Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012416468089

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.

Ruling

Subject: Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT)

Employees required to change their usual place of residence in order to perform duties of employment.

Question 1

Will the requirements of paragraph 143A(c)(iii) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA) be satisfied in respect of the provision of transport interstate of an employee who has been promoted to an interstate position?

Answer

Yes

Question 2

Will the requirements of subparagraph 58B(1)(b)(iii) of the FBTAA be satisfied in respect of the removal and storage of the household effects of an employee who chooses to change his Home Base to another State on his acceptance of a promotion interstate?

Answer

Yes

Question 3

Will the requirements of paragraph 58C(1)(b) of the FBTAA be satisfied in respect of the sale of the ownership of residence "A" of an employee who chooses to change his Home Base from "A" to "B" on his acceptance of a promotion to a position in "B"?

Answer

Yes

Question 4

Will the requirements of paragraph 58C(3)(b) of the FBTAA be satisfied in respect the purchase of the ownership of a "B" residence by an employee who chooses to change his Home Base from "A" to "B" on his acceptance of a promotion to a position in "B"?

Answer

Yes

Question 5

Will the requirements of paragraph 61C(1)(b) of the FBTAA be satisfied in respect of temporary accommodation in "B" occupied by an employee who chooses to change his Home Base from "A" to "B" on his acceptance of a promotion to a position in "B"?

Answer

Yes

Question 6

Will the requirements of paragraph 61C(1)(b) of the FBTAA be satisfied in respect of temporary accommodation in "B" occupied by an employee who chooses to change his Home Base from "A" to "B" on his acceptance of a promotion to a position in "B"?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following period

1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013

The scheme commenced on

1 April 2012

Relevant facts

The employer has entered into an Enterprise Bargaining Agreement, which governs the terms of employment for the employer's employees.

Under the EBA:

The 'Home Base' is the base to which an employee is permanently assigned and will be nominated in writing by the employer. The Home base of certain employees is a principal factor in the EBA.

The Home Base is referenced in the EBA with regard to when travelling allowances are paid, when transport and other benefits are provided, the commencement of duties, the location of the employee for standby duties, the state based legislation impacting leave and other work entitlements and other various elements of the EBA.

An employee was recently successful in gaining promotion. The relevant promotion position has a Home Base in City B.

The employee's existing Home Base is in City A.

The location of the employee's place of residence or domicile is not specified or proclaimed by the employer, however, in most cases it can be expected that the employee will reside at or near the employee's Home Base.

The employee owns a home in City A which is the employee's usual place of residence.

The employee will be required to permanently change the employee's Home Base from City A to City B in order to take up the position on promotion.

The employee will sell the employee's home in City A on the employee's relocation to City B.

The employee will purchase the ownership of a home in City B as the employee's usual place of residence on the employee's relocation to City B.

The employee will occupy temporary accommodation in City A and also in City B sometime during the period of relocation from City A to City B.

The employer and the employee propose to enter into a salary sacrifice arrangement (SSA) whereby the employer will reimburse the costs incurred by the employee in respect of the following:

Any reimbursement to the employee made by the employer under the terms of the above SSA will meet the requirements of section 20 of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 in relation to expense payment benefits.

Relevant legislative provisions

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Section 20

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Section 58B

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subparagraph 58B(1)(a)(i)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subparagraph 58B(1)(b)(iii)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Section 58C

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Sub-subparagraph 58C(1)(a)(i)(A)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Paragraph 58C(1)(b)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subparagraph 58C(2)(a)(i)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 58C(3)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Sub-subparagraph 58C(3)(a)(i)(A)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Paragraph 58C(3)(b)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subparagraph 58C(3)(e)(i)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Section 58F

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Section 61C

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Sub-subparagraph 61C(1)(a)(i)(A)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Paragraph 61C(1)(b)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 136(1)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subparagraph 141(2)(a)(i)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Section 143A

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subparagraph 143A(a)(ii)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Paragraph 143A(c)(iii)

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Detailed reasoning

1. Section 143A of the FBTAA sets out what is meant by the term 'relocation transport' for the purposes of the exemption of various benefits in respect of 'relocation transport' afforded under section 58F of the FBTAA. Section 143A of the FBTAA states:

2. Neither of the terms 'required' or 'solely' are defined in the FBTAA so both those terms will take their natural meaning in the context in which they are used. The Macquarie Dictionary, Multimedia Version 5.0.0.0, 01/10/01, provides the following definitions:

3. Paragraph 143A(c)(iii) of the FBTAA examines (as relevant here) whether the necessity for the transport arises solely because the employee is required to change the employee's usual place of residence in order to perform employment duties.

