| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012449267487
Ruling
Subject: Special disability trust
Question
Can the main residence exemption under Subdivision 118-B of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) be applied to any capital gain arising from the disposal of the property, thus allowing the capital gain to be disregarded?
Answer:
No
This ruling applies for the following period
Year ended 30 June 2012
The scheme commenced on
1 July 2011
Relevant facts
A property was transferred into the Trust and then later sold.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 118-218
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 118-110(1)(a)
Reasons for decision
Ordinarily a trust cannot apply the main residence exemption as paragraph 118-110(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 requires that the entity making the gain must be an individual. There are exceptions however.
Taxation Determination (TD) 58 states that where a beneficiary is absolutely entitled as against the trustee to the dwelling and it is the main residence of that beneficiary the main residence exemption would be available. This position stems from section 106-50 that states that any actions done by the trustee are considered to be done by the beneficiary when the beneficiary is absolutely entitled to the CGT asset in question.
The core principle underpinning the concept of absolute entitlement in the CGT provisions is the ability of a beneficiary, who has a vested and indefeasible interest in the entire trust asset, to call for the asset to be transferred to them or to be transferred at their direction. This derives from the rule in Saunders v. Vautier (1841) BEAV 115 applied in the context of the CGT provisions.
For the purposes of determining absolute entitlement any legal disability suffered by the beneficiary is ignored. In other words, if the only thing that prevents a beneficiary from being absolutely entitled under the rule in Saunders v. Vautier is their legal disability, then they will be absolutely entitled for the purposes of the CGT provisions.
The interest a beneficiary has in the trust asset must be vested in possession and indefeasible. A trustee would only be obliged to satisfy such a demand from a beneficiary with such an interest.
The beneficiary is not absolutely entitled.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
