 Fringe Benefits Tax: Exempt Benefits: remote area housing - non-arm's length arrangement discusses what is meant by the expression non-arm's length arrangement and states:

Within subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA, the expression 'non-arm's length arrangement' is defined to mean an arrangement other than an arm's length arrangement. The term 'arm's length arrangement' is not defined in the FBTAA. However section 136(1) defines 'arm's length transaction' to mean a transaction where the parties to the transaction are dealing with each other at arm's length in relation to the transaction.

The expression 'at arm's length' is defined in The CCH Macquarie Concise Dictionary of Modern Law , 1988, CCH Australia Ltd/ Macquarie Library Pty Ltd, Sydney as meaning that the parties to a transaction are not connected in such a way as to bring into question the ability of one to act independently of the other.

In Granby Pty Ltd v. FCT (1995) 30 ATR 400; 95 ATC 4240, where the expression 'dealing with each other at arm's length' in section 160ZH of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 was in question, Lee J said (at ATR 403; ATC 4243):

The expression "dealing with each other at arm's length" involves an analysis of the manner in which the parties to a transaction conducted themselves in forming that transaction. What is asked is whether the parties behaved in the manner in which parties at arm's length would be expected to behave in conducting their affairs. Of course, it is relevant to that enquiry to determine the nature of the relationship between the parties, for if the parties are not parties at arm's length the inference may be drawn that they did not deal with each other at arm's length.

In your situation it is necessary to provide accommodation to your employees due to the shortage of suitable accommodation in the towns in which your remote branches are located and the necessity to compete with other industries to both attract and retain suitably qualified employees.

You have stated that there will be no novation of existing rental agreements held by employees will be entered into.

We therefore agree that the accommodation was not provided under a non-arm's length arrangement or for a purpose that allows you to obtain a benefit from the application of subsection 58ZC(2) of the FBTAA.

This conclusion will also apply to the accommodation provided under a salary sacrifice arrangement.

ATO Interpretative Decision ATO ID 2010/182 Fringe benefits tax: exempt benefits - remote area housing benefits - salary sacrifice arrangement discusses the circumstances where the provision of remote are housing benefits under a salary sacrifice arrangement was entered into for the employer to obtain a benefit. It states:

Under subparagraph 58ZC(2)(e)(ii) of the FBTAA, the granting of the 'recipients overall housing right' to the recipient under an 'arrangement' refers to the granting of the lease or licence to the employee to use the house or unit of accommodation as the usual place of residence under an arrangement, scheme or undertaking.

Subparagraph 58ZC(2)(e)(ii) of the FBTAA requires that the parties to the arrangement enter into the arrangement for the purpose, or for purposes that included the purpose, of enabling the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of the section.

In Newton v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1958) 98 CLR 1; (1958) 11 ATD 442; (1958) 7 AITR 298, the Privy Council examined the meaning of the word 'purpose'.

Lord Denning said at page number CLR 8; ATD 445; AITR 304,

The word "purpose" means, not motive, but the effect which is sought to achieve - the end in view.

Lord Denning also said (at the same page),

In order to bring an arrangement within the section, you must be able to predicate by looking at the overt acts by which it was implemented that it was implemented in that particular way so as to avoid tax. If you cannot so predicate, but have to acknowledge that the transactions are capable of explanation by reference to ordinary business or family dealing, without necessarily being labelled as a means to avoid tax, then the arrangement does not come within the section.

In this arrangement which provides or grants the 'recipient's overall housing right', the arrangement is entered into by each of the parties for the purpose of enabling the employer to provide the benefit of housing to its employee. There are no overt acts by which one could predicate that the arrangement has been implemented by any of the parties for the purpose of allowing the employer to enjoy the benefits of the tax exemption. The arrangement can be explained as being one of ordinary business dealings as is customary in the employer's industry.

Accordingly, the recipient's overall housing right was not granted to an employee under an arrangement described in subparagraph 58ZC(2)(e)(ii) of the FBTAA. Subparagraph 58ZC(2)(e)(ii) is not satisfied.

