Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012429074800
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.
Ruling
Subject: Net medical expenses tax offset - therapeutic treatment
Question
Do expenses incurred for therapeutic treatment qualify as eligible medical expenses for the purposes of the net medical expenses tax offset?
Answer
Yes
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ending 30 June 2013
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2012
Relevant facts and circumstances
Your child has been diagnosed as suffering from a disorder.
Your child's paediatrician has recommended that they would benefit significantly from an integrated program of therapeutic treatment. The program uses occupational therapists, speech therapists, early childhood teachers, psychologists and care workers to assist affected children to develop skills and improve behaviour.
Although the integrated program is subsidised by the Government you will incur extensive out of pocket expenses.
Your child was referred to the program by their paediatrician who also regularly monitors the outcomes of the program.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 159P
Reasons for decision
Subsection 159P(3A) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) provides that a rebate is allowable to a taxpayer whose net medical expenses in the year of income exceed the threshold.
The expenses must be paid by a resident taxpayer in respect of themselves or their resident dependant. The taxpayer's child is a resident dependant in accordance with subsection 159P(4) of the ITAA 1936.
Medical expenses are defined in subsection 159P(4) of the ITAA 1936.
Paragraph (d) of the definition includes payments 'for therapeutic treatment administered by direction of a legally qualified medical practitioner'.
In order to qualify for the rebate such payments must meet the following conditions;
· they are for therapeutic treatment; and
· the therapeutic treatment is administered by the direction of a legally qualified medical practitioner.
The general concept of therapeutic treatment is healing or curing rather than preventing the need for therapy (Case S2, 85 ATC 102; 17 TBRD Case S8 ).
In Case R95 84 ATC 633; Case 148 27 CTBR (NS) 1154, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal found that 'therapeutic treatment' necessitated the exercise of professional skill in the medical field. This would normally involve the person administering the treatment using chemical agents or drugs or some physical and mental processes which are directed towards the cure or management of a disease or ailment.
The Commissioner accepts that the integrated program therapy is therapeutic treatment for the purposes of subsection 159P(4) of the ITAA 1936.
The therapeutic treatment must be administered by direction of a legally qualified medical practitioner.
A mere suggestion or recommendation by a doctor to a patient that the patient undergo therapeutic treatment is not enough for the associated expenses to qualify as medical expenses. The patient must be referred to a particular person for the therapeutic treatment (Case A53 69 ATC 313).
In your case, your child was referred for the therapy program by a legally qualified medical practitioner who regularly monitors the outcomes of the program. Accordingly, the expenses you incurred which relate directly to the administering of this program are considered eligible medical expenses for the purposes of the net medical expense tax offset.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).