4. It is considered that paragraph 143A(c)(iii) of the FBTAA does not require an examination of the degree of choice that the employee may have had in accepting to perform the relevant employment duties.

5. It is also considered that paragraph 143A(c)(iii) of the FBTAA, conversely, does not require an examination of the extent of any incentives that an employer may provide for the employee to accept to perform the relevant employment duties.

6. Therefore, it is further considered that paragraph 143A(c)(iii) of the FBTAA examines only whether the following conditions are satisfied:

7. 'Place of residence' is defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA as including a place where a person resides on a permanent or temporary basis (and whether or not on a shared basis).

8. There is no definition in the FBTAA of the expression 'usual place of residence', however, it considered that the expression should be taken as referring to the customary or habitual place of residence of the relevant individual. Accordingly, an individual can only have one usual place of residence at any given time. It is also considered that it is expected that, generally, an employee's usual place of residence will be near where that employee is permanently employed.

9. Albeit, paragraph 143A(c)(iii) of the FBTAA examines whether it is 'required' that the employee changes the employee's usual place of residence, it is considered that the term 'required' used in this context does not mean that the change of usual place of residence necessarily be one that is 'compulsory' but, rather, that the change be one that is 'necessary' in the given circumstances.

10. There may have been no absolute obligation for the employee, in this case, to change the employee's usual place of residence from City A to City B. Nonetheless, given that the employee's 'Home Base' on accepting the promotion is now in City B, it is accepted that the overriding practical considerations necessary to perform the new employment duties make it necessary for the employee to change the employee's usual place of residence.

11. This condition is satisfied.

12. In this case the relevant expense payment benefits arise under fulfilment of the terms of the relevant SSA between the employee and employer.

13. However, paragraph 143A(c)(iii) of the FBTAA does not examine the reasons why the benefit arising from the reimbursement of the relevant transport costs is being provided but rather why the underlying transport itself is required.

14. It has been determined above, at paragraph 10, that the employee needs to change the employee's usual place of residence in order to perform the employee's duties of employment from City B.

15. Therefore, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, it is accepted that the transport in this particular case is required solely because the employee needs to change the employee's usual place of residence in order to take up the position in City B.

16. This condition is satisfied.

Conclusion on whether the requirements of paragraph 143A(c)(iii) of the FBTAA are satisfied

17. All the necessary requirements of paragraph 143A(c)(iii) of the FBTAA are satisfied in this particular case.

Question 2

Detailed reasoning

1. Section 58B of the FBTAA exempts benefits in relation to the removal and storage of household effects as a result of relocation. Section 58B of the FBTAA states:

2. Therefore, subparagraph 58B(1)(b)(iii) of the FBTAA examines (as relevant here) whether the necessity for the removal or storage arises solely because the employee is required to relocate the employee's usual place of residence in order to perform employment duties.

3. It is considered that subparagraph 58B(1)(b)(iii) of the FBTAA does not require an examination of the degree of choice that the employee may have had in accepting to perform the relevant employment duties.

4. It is also considered that subparagraph 58B(1)(b)(iii) of the FBTAA, conversely, does not require an examination of the extent of any incentives that an employer may provide for the employee to accept to perform the relevant employment duties.

5. Therefore, it is further considered that subparagraph 58B(1)(b)(iii) of the FBTAA examines only whether the following conditions are satisfied:

6. For similar reasons as used above, at paragraph 10 of Question 1, it is concluded that overriding practical considerations makes it necessary for the employee to change the employee's usual place of residence from City A to City B.

7. This condition is satisfied.

8. In this case the relevant expense payment benefits will arise under fulfilment of the terms of the relevant SSA between the employee and employer.