This situation is similar to yours. We therefore consider that where the accommodation is provided under a valid salary sacrifice arrangement, it will not be provided under a non-arm's length arrangement, or for a purpose that allows you to obtain a benefit from the application of subsection 58ZC(2) of the FBTAA

Conclusion

As all of the conditions detailed in subsection 58ZC(2) of the FBTAA are satisfied, the provision of accommodation to employees located in at your remote branches is a remote area housing benefit and therefore an exempt benefit.

Question 2

Can the value of the expense payment benefit that arises from the reimbursement of the home loan interest be reduced under subsection 60(2) of the FBTAA?

You propose to reimburse your employees interest incurred on remote area housing loans.

Subsection 60(2) of the FBTAA provides for a 50% reduction of the taxable value of expense payment fringe benefits in respect of remote area housing loan interest payment where all the conditions in that subsection are satisfied.

Subsection 60(2) of the FBTAA states:

Where:

the recipient of an expense payment fringe benefit in relation to an employer in relation to a year of tax is an employee of the employer;

the amount that, but for this subsection, would be the taxable value of the fringe benefit in relation to the year of tax shall be reduced by 50% of so much of that amount as relates to the occupation period.

In summary the value of the benefit can be reduced where:

· the benefit is an expense payment fringe benefit

· the employees expenditure is in respect of interest on a remote area housing loan connected with a dwelling

· the employee occupied the dwelling as his or her usual place of residence, and

· the benefit was not provided:

· under a non-arm's length arrangement, or

· under an arrangement entered into by any of the parties for purposes that included the purpose of enabling the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of the reduction.

Will the benefit be an expense payment fringe benefit?

Section 20 of the FBTAA states:

Where a person (in this section referred to as the "provider"):

· makes a payment in discharge, in whole or in part, of an obligation of another person (in this section referred to as the "recipient") to pay an amount to a third person in respect of expenditure incurred by the recipient; or

· reimburses another person (in this section also referred to as the "recipient"), in whole or in part, in respect of an amount of expenditure incurred by the recipient;

· the making of the payment referred to in paragraph (a), or the reimbursement referred to in paragraph (b), shall be taken to constitute the provision of a benefit by the provider to the recipient.

As you will reimburse your employees for the interest incurred on their housing loans the benefit will be an expense payment fringe benefit under section 20 of the FBTAA.

Will the employee's expenditure be in respect of interest on a remote area housing loan for a dwelling?

The term 'dwelling' is defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA as 'a unit of accommodation constituted by, or contained in a building, being a unit that consists, in whole or a substantial part, of residential accommodation.'

You are proposing to pay the interest expenses incurred by your employees, located at your remote branches, arising from their residential housing loans.

A remote area housing loan is defined in subsection 142(1) of the FBTAA as follows:

In this Act, a reference, in relation to a year of tax in relation to an employee of an employer, to a remote area housing loan connected with a dwelling is a reference to a housing loan relating to the dwelling where:

during the whole of the period (in this subsection referred to as the ``occupation period'') in the year of tax when the employee occupied or used the dwelling as his or her usual place of residence:

the dwelling was situated in a State or internal Territory and was not at a location in, or adjacent to, an eligible urban area; and

the employee was a current employee of the employer and the usual place of employment of the employee was not at a location in, or adjacent to, an eligible urban area;

In summary the conditions to be met are:

· the dwelling must be the employee's usual place of residence

· the residence must be in a remote area

· the employee's usual place of employment must be in a remote area

· the common conditions set out in subsection (2E) are satisfied, and

· (c) the benefit was not provided:

· under a non-arm's length arrangement, or

· under an arrangement entered into by any of the parties for purposes that included the purpose of enabling the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of the reduction.

Will the dwelling be the employee's usual place of residence?

You have stated that the dwellings will be the usual place of residence for your employees.

(i) Will the residence be located in a remote area?

