| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012425636579
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.
Ruling
Subject: Work related expenses
Question
Are you entitled to a deduction for the expenses incurred to install security cameras?
Answer
No.
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ended 30 June 2012
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2011
Relevant facts and circumstances
You are an employee.
Your work vehicle was vandalised and robbed. All your tools and equipment including specific work related uniforms were taken.
Your vehicle was replaced but you were targeted again.
You installed security cameras at your house in an attempt to deter any thieves that may be targeting your equipment.
It is a condition of your employment that the vehicle is kept at your residence outside working hours.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1
Reasons for decision
Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature, or relate to the earning of exempt income.
Taxation Ruling TR 95/13 deals with the assessability of allowances and reimbursements received by police officers and deductions for work-related expenses generally claimed by police officers. Although you are not employed in this profession, the information contained in this ruling is relevant to your circumstances. In paragraph 116, the ruling states that a deduction is not allowable for the cost of installing a security system at a police officer's residence, as it is both a capital and a private expense.
In Frankcom v. FC of T 82 ATC 4599;(1982)13 ATR 636 a Magistrate claimed the cost of fitting security locks to windows and external lighting to the family home. These measures were in response to threats to burn down the family home and threats to his person. Kaye J of the Supreme Court of Victoria notes at 4607; 644 that the enduring benefit provided by these changes to the property rendered the additions capital in nature. However, he also noted that as they were for the protection of his home and family, the expenses were also of a private or domestic nature and thus were not allowable.
In Case T20 86 ATC 211; 29 CTBR (NS) Case 23, the Board noted that the expenditure on improved security measures (radio-controlled garage door, steel security screen doors and deadlocks) incurred by a Family Court judge was properly characterised as both capital and private in nature. While it was a 'once and for all' expense, its purpose was protecting the occupants of the premises - the judge's family. PM Roach (Member) also noted (at 213; 162) that the private character of the expense was retained even where part of the property was used for a substantial proportion of the income producing activities of the taxpayer.
In your case you have installed security cameras at your home. The installation of the security cameras is a 'once and for all' expense and, as such, it is considered to be capital in nature. While we acknowledge that the security cameras were installed in an attempt to protect your work vehicle, they also serve to protect your house, its occupants and its contents and consequently the expenses are also considered to be private or domestic in nature.
Therefore, the cost of installing security cameras at your home is not deductible under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
