Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012482280968

Ruling

Subject: Rebatable Employer

Question 1

For the years of tax ended 31 March 20XX to 31 March 20YY was the entity a rebatable employer for the purposes of subsection 65J(1) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA)?

Answer

No

This ruling applies for the following periods:

The scheme commences on:

1 April 200Z

Relevant facts and circumstances

The Entity is established under a State Act, which provides for the Entity's:

While the State Act allows the Entity to make it own rules the rules have no effect unless the Minister notifies them (the notice is subordinate legislation).

Relevant legislative provisions

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Section 65J

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Paragraph 65J(1)(j)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 65J(5)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 65J(2A)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 50-25

Australian Charities and Not-for profits Commission Act 2012

Legal Professional Act 2007

Financial Accountability Act 2009

Statutory Bodies Financial Arrangements Act 1982

Reasons for decision

Section 65J of the FBTAA provides a rebate for certain non-profit employers, known as 'rebatable employers'.

Subsection 65J(1) of the FBTAA states:

Therefore, in order to satisfy the requirements of subsection 65J(1) of the FBTAA, an employer must be neither a public benevolent institution nor a registered health promotion charity, and secondly, must be covered by at least one of the paragraphs within the subsection.

The ATO view of what is a public benevolent institution can be found in Taxation Ruling TR 2003/5 Income tax and fringe benefits tax: public benevolent institutions. Paragraph 7 of TR 2003/5 states:

The Entity has not been organised for the purposes outlined in paragraph 7 of TR 2003/5 and therefore is not a public benevolent institution.

A 'registered health promotion charity' is defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA as follows:

registered health promotion charity means an institution that is:

(a) a registered charity; and

The Entity does not meet the above requirements and so is not a registered health promotion charity.

As the Entity is neither a public benevolent institution nor a registered health promotion charity they will be a rebatable employer if they meet the requirements of any of the paragraphs contained in 65J(1) of the FBTAA.

The only paragraph within subsection 65J(1) of the FBTAA that the entity may be covered by is paragraph 65J(1)(j) which applies to a non-profit society, non-profit association, or non-profit club, established for community service purposes (not being political purposes or lobbying purposes). It is under this item that the Entity has asked to be considered.

Is the Entity a non-profit society, non-profit association, or non-profit club, established for community services purposes (not being political or lobbying purposes)?

1. Non-profit society, non-profit association, or non-profit club

Subsection 65J(5) of the FBTAA provides the meaning of 'non-profit society', 'non-profit association' and 'non-profit club' for the purposes of section 65J of the FBTAA. Subsection 65J(5) of the FBTAA states:

(a) the society, association or club is carried on otherwise than for the purposes of profit or gain to its individual members;

The society, association or club…

The terms society, association and club are not defined in the taxation legislation.

In Pro-Campo Ltd v Commisioner of Land Tax (NSW) (1981) 81 ATC 4270; 12 ATR 26 (Pro-Campo Case) Lee J discusses the meaning of the words 'society, association and club' stating:

And further that:

Accordingly ATO views applying to associations will also be considered in determining whether the Entity satisfies requirement of being an association or society. Taxation Determination TD 95/56 Fringe Benefits Tax: can a body which is formed by government, is controlled by government and performs functions on behalf of government be an 'association' for the purposes of section 65J of the Fringe Benefits Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA)? states in paragraphs 2 to 4 that:

The State act establishes the Entity and states that the Entity is a statutory body for the purpose of certain other Acts.

The State Act lists the functions and powers of the Entity. The State Act provides that the Entity may make rules but defines the parameters under which they may be made, stating that these rules will have no effect unless the Minister notifies the making of the rules (the notice is subordinate legislation).

The State Act also provides membership and council rules for the Entity.

Accordingly although the Minister is not involved in the day to day running of the Entity its functions, membership requirements, council and rules are ultimately controlled by government.

Further, similar to that stated in paragraph 3 of TD 95/96 the members of the Entity do not create the body (or have the power to dissolve it) as the State Act provides for the Entity to continue in existence and to run in perpetual succession.

As stated in TD 95/96 as body that is formed by government, performs functions on behalf of government and is ultimately controlled by government the Entity is not formed to effect the purposes of the members. Rather it is formed to effect the purposes of government and as stated in paragraph 3 of TD 95/96 such a body cannot be said to be an association.

Therefore the Entity, as a body that is not an association and therefore similarly not a society, fails the requirements of section 65J(5) and accordingly section 65J(1).

Conclusion

As a body that is not an association, society or club the Entity cannot meet the requirements of paragraph 65J(1)(j) and therefore fails the requirements to be a rebatable employer under subsection 65J(1) on this point. However for completeness sake the remaining requirements will also be considered.

…is carried on otherwise than for the purposes of profit or gain to its individual members;

The ATO publication Income tax guide for non-profit organisations (NAT 7967) states that:

Neither the Entity's constituting Act, or it's rules contain any clauses to prevent a distribution of profits to members. Any winding up clause is precluded by the State Act which states that the Entity has perpetual succession.

The Entity contend that although it has no non-profit clause it should be accepted as a non-profit society on the basis that its objectives are aimed at providing services to the community rather than generating a profit.

However FBTAA in section 136 Interpretation states:

And:

Therefore the Entity being a society established by a State Act as a body corporate must be prohibited by the terms of it constituent document from making any distribution, whether in money, property or otherwise, to its members in order to be accepted under tax law as 'non-profit company'.

As the State Act and the Entity's rules contain no such clauses the Entity does not satisfy the non-profit requirement.

Conclusion

The Entity does not satisfy the requirements of subsections 65J(5)(a) and therefore for the purposes of section 65J of the FBTAA is not a non-profit society, non-profit association or non-profit club.

Is the Entity established for community service purposes (not being political purposes or lobbying purposes)?

As an organisation that is established to perform the function of government the Entity cannot be found to be formed to effect the purposes of its members. The Entity contends that it's function is not dissimilar to that of an industry ombudsman and therefore a body established for community services purpose consistent with the ATO interpretative Decision ATO ID 2003/721 Income tax exemption: community services purpose - Industry Ombudsman.

However ATO ID 2003/721 provides an ATO view specifically for the scenario when an Industry Ombudsman entity is established by its members, pursuant to a requirement of a state/territory statute, to provide a free ombudsman service to all domestic and small business consumers of an industry. ATO ID 2003/721 outlines its interaction with TD 95/56 stating:

It is considered that the Entity is a body directly formed by government and controlled by government and therefore TD 95/56 is not precluded from applying.

As a society formed by government, controlled by government and performing functions of government the Entity cannot be appropriately characterised as a society established by its members for community service purposes.

Conclusion

The Entity cannot be appropriately characterised as a non-profit society, non-profit association, or a non profit club, established for community services purpose (not being political purposes or lobbying purposes) for the purposes of section 65(J) of the FBTAA as it:

Accordingly the Entity is found not to be a rebatable employer.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).