As discussed above the towns in which you have your remote branches are considered to be located in a remote area.

(ii) Will the employee's usual place of employment be located in a remote area?

As per the discussion in question 1 above, the employees' usual place of employment will be in the towns in which you have your remote branches.

(b) Will the common conditions stated in subsection 142(2E) of the FBTAA be met

The common conditions in subsection 142(2E) of the FBTAA are stated as follows:

For the purposes of the application of this section to a fringe benefit in relation to a year of tax in relation to an employee of an employer, the common conditions in relation to a particular period or in relation to a particular time are as follows:

· it is customary for employers in the industry in which the employee was employed during that period or at that time, as the case may be, to provide housing assistance for their employees;

· it would be concluded that it was necessary for the employer, during the year of tax, to provide or arrange for the provision of housing assistance for employees of the employer because:

· the nature of the employer's business was such that employees of the employer were liable to be frequently required to change their places of residence;

· there was not, at or near the place or places at which the employees of the employer were employed, sufficient suitable residential accommodation for those employees (other than residential accommodation provided by or on behalf of the employer); or

· it is customary for employers in the industry in which the employee was employed during that period or at that time, as the case may be, to provide housing assistance for their employees.

The meaning of the phrase 'customary for employers in the industry' is discussed in Taxation Determination TD 94/97 Fringe benefits tax: what does the phrase 'customary for employers in the industry' mean in relation to the provision of fringe benefits to employees?

Paragraphs 2 and 3 of TD 94/97 state:

2. A benefit will be accepted as being customary where it is normal or common for employees of that class or job description in that industry to be provided with the same or similar benefits. It is not necessary that all or even the majority of employees in the industry receive the benefit. Where the provision of the benefit is unique, rare or unusual within an industry it would not be accepted as being customary.

3. In defining the employer's industry, this Office will accept categorisation based on any recognised industry classification system. Examples of these are the industry codes for business income used by this Office (listed in the company income tax return instructions), and Australian and New Zealand Standard Industrial Classification (ANZSIC) codes.

You advise that it is a common feature in industries conducting business in remote areas where there are mining activities, as they are required to compete for employees and need to offer similar assistance and benefits to retain and attract employees.

In support of this contention you have referred to an article from a local paper which indicates it is customary for employers in the industry you serve to provide accommodation to their employees.

You have also stated that there is a shortage of suitable accommodation in both towns in which your remote branches are located.

Therefore we agree that it is both customary and necessary for you to provide housing assistance to your employees that reside and work in a remote area.

(c) Is the accommodation provided under a non-arm's length arrangement or as part of an arrangement entered into by any of the parties for the purpose, or for purposes that included the purpose, of enabling the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of this section?

For the same reasons discussed in question 1 this condition has been met.

As all the conditions listed under subsection 142(1) of the FBTAA are satisfied the housing loan is a remote area housing loan.

Will the employee occupy or use the dwelling as their usual place of residence?

As discussed in question 1 the dwelling will be the employee's usual place of residence.

Is the accommodation provided under a non-arm's length arrangement or as part of an arrangement entered into by any of the parties for the purpose, or for purposes that included the purpose, of enabling the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of this section?

For the same reasons discussed above this condition is met.

Conclusion

The taxable value of the expense payment fringe benefit resulting from the payment of the remote area housing loan interest will qualify for reductions in taxable value available under subsection 60(2) of the FBTAA.

Question 3

Can the value of an expense payment benefit that arises from the payment of rental expenses be reduced under subsection 60(2A) of the FBTAA?

Due to a shortage of suitable accommodation in both towns in which your remote branches are located you are considering acquiring or leasing suitable properties as they become available. You then propose to allow employees to use the properties as their usual place of residence.

Subsection 60(2A) of the FBTAA provides for a 50% reduction of the taxable value of expense payment fringe benefits in respect of remote area housing rental payments where all the conditions in that subsection are satisfied.