9. However, subparagraph 58B(1)(b)(iii) of the FBTAA does not examine the reasons why the benefit arising from the reimbursement of the removal or storage costs is being provided but rather why the underlying removal or storage itself is required.

10. It has been determined above, at paragraph 6, that the employee needs to change the employee's usual place of residence in order to perform the employee's duties of employment from City B.

11. Therefore, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, it is accepted that the removal or storage in this particular case is required solely because the employee needs to change the employee's usual place of residence.

12. This condition is satisfied.

Conclusion on whether the requirements of subparagraph 58B(1)(b)(iii) of the FBTAA are satisfied

13. All the necessary requirements of subparagraph 58B(1)(b)(iii) of the FBTAA are satisfied in this particular case.

Question 3

Detailed reasoning

1. Section 58C of the FBTAA exempts certain expense payment benefits and residual benefits in relation to the sale or acquisition of a dwelling as a result of relocation. Subsection 58C(1) of the FBTAA states:

2. Subparagraph 141(2)(a)(i) of the FBTAA states that a 'prescribed interest' includes the circumstances where 'a person acquires, holds or held an estate in fee simple in land or a stratum unit or 2 or more persons acquire, hold or held such an estate in land or in a stratum unit as joint tenants or tenants in common'.

3. Therefore, paragraph 58C(1)(b) of the FBTAA examines (as relevant here) whether the necessity for the sale of the interest arises solely because the employee is required to relocate the employee's usual place of residence in order to perform employment duties.

4. It is considered that paragraph 58C(1)(b) of the FBTAA does not require an examination of the degree of choice that the employee may have had in accepting to perform the relevant employment duties.

5. It is also considered that paragraph 58C(1)(b) of the FBTAA, conversely, does not require an examination of the extent of any incentives that an employer may provide for the employee to accept to perform the relevant employment duties.

6. Therefore, it is further considered that paragraph 58C(1)(b) of the FBTAA examines only whether the following conditions are satisfied:

7. For similar reasons as used above, at paragraph 10 of Question 1, it is concluded that overriding practical considerations makes it necessary for the employee to change the employee's usual place of residence from City A to City B.

8. This condition is satisfied.

9. In this case the relevant expense payment benefits will arise under fulfilment of the terms of the relevant SSA between the employee and employer.

10. However, paragraph 58C(1)(b) of the FBTAA does not examine the reasons why the benefit arising from the reimbursement of relevant costs in respect of the sale of the interest is being provided but rather why the underlying sale of the interest itself is required.

11. It has been determined above, at paragraph 7, that the employee needs to change the employee's usual place of residence in order to perform the employee's duties of employment from City B.

12. Therefore, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, it is accepted that the sale of the interest in this particular case is required solely because the employee needs to change the employee's usual place of residence.

13. This condition is satisfied.

Conclusion on whether the requirements of paragraph 58C(1)(b) of the FBTAA are satisfied

14. All the necessary requirements of paragraph 58C(1)(b) of the FBTAA are satisfied in this particular case.

Question 4

Detailed reasoning

1. As stated above, at paragraph 1 of Question 3, section 58C of the FBTAA exempts certain expense payment benefits and residual benefits in relation to the sale or acquisition of a dwelling as a result of relocation. Subsection 58C(3) of the FBTAA states:

2. Therefore, paragraph 58C(3)(b) of the FBTAA examines (as relevant here) whether the necessity for the acquisition of the interest arises solely because the employee is required to relocate the employee's usual place of residence in order to perform employment duties.

3. It is considered that paragraph 58C(3)(b) of the FBTAA does not require an examination of the degree of choice that the employee may have had in accepting to perform the relevant employment duties.

4. It is also considered that paragraph 58C(3)(b) of the FBTAA, conversely, does not require an examination of the extent of any incentives that an employer may provide for the employee to accept to perform the relevant employment duties.

5. Therefore, it is further considered that paragraph 58C(3)(b) of the FBTAA examines only whether the following conditions are satisfied:

6. For similar reasons as used above, at paragraph 10 of Question 1, it is concluded that overriding practical considerations makes it necessary for the employee to change the employee's usual place of residence from City A to City B.

