Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012253035822

Ruling

Subject: Capital gains tax concessions for small business

Question 1

Can the company apply the 15 year exemption in Subdivision 152-B of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to any capital gain made on the sale of the residential property?

Answer

No.

Question 2

Can the company apply the retirement exemption in Subdivision 152-D of the ITAA 1997 to any capital gain made on the sale of the residential property?

Answer

No.

Question 3

If an amount disregarded under the retirement exemption is rolled into the relevant individual's superannuation funds, does income tax apply when the amount is paid into the fund?

Answer

As the company does not qualify for the small business concessions, this question has not been considered.

This ruling applies for the following period:

Year ended 30 June 2013

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2011

Relevant facts and circumstances

The arrangement that is the subject of the private ruling is described below. This description is based on the following documents. These documents form part of and are to be read with this description. The relevant documents are: 

The company is owned by 2 individuals.

The individuals have an equal shareholding in the company.

The company owns a residential property.

The company uses the house both to run the business and earn rental income.

Market rent has always been paid for the part of the home that is rented out.

Parts of the property are used exclusively for rental purposes. Parts of the property are used exclusively for business purposes. Other parts of the property are used for both purposes.

Clients visit the property at times.

The company earns less money per annum from rent than from its business activities.

The company has an office at a separate location.

The individuals also work at the alternate office. This is variable and relative to workloads or client requests.

The company is a small business entity for the purpose of the small business capital gains tax concessions.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subdivision 152-A,

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 152-35,

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 152-40(1), and

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 152-40(4)(e).

Reasons for decision

Question 1

To access the small business capital gains tax (CGT) concessions in Division 152 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997), an entity must first satisfy the basic conditions in Subdivision 152-A of the ITAA 1997.

One of the basic conditions requires the relevant CGT asset to satisfy the active asset test in section 152-35 of the ITAA 1997. The meaning of an active asset is provided in subsection 152-40(1) of the ITAA 1997, which states:

However, paragraph 152-40(4)(e) of the ITAA 1997 states that an asset whose main use is to derive rent is specifically excluded from being an active asset, unless deriving rent was only temporarily the main use of the asset. Whether an asset's main use is to derive rent will depend upon the particular circumstances of each case.

The question of main use can incorporate a number of different factors, such as:

The comparative times of use of the property

The property was rented out from the time of purchase. The residential property has been used in the business for the same period that it was rented out. Therefore it is considered that this factor will not be determinative in deciding if the property was mainly used for rental or business.

The comparative income/revenue derived from the different uses of the property

While the rental income earned on the rental area of the residential property can be determined, the same cannot be said for the area of the property used in the business. This is because the company has other premises that it operates from. The income earned by the business relates to two properties used by the company. As the properties were used in a single business the individual amounts cannot be separated into the amounts applicable to each property. Therefore, this method would not provide a proper comparison as to the income/revenue generated by the different uses of the property.

The comparative areas of use of the property

Having regard to all the parts of the property and whether they are used for rental, business or both purposes, we consider that more than half of the property is used to produce rental income. Therefore, the main use of the property is in respect to the rental income and not the business income.

Application to your circumstances

In this instance neither the comparative times of use of the property nor the comparative income/revenue derived from the different uses provides a definitive answer to the question of whether the property was excluded from being an active asset because the main use was to derive rent. However, the comparative areas of use of the property indicate that the main use of the property is to derive rental income.

As the main use of the property was to derive rental income, the property is excluded from being an active asset under paragraph 152-40(4)(e) of the ITAA 1997.

As the property does not satisfy the active asset test, the company does not satisfy the basic conditions and is therefore not eligible to access the small business 15 year exemption.

Question 2

As the company does not satisfy the basic conditions, it is not entitled to apply the retirement exemption.

Question 3

As the company does not satisfy the basic conditions and is not entitled to the retirement exemption, this question has not been considered.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).