Subsection 60(2A) of the FBTAA states as follows:

Where:

· the recipient of an expense payment fringe benefit in relation to an employer in relation to a year of tax is an employee of the employer;

· the recipients expenditure is in respect of remote area housing rent connected with a unit of accommodation;

· the recipient occupied or used the unit of accommodation as his or her usual place of residence during a period (in this subsection called the ``occupation period'') during which the rent accrued; and

· the fringe benefit was not provided under:

· a non-arm's length arrangement; or

· an arrangement that was entered into by any of the parties to the arrangement for the purpose, or for purposes that included the purpose, of enabling the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of this section;

· the amount that, but for this subsection, would be the taxable value of the fringe benefit in relation to the year of tax shall be reduced by 50% of so much of the recipients expenditure as relates to the occupation period.

In summary the conditions to be met are:

· the employee is in receipt of an expense payment fringe benefit

· the employee's expenditure is in respect of remote area housing rent for accommodation

· the accommodation was the employee's usual place of residence

· the benefit was not provided under:

· a non-arm's length arrangement, or

· an arrangement entered into by any of the parties for purposes that included the purpose of enabling the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of the reduction.

Will the benefit be an expense payment fringe benefit?

As discussed in question 2, where you reimburse an employee for an expense they have incurred, you will be providing an expense payment fringe benefit.

Will the employee's expenditure be in respect of remote area housing rent of their accommodation?

You have advised that you propose to reimburse your employees for their rental expenses in respect of their accommodation.

Subsection 142(1A) of the FBTAA sets out the conditions to be met for rent of accommodation to qualify as remote area housing rent. Subsection 142(1A) states:

In this Act, a reference, in relation to a year of tax in relation to an employee of an employer, to a remote area housing rent connected with a unit of accommodation is a reference to rent or other consideration payable in respect of the subsistence of a lease or licence in respect of the unit of accommodation where:

· during the whole of the period (in this subsection referred to as the ``occupation period'') in the year of tax when the employee occupied or used the unit of accommodation as his or her usual place of residence:

· the unit of accommodation was situated in a State or internal Territory and was not at a location in, or adjacent to, an eligible urban area; and

· the employee was a current employee of the employer and the usual place of employment of the employee was not at a location in, or adjacent to, an eligible urban area;

· the common conditions set out in subsection (2E) are satisfied in relation to the occupation period; and

· the lease or licence was not granted under:

· a non-arm's length arrangement; or

· an arrangement that was entered into by any of the parties to the arrangement for the purpose, or for purposes that included the purpose, of enabling the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of section 60.

In summary the conditions to be met are:

· the unit of accommodation must be the employee's usual place of residence

· the residence must be in a remote area

· the employee's usual place of employment must be in a remote area

· the common conditions set out in subsection (2E) are satisfied, and

· the benefit was not provided:

· under a non-arm's length arrangement, or

· under an arrangement entered into by any of the parties for purposes that included the purpose of enabling the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of the reduction.

The payment by you for the housing rental payments of your employees located at your remote branches will constitute remote area housing rent as all the requirements of subsection 142(1A) of the FBTAA have been satisfied.

Will the employee occupy or use the dwelling as their usual place of residence?

As discussed in question 1 the dwelling will be the employee's usual place of residence.

Is the accommodation provided under a non-arm's length arrangement or as part of an arrangement entered into by any of the parties for the purpose, or for purposes that included the purpose, of enabling the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of this section?

For the same reasons discussed above this condition is met.

Conclusion

The taxable value of the expense payment fringe benefit resulting from the payment of the remote area housing rental payments of your employees will qualify for reductions in taxable value as per subsection 60(2A) of the FBTAA.

Question 4

Can the value of the benefit arising from the reimbursement or supply of residential fuel be reduced under section 59 of the FBTAA?

You propose to either supply or reimburse your employees for the whole or part of the cost of electricity, gas or other residential fuel.

Residential fuel is defined under subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA as 'any fuel (including electricity) for use for domestic purposes.'

