Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012444218886

Ruling

Subject: Bad debt deduction

Question

Is Entity A, a beneficiary of the Trust, entitled to a deduction under section 25-35 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) for unpaid present entitlement amounts that have been written off as bad debts?

Answer

No

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ended 30 June 2012

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2011

Relevant facts

In prior years, Entity A was credited with income distributions from the Trust however the distributions were not paid.

These distributions remain unpaid in the relevant year at which time a formal demand was made for payment.

The Trust has no net assets and was unable to repay the amount owing.

Legal advice was obtained that any enforcement action would be unsuccessful.

Accordingly the amount owing was written off as irrecoverable in the relevant year.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 97

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Division 6 of Part III

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 25-35

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 25-35(1)(a)

Reasons for decision

A deduction for a bad debt may be claimed under section 25-35 of the ITAA 1997 if the requisite conditions are satisfied.

Paragraph 25-35(1)(a) provides that:

Taxation Ruling TR 2010/3 states in part:

When a beneficiary is presently entitled to an amount from a trust estate, it has an equitable right to that amount. That is, the beneficiary has rights in equity and not, without more, as a result of any debtor-creditor relationship

Whilst the rights arising from a present entitlement can, in some circumstances, become, or crystallise into an equitable debt (for example, upon calling for payment of that entitlement), the right that arises on the creation of a present entitlement is not a debt.

Moreover, the amount included in the taxpayer's assessable income is not the amount of the present entitlement. Rather it includes in its assessable income its proportionate share of the trust's 'net income' calculated by reference to the proportionate share of the income of the trust to which the taxpayer is presently entitled. That is, the amount assessed to the taxpayer may be a very different amount than the amount to which it was entitled to receive from the trust.

As Entity A has not brought a debt into account as assessable income and does not carry on a business of lending money, the bad debt cannot be claimed as a deduction under section 25-35 of the ITAA 1997.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).