Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012436200898

Ruling

Subject: Am I in business trading land

Question 1:

Did your single purchase of vacant land (the property) constitute the carrying on of a business since the time of its purchase?

Answer 1:

No.

Question 2:

Was the property trading stock?

Answer 2:

No.

Question 3:

Is the loss from the property sale deductible?

Answer 3:

No.

Question 4:

Is the loss incurred on the disposal of the property a capital loss and subject to the CGT provisions?

Answer 4:

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following period:

Year ended 30 June 2012.

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2011.

Relevant facts and circumstances

You (a company) were established about seven years ago.

You usually trade shares on the Australian Stock Exchange and you carry on a business of share trading.

Sometime in the year 200X, you purchased a vacant block of land (the property) for a certain amount.

Some seven months later the property was placed on the market with an initial asking price of about $Y higher than the purchase price. Due to the market conditions at that time, you were not able to sell the property.

The property was sold sometime during the relevant year, for substantially less than its purchase price.

You have stated that it was your intention to commence carrying on a business of trading in land.

No company minutes were prepared by you in relation to the purchase or sale of the property.

The property was not included as part of the closing stock in the financial statements or income tax returns lodged by you for the years ended 30 June 200X to 30 June 200Z inclusive.

You have stated that the property was not included as closing stock in the relevant years because of a miscommunication between your sole director and your accountants.

The property was treated by you as a capital investment in the accounts and the interest costs were capitalized.

Your sole director has stated that they realised the error in the tax treatment of the property, only after the property was sold and instructed your current accountant to correct the error.

Your accountant has, on your behalf requested this private binding ruling to clarify the Australian Taxation Office view of the arrangement.

The following documents are to be read with and form part of the scheme for the purposes of the private binding ruling:

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 6-5,

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1,

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 70-10,

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-10 and

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 995-1.

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Summary

Your single purchase of vacant land (the property) does not constitute the carrying on of a business since sometime in 200X.

Detailed reasoning

You initially treated and then continued to treat the property as a capital asset from the time of its purchase until the time of its sale. There does not exist any company minutes regarding the purchase of the property. There was no written strategy or business plan in place regarding any proposal or intention by you to trade in land. All of the evidence supports the fact, that the property was held on capital account. You cannot re-characterise the property from that of a capital asset to trading stock after it is sold for two reasons;

Carrying on a business of trading in land

Section 995 of the ITAA 1997 states the term 'business' includes any profession, trade, employment, vocation or calling, but does not include occupation as an employee.

To determine whether an activity, or series of activities, amounts to a business, the activity needs to be considered against the indicators of a business established by case law.

In the High Court of Australia case of Hope v. Bathurst City Council (1980) 144 CLR 1; (1980) 29 ALR 577; (1980) 80 ATC 4386; [1980] HCA 16, a business was described in the following ways:

Taxation Ruling TR 97/11 discusses the main indicators of carrying on a business. Based on that discussion some indicators are:

In determining whether a taxpayer is carrying on a business, no one indicator will be decisive. The indicators must be considered in combination and as a whole. Whether a business is being carried on depends on the large or general impressions gained from looking at all the indicators and whether these indicators provide the operations with a commercial flavour.

Application to your circumstances

You initially treated and then continued to treat the property as a capital asset from the time of its purchase until the time of its sale. All of the evidence supports this fact, that the property was held on capital account. When considering the indicators of business listed above, your single purchase and sale of the property fails to meet the factors of business. One of the main reasons is the lack of trading in land, (transactions entered into on a continuous and repetitive basis).

Question 2

Summary

The property was not trading stock.

Detailed reasoning

Section 70-10 of the ITAA 1997 defines trading stock as anything produced, manufactured or acquired that is held for purposes of manufacture, sale or exchange in the ordinary course of business.

Land can only be treated as trading stock if a business of trading in land is actively being carried on. There must be present the continuity of activity which characterises a business.

Question 3 and Question 4

The loss from the property sale is not deductible because you are not in the business of trading land. The loss incurred on the disposal of the property is a capital loss and is subject to the CGT provisions.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).