Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012363470666

Ruling

Subject: Capital gains tax event and cost base

Issue 1

Question 1

Does CGT event A1 occur as a result of the on-sale of a CGT asset?

Answer

No

Question 2

If the answer to question 1 is no, does CGT event D1 occur as a result of the on-sale of the CGT asset?

Answer

Yes.

Question 3

If the answer to question 1 is no, can the Commissioner confirm that no net capital gain will arise in relation to the on-sale of the CGT asset?

Answer

Not applicable.

Issue 2

Question 1

Is the Entity A's cost base of the on-sale of the CGT asset the same as the acquisition price for the CGT asset provided to Entity B?

Answer

No.

Question 2

If not, what is the cost base of the on-sale of the CGT asset to Entity C?

Answer

The cost base of the CGT event D1 is the incidental costs of creating the contractual right.

Question 3

If the answer to question 1 is no, can the Commissioner confirm that no net capital gain will arise in relation to the on-sale of the CGT asset?

Answer

No, a net capital gain is made if, and to the extent, the proceeds received from creating the contractual right exceed the incidental costs of creating the contractual right.

This ruling applies for the following period:

Year ended 30 June 2012

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2011

Relevant facts and circumstances

The scheme the subject of this Ruling has been ascertained from the following documents:

Relevant legislative provisions

Section 104-10 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997

Section 110-25 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997

Division 112 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997

Subsection 112-30(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997

Division 116 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997

Reasons for decision

Issue 1

Question 1

Section 104-10 of ITAA 1997 provides:

SECTION 104-10  Disposal of a CGT asset: CGT event A1

 

104-10(1)

 

CGT event A1 happens if you *dispose of a *CGT asset.

104-10(2)

 

A CGT asset is defined in subsection 108-5(1) of ITAA 1997 as:

By contract, Entity A acquired the business of Entity B. The CGT asset which can be identified from the contract is the goodwill of the business.

Taxation Ruling TR 1999/16 Income tax: capital gains: goodwill of a business provides at paragraph 12:

The acquisition for Entity A was based on a valuation method customary in the industry of Entity B and which did not account for potential opportunities for an Entity C type business. Accordingly goodwill acquired by Entity A being that of the business of Entity B was that of such an Entity, i.e. a business which did not include that of one carried out by Entity C.

From the above we conclude that the CGT asset provided by Entity A to Entity C, a right, was not a CGT asset acquired from Entity B or a CGT asset that existed prior to being created by the contract between Entity A and Entity C.

Accordingly, CGT event A1 does not occur as a result of the contract between Entity A and Entity C as it is not a disposal of an existing CGT asset.

Question 2

Section 104-35 of ITAA 1997 provides:

The CGT asset disposed of by Entity A to Entity C was a right. This right was created by the contract between Entity A and Entity C.

In accordance with section 104-35 of ITAA 1997, the relevant CGT event is D1.

Question 3

Not applicable

Issue 2

Question 1

As previously provided in the answer to issue 1 question 1, it is considered that the CGT asset provided by Entity A to Entity C, the right, was not a CGT asset acquired from Entity B or a CGT asset that existed prior to being created by the contract between Entity A and Entity C.

Cost base

Pursuant to section 110-25 of ITAA 1997, the cost base of a CGT asset is made up of five elements:

However, we have established that the relevant CGT event is D1. Subsection 104-35(3) of ITAA 1997 restricts the cost base of a CGT event D1 to the incidental costs that relate to the event.

Subsection 104-35(3) of ITAA 1997, for the purposes of CGT event D1, states:

Section 110-35 of ITAA 1997 stipulates the incidental costs which may be included in the cost base.

Section 110-35 of ITAA 1997 provides that there are 10 incidental costs you may have incurred in acquiring the asset or for the CGT event that happens to it including its disposal and that they are:

Question 2

Subsection 104-35(3) of ITAA 1997 restricts the cost base of a CGT event D1 to the incidental costs that relate to the event.

Subsection 104-35(3) of ITAA 1997, for the purposes of CGT event D1, states:

Section 110-35 of ITAA 1997 stipulates the incidental costs which may be included in the cost base.

Section 110-35 of ITAA 1997 provides that there are 10 incidental costs you may have incurred in acquiring the asset or for the CGT event that happens to it including its disposal and that they are:

Pursuant to subsection 104-35(3) of the ITAA 1997, the cost base of the CGT event D1 is the incidental costs of creating the contractual right.

Question 3

Subsection 104-35(3) of ITAA 1997, for the purposes of CGT event D1, states:

Capital proceeds

For most CGT events your capital proceeds are amounts of money or the value of any property you receive or are entitled to receive.

In some cases, pursuant to Division 116 of the ITAA 1997, you are taken to have received the market value of the asset at the time of the CGT event where:

You are taken to be dealing at arm's length with someone if each party acts independently and neither party exercises influence or control over the other in connection with the transaction.

In the circumstances of this case, Entity A received or were entitled to receive $X from Entity C as provided in the contract between them. so clearly more than nothing was received in exchange for the CGT asset.

The Application provides that Entity A and Entity C were dealing with each other at arm's length, accordingly it is considered that the capital proceeds from the CGT event was $X.

Cost base

As provided in the answers to question 1 and 2 above:

No information has been provided as to the actual incidental costs incurred in creating the right.

Pursuant to subsection 104-35(3) of the ITAA 1997, a net capital gain is made if (and to the extent) the proceeds received from creating the contractual right exceed the incidental costs of creating the contractual right.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).