7. This condition is satisfied.

8. In this case the relevant expense payment benefits will arise under fulfilment of the terms of the relevant SSA between the employee and employer.

9. However, paragraph 58C(3)(b) of the FBTAA does not examine the reasons why the benefit arising from the reimbursement of the relevant costs in respect of the acquisition of the interest is being provided but rather why the underlying acquisition of the interest itself is required.

10. It has been determined above, at paragraph 6, that the employee needs to change the employee's usual place of residence in order to perform the employee's duties of employment from City B.

11. Therefore, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, it is accepted that the acquisition of the interest in this particular case is required solely because the employee needs to change the employee's usual place of residence.

12. This condition is satisfied.

Conclusion on whether the requirements of paragraph 58C(3)(b) of the FBTAA are satisfied

13. All the necessary requirements of paragraph 58C(3)(b) of the FBTAA are satisfied in this particular case.

Question 5

Detailed reasoning

1. Section 61C of the FBTAA provides for the reduction of the taxable values of various expense payment fringe benefits and residual fringe benefits in respect of temporary accommodation relating to relocation. Section 61C of the FBTAA states:

2. Therefore, paragraph 61C(1)(b) of the FBTAA examines (as relevant here) whether the necessity for the temporary accommodation arises solely because the employee is required to relocate the employee's usual place of residence in order to perform employment duties.

3. It is considered that paragraph 61C(1)(b) of the FBTAA does not require an examination of the degree of choice that the employee may have had in accepting to perform the relevant employment duties.

4. It is also considered that paragraph 61C(1)(b) of the FBTAA, conversely, does not require an examination of the extent of any incentives that an employer may provide for the employee to accept to perform the relevant employment duties.

5. Therefore, it is further considered that paragraph 61C(1)(b) of the FBTAA examines only whether the following conditions are satisfied:

6. For similar reasons as used above, at paragraph 10 of Question 1, it is concluded that overriding practical considerations makes it necessary for the employee to change the employee's usual place of residence from City A to City B.

7. This condition is satisfied.

8. In this case the relevant expense payment benefit will arise under fulfilment of the terms of the relevant SSA between the employee and employer.

9. However, paragraph 61C(1)(b) of the FBTAA does not examine the reasons why the reimbursement of the relevant temporary accommodation costs is being provided but rather why the underlying temporary accommodation is required.

10. It has been determined above, at paragraph 6, that the employee needs to change the employee's usual place of residence in order to perform the employee's duties of employment from City B.

11. Therefore, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, it is accepted that in this particular case the temporary accommodation is required solely because the employee needs to change the employee's usual place of residence from City A to City B.

12. This condition is satisfied.

Conclusion on whether the requirements of paragraph 61C(1)(b) of the FBTAA are satisfied

13. All the necessary requirements of paragraph 61C(1)(b) of the FBTAA are satisfied in respect of the temporary accommodation in City B.

Question 6

Detailed reasoning

1. As stated above, at paragraph 1 of Question 5, section 61C of the FBTAA provides for the reduction of the taxable values of various expense payment fringe benefits and residual fringe benefits in respect of temporary accommodation relating to relocation.

2. As also stated previously, at paragraph 2 of Question 5, paragraph 61C(1)(b) of the FBTAA examines (as relevant here) whether the necessity for the temporary accommodation arises solely because the employee is required to relocate the employee's usual place of residence in order to perform employment duties.

3. For similar reasons it was determined above at paragraph 13 of Question 4 that all the necessary requirements of paragraph 61C(1)(b) of the FBTAA are satisfied in respect of the temporary accommodation in City B, it is concluded that all the necessary requirements of paragraph 61C(1)(b) of the FBTAA are also satisfied in respect of the temporary accommodation in City A.

You cannot rely on the rulings in the Register of private binding rulings in your tax affairs. You can only rely on a private ruling that we have given to you or to someone acting on your behalf.

The Register of private binding rulings is a public record of private rulings issued by the ATO. The register is an historical record of rulings, and we do not update it to reflect changes in the law or our policies.

The rulings in the register have been edited and may not contain all the factual details relevant to each decision. Do not use the register to predict ATO policy or decisions.

Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).