Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012340205212
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.
Ruling
Subject: Medical expenses tax offset
Question
Does the cost of a surrogate mother or birth of your child qualify as a medical expense for the purposes of calculating a medical expense tax offset?
Answer
No.
This ruling applies for the following period
Year ended 30 June 2012
The scheme commenced on
1 July 2011
Relevant facts
You have issues with fertility.
You selected a surrogate mother who lived overseas.
You incurred to bring the surrogate to Australia, accommodation and the surrogate's medical expenses.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 159P(1)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 159P(4)
Reasons for decision
A medical expenses tax offset is available under subsection 159P(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) where you pay medical expenses in an income year for yourself or a dependant who is an Australian resident, to the extent that you are not reimbursed, or are eligible to be reimbursed, from a government or public authority or a society, association or fund.
A 'dependant' is defined in subsection 159P(4) of the ITAA 1936 as:
· The spouse of the taxpayer; or
· A child of the taxpayer who is under 21 years of age; or
· A person for whom the taxpayer is entitled to a dependants rebate, or a child or student in respect of whom the taxpayer qualifies for a notional dependants rebate.
The definition of "medical expenses" in sub-section 159P(4) of the ITAA 1936 includes payments to a legally qualified medical practitioner or a public or private hospital in respect of an illness or an operation.
Taxation Ruling IT 2359 states that infertility is accepted as an illness within the ordinary meaning of the term. The expenses you incurred relate to another person who acts as a surrogate for your child.
While it is accepted that infertility is an illness, the expenses for the surrogate were not paid in respect of yourself or a dependant. They do not qualify as a medical expense. Therefore, you cannot include any of the costs involved in the surrogacy as part of a calculation for a medical expense tax offset.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).