| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012329038208
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.
Ruling
Subject: Deductions - card payment fees
Question:
Are you entitled to claim a deduction for the card payment fees related to your pay as you go (PAYG) instalments?
Answer:
No
This ruling applies for the following period:
Year ended 30 June 2012
The scheme commences on:
01 July 2011
Relevant facts and circumstances
You are a sole trader.
You paid your quarterly business activity statements (BAS) with your credit card.
Your BAS liabilities relate to your PAYG withholding for your employee and your PAYG instalments.
You incurred card payment fees for these transactions.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 8-1
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 25-5
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 25-5(1)(a)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 25-5(2)(c)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 25-25(1)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 995-1
Reasons for decision
Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income except to the extent that they are of a capital, private or domestic nature, or relate to the earning of exempt income.
A number of significant court decisions have determined that, for an expense to satisfy the tests in section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997, it must have the essential character of an outgoing incurred in gaining assessable income (Lunney v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1958) 100 CLR 478; (1958) 11 ATD 404; (1958) 7 ATR 166) and there must be a nexus between the outgoing and the assessable income so that the outgoing is incidental and relevant to the gaining of assessable income (Ronpibon Tin N.L.Tongkah Compound N.L. v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR 47; (1949) 8 ATD 431; (1949) 4 AITR 236).
As such, it is necessary to determine if there is a sufficient connection between the card payment fee and the earning of assessable income. This question will generally be answered by a careful analysis of the objective circumstances that gave rise to the liability being discharged by the use of the card.
In your case, you incurred the card payment fees by using your credit card to pay your PAYG instalments. A careful analysis of the character of the fee indicates that it is not an expense incurred in earning your assessable income. It is a fee incurred as a result of a payment made by you after you had earned your assessable income.
Therefore, the card payment fees are not deductible under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.
Managing tax affairs
Subsection 25-5(1) of the ITAA 1997 allows deductions for expenditure incurred by a taxpayer to the extent that it is for managing their tax affairs. Section 995-1 of the ITAA 1997 defines 'tax' to mean income tax assessed under either the ITAA 1997 or the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 and imposed by any other act.
The context and structure of section 25-5 of the ITAA 1997 makes it clear that 'tax affairs' is intended to have a wide operation. The section is wide enough to cover a card payment fee incurred as a direct consequence of paying an income tax liability.
However, paragraph 25-5(2)(c) of the ITAA 1997 expressly denies a deduction for 'expenditure for borrowing money', including payments of interest, in respect of money borrowed and spent on managing certain aspects of your tax affairs, including payments of tax or amounts withheld or payable under Part 2-5 or Part 2-10 in Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
If a taxpayer uses a credit card and that use results in the card issuer providing credit, then the taxpayer has borrowed money from the credit card provider (Taxation Ruling TR 2000/2 at paragraph 43).
Based on the facts in your case, the card payment fee is incurred by you as a necessary step in the process of borrowing money from the credit card provider. It is simply a cost of the borrowings.
Although you have incurred an outgoing to manage your tax affairs within the meaning of paragraph 25-5(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997, it is also 'expenditure for borrowing money' to pay for expenses incurred in managing your tax affairs as in paragraph 25-5(2)(c) of the ITAA 1997.
Therefore, the card payment fees are not deductible under section 25-5 of the ITAA 1997.
Borrowing expenses
Subsection 25-25(1) of the ITAA 1997 allows a deduction for expenditure you incur for 'borrowing money' to the extent that you use the money for the purpose of producing assessable income.
If a taxpayer uses a credit card and that use results in the card issuer providing credit, then the taxpayer has borrowed money from the credit card provider (Taxation Ruling TR 2000/2 at paragraph 43).
The proper characterisation of a card payment fee is a question of fact to be decided on a case by case basis by reference to the precise circumstances of each case.
Based on the facts in your case, the card payment fee incurred by you was a necessary step in the process of borrowing money from the credit card provider. It was an expenditure incurred in borrowing money to pay your PAYG instalments.
Therefore, a careful analysis of the character of the fee indicates that it was not an expense incurred in earning your assessable income. It was a payment out of income after it had been earned. It follows that the fee was not incurred for the purpose of producing your assessable income.
Therefore, the card payment fees are not deductible under section 25-25 of the ITAA 1997.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