Section 59 of the FBTAA provides for a reduction in the taxable value of remote area residential fuel where certain conditions are met.

Remote area housing benefit

Subsection 59(1) states:

If:

residential fuel is for use:

· in connection with the recipients unit of accommodation; and

· during the subsistence of the recipients overall housing right;

· in relation to a remote area housing benefit, in relation to an employer in relation to a year of tax; and

· any of the following conditions are satisfied:

· the recipients expenditure in relation to an expense payment fringe benefit in relation to the employer in relation to the year of tax or a subsequent year of tax is in respect of the supply of that residential fuel;

· the recipients property in relation to a property fringe benefit in relation to the employer in relation to the year of tax is that residential fuel;

· the recipients benefit in relation to a residual fringe benefit in relation to the employer in relation to the year of tax is the benefit of the consumption of that residential fuel;

· the amount that, apart from this subsection and section 62, would be the taxable value of the fringe benefit referred to in paragraph (b) in relation to the year of tax is reduced by 50%.

In summary, where you reimburse or supply residential fuel, the taxable value will be reduced where:

· the employee receives a remote area housing benefit, and one of the following applies:

· the employees expenditure is in relation to an expense payment fringe benefit in respect of the provision of residential fuel

· the employee is in receipt of a property benefit that is residential fuel, or

· the employee is in receipt of a residual benefit that is residential fuel.

Will the employee receive a remote area housing benefit?

As discussed in question 1, you will be providing your employees with remote area housing benefits.

Will the benefit be an expense payment benefit, a property benefit or a residual benefit?

Where you reimburse your employees for their fuel costs you will be providing an expense payment fringe benefit.

· If you provide your employees with fuel such as coal or wood you will be providing a property fringe benefit, or

· If the fuel account for the residential property is in your name and you allow the employee to use the fuel for no cost, you will be providing a residual fringe benefit.

Therefore the 50% reduction available under subsection 59(1) of the FBTAA will apply where you supply or reimburse your employees' for the cost of their residential fuel.

Remote area housing loan

A reduction in the taxable value of the benefit that arises from the provision of residential fuel will apply under subsection 59(2) of the FBTAA where an employee is in receipt of a remote area housing loan and the conditions listed under subsection 59(2) are met.

Subsection 59(2) states:

Where:

(a) any of the following conditions are satisfied:

· the recipients expenditure in relation to an expense payment fringe benefit in relation to an employer in relation to an employee in relation to a year of tax is in respect of the supply of residential fuel;

· the recipients property in relation to a property fringe benefit in relation to an employer in relation to an employee in relation to a year of tax is residential fuel;

· the recipients benefit in relation to a residual fringe benefit in relation to an employer in relation to an employee in relation to a year of tax is the benefit of the consumption of residential fuel;

· the residential fuel is for use in connection with a dwelling during a period in the year of tax or, in a case to which subparagraph (a)(i) applies, a preceding year of tax, when the recipient of the fringe benefit occupied or used the dwelling as his or her usual place of residence and was under an obligation to repay the whole or a part of a remote area housing loan connected with the dwelling; and

· the fringe benefit was not provided under:

· a non-arm's length arrangement; or

· an arrangement that was entered into by any of the parties to the arrangement for the purpose, or for purposes that included the purpose, of enabling the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of this section;

· the amount that, but for this subsection and section 62, would be the taxable value of the fringe benefit in relation to the year of tax shall be reduced by 50%.

To summarise, the taxable value of the benefit provided to your employees can be reduced by 50% where:

· you provide an expense payment fringe benefit, a property benefit or a residual benefit in relation to the supply or provision of residential fuel

· the residential fuel is for use in connection with the employees usual place of residence for which the employee has an obligation to repay a remote area housing loan, and

· the benefit was not provided:

· under a non-arm's length arrangement, or

· under an arrangement entered into by any of the parties for purposes that included the purpose of enabling the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of the reduction.

Will the benefit be an expense payment benefit, a property benefit or a residual benefit?

