Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.

Ruling

Subject: Non-arm's length income

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Will income derived by the self managed superannuation fund (the Fund) indirectly through a unit trust (the Trust) being a dividend in a related private company (Private Company) be treated as non-arm's length income of the Fund for the purposes of section 295-550 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following period:

Year ending 30 June 2013

The scheme commenced on:

During the income year ending 30 June 2013

Relevant facts and circumstances

The Fund

The Fund is a complying single member self managed superannuation fund.

The Fund has a corporate trustee (the Trustee).

The only member of the Fund (the Member) is a director of the Trustee.

The Fund owns all the units in the Trust which were acquired over a period of time for less than $5.00 per Unit.

Later, the Trustee of the Trust redeemed a large number of units in consideration of the sum equal to the original purchase price of one unit.

The Trust

The trustee of the Trust is X.

The Member of the Fund is a director of X.

The units in the Trust comprise of Capital Units and Income Units.

Recently, the Trust's trust deed (the Deed) was amended to, among other things, remove any power or discretion on the part of the trustee to retain or capitalise distributable income of the Trust.

The Deed, as amended, relevantly provides that:

The question as to whether any amount is received on income or capital account or form part of the income or capital of the Trust Fund shall be determined by the Trustee at its absolute discretion.

Each Income Unit shall entitle the Income Unit Holder to a contingent entitlement in the Income of Trust Fund but subject to Parts 8 and 9 of the Deed shall not entitle the Income Unit Holder to any particular interest in the Trust Fund or any part thereof or the Income of the Trust Fund.

The holder of a Capital Unit shall not be entitled to a share in the Net Income of the Trust Fund except to the extent that the Trustee declares in terms of Part 8 of the Deed.

The Trustee may, after paying the whole or any part of any Net Capital Profit of the Trust Fund, credit any amount remaining (less any tax payable) to capital reserves.

The Trustee may create and issue different classes of Capital Units and may designate classes of Capital Units in such manner as it deems appropriate to identify such classes.

The Trustee may redeem Units at fair value for cash or other consideration.

In addition to powers conferred upon trustees by law, the Trustee has absolute discretion to deal with the Trust Fund and its assets and liabilities, and to act on behalf of the Trust in any manner upon such terms and conditions as the Trustee shall think fit.

The income of the Trust is to be appointed each year to the Fund.

The Private Company

The Private Company issued to the trustee of the Trust, a number of ordinary shares for a total sum equal to less than $5.00 per share.

The Private Company intends to declare/pay dividends to the trustee of the Trust in respect of the shares which, per share, is equal to more than 400 times the original purchase price of one ordinary share.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 272-5(1) in Schedule 2F

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 272-5(2) in Schedule 2F

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 272-5

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 295-545(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 295-550.

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 295-550(4)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 295-550(5)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 995-1(1)

Taxation Administration Act 1953 Division 359 of Schedule 1

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 Section 71A

Reasons for decision

Meaning of special income

In accordance with subsection 295-545(1) of the ITAA 1997, the income of a complying superannuation fund, complying approved deposit fund or pooled superannuation trust is split into a non-arm's length component and a low tax component.

Section 295-550 of the ITAA 1997 lists the amounts of ordinary income or statutory income that are non-arm's length income of entities listed above and, as far as relevant, states:

Thus, to determine whether an amount is non-arm's length income of the Fund, there are two issues to consider, namely:

Meaning of 'fixed entitlement'

In accordance with subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997, an entity has a fixed entitlement to a share of the income or capital of a company, partnership or trust if the entity has a fixed entitlement to that share within the meaning of Division 272 in Schedule 2F to the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936).

Subsection 272-5(1) in Schedule 2F of the ITAA 1936 states:

Meaning of 'vested and indefeasible'

The terms 'vested and indefeasible' are not defined in the ITAA 1997. Therefore, the meaning to be given to these terms must be determined according to the ordinary meaning of the words having regard to the context in which they appear.

In Dwight v. Commissioner of Taxation (Dwight) Justice Hill of the Federal Court made the following comments concerning the meaning of the terms 'vested and indefeasible':

An interest is said to be defeasible where it can be brought to an end and indefeasible where it can not. Thus, a beneficiary with an interest which is not contingent but which interest may be brought to an end by the exercise of a power of appointment, would be said to have a vested but defeasible interest: cf Queensland Trustees Ltd v Comr of Stamp Duties (1952) 88 CLR 54 at 63, and Re Kilpatrick's Policies Trusts [1966] Ch 730.

In Walsh Bay Developments Pty Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation, Justices Beaumont and Sackville of the Federal Court referred to the distinction between vested but defeasible interests and an indefeasible interest as stated in Cheshire's Modern Law of Real Property, where the author said:

The Explanatory Memorandum to the Taxation Laws Amendment (Trust Loss and Other Deductions) Act 1998, which accompanied the enactment of former section 272-5 of the ITAA 1936 states:

It is an essential element of subsection 272-5(1) in Schedule 2F to the ITAA 1936 that in order to have a fixed entitlement to a share of income or capital there must be a vested or indefeasible interest 'under a trust instrument'. In all cases, the determining factor in deciding if fixed entitlements exist will be the terms of the trust instrument under which the trust is constituted.

Therefore, the first step in determining whether a beneficiary has a vested and indefeasible interest in a share of the income or capital of a trust is to ascertain the terms of the trust upon which the relevant trust property is held. As the Full High Court stated in CPT Custodians Pty Ltd v. Commissioner of State Revenue (Vic); Commissioner of State Revenue (Vic) v. Karingal 2 Holdings Pty Ltd, in taking this step:

Determining whether a beneficiary has a 'vested and indefeasible' interest in a trust, requires an extensive review of the relevant trust instrument including individual clauses to determine, based on the principles established in the case law, the existence of defeasible powers. After considering the terms of the Deed, it is our view that the Fund does not hold a fixed entitlement to a share of income or capital of the Trust. This view is based on the following factors (defeasible powers):

Application of subsection 295-550(4) of the ITAA 1997

As the Fund will not derive income as a beneficiary of a trust holding a fixed entitlement to the income, it is not necessary to consider the application of subsection 295-550(4) of the ITAA 1997.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).