As discussed previously you will be providing an expense payment benefit, property benefit or residual benefit when you supply or reimburse your employees for the whole or part of the cost of electricity, gas or other residential fuel

Will the residential fuel be for use in connection with the employee's usual place of residence for which the employee has an obligation to repay a remote area housing loan?

We have previously agreed at question 2, that your employees' accommodation is their usual place of residence and that their housing loan is considered to be a remote area housing loan.

Is the benefit provided under a non-arm's length arrangement or as part of an arrangement entered into by any of the parties for the purpose, or for purposes that included the purpose, of enabling the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of this section?

For the same reasons as were discussed previously it is accepted that the supply or reimbursement of an employees residential fuel will not occur under a non-arm's length arrangement, or an arrangement entered into b any of the parties for purposes that include the purpose of enabling you to obtain the 50% reduction

Conclusion

As all the conditions listed under subsection 59(2) will be met the taxable value of the expense payment fringe benefit, property fringe benefit or residual fringe benefit can be reduced.

Remote area housing rent

A reduction in the taxable value of the benefit that arises from the provision of residential fuel will apply under subsection 59(3) of the FBTAA where an employee's expenditure is in respect of remote area housing rent and the conditions listed under subsection 59(3) are met.

Subsection 59(3) states:

Where:

any of the following conditions are satisfied:

· the recipients expenditure in relation to an expense payment fringe benefit in relation to an employer in relation to an employee in relation to a year of tax is in respect of the supply of residential fuel;

· the recipients property in relation to a property fringe benefit in relation to an employer in relation to an employee in relation to a year of tax is residential fuel;

· the recipients benefit in relation to a residual fringe benefit in relation to an employer in relation to an employee in relation to a year of tax is the benefit of the consumption of residential fuel;

· the residential fuel is for use in connection with a unit of accommodation during a period in the year of tax or, in a case to which subparagraph (a)(i) applies, in a preceding year of tax, during which:

· the recipient of the fringe benefit occupied or used the unit of accommodation as his or her usual place of residence; and

· remote area housing rent connected with the unit of accommodation accrued; and

· the fringe benefit was not provided under:

· a non-arm's length arrangement; or

· an arrangement that was entered into by any of the parties to the arrangement for the purpose, or for purposes that included the purpose, of enabling the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of this section;

· the amount that, but for this subsection and section 62, would be the taxable value of the fringe benefit in relation to the year of tax shall be reduced by 50%.

To summarise, the taxable value of the benefit provided to your employees can be reduced by 50% where:

· you provide an expense payment fringe benefit, a property benefit or a residual benefit in relation to the supply or provision of residential fuel

· the residential fuel is for use in connection with the employees usual place of residence for which remote area housing rent has accrued, and

· the benefit was not provided:

· under a non-arm's length arrangement, or

· under an arrangement entered into by any of the parties for purposes that included the purpose of enabling the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of the reduction.

Will the benefit be an expense payment benefit, a property benefit or a residual benefit?

As discussed previously you will be providing an expense payment benefit, property benefit or residual benefit when you supply or reimburse your employees for the whole or part of the cost of electricity, gas or other residential fuel

Will the residential fuel be for use in connection with the employee's usual place of residence for which remote area housing rent has accrued?

We have previously agreed at question 3, that your employees' accommodation is their usual place of residence and that their expenditure on their housing rent is considered to be a remote area housing rent.

Is the benefit provided under a non-arm's length arrangement or as part of an arrangement entered into by any of the parties for the purpose, or for purposes that included the purpose, of enabling the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of this section?

For the same reasons as were discussed previously it is accepted that the supply or reimbursement of an employees residential fuel will not occur under a non-arm's length arrangement, or an arrangement entered into any of the parties for purposes that include the purpose of enabling you to obtain the 50% reduction

Conclusion

As all the conditions listed under subsection 59(3) will be met the taxable value of the expense payment fringe benefit, property fringe benefit or residual fringe benefit can be reduced by 50%.

Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).