Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012488168183

Ruling

Subject: GST and sale of village operations

Questions

Answer

Relevant facts and circumstances

This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.

Entity X and Entity Y are registered for GST.

Entity X purchased land through a nominee company, located in Australia. The Land carried a current planning permit for use of the Land as a village ('Permit').

Entity X is the registered proprietor of the land and the beneficiary of the Permit for the village.

Entity X and Y entered into an agreement to construct and operate the village.

The village project was built in X stages. The first resident moved in on ddmmyyyy and by mmyyyy X units had been completed and leases on Y of them had settled.

On ddmmyyyy prior to the sale of the village, a title search revealed there were leases in place on X units. The first of these leases was entered into on the ddmmyyyy and the last lease was entered into in mmyyyy.

Retirement village operations

1 The Agreement

On ddmmyyyy entity Y entered into an agreement (the Agreement) with entity X to develop and operate a village on the Property.

Details of this agreement are as follows:

Retirement village documentation

Residents enter into contracts under four documents when they enter into the village. Entity Y entered into these agreements with the owner (entity X) and residents.

You supplied the following sample agreements:

Details of agreements numbered 1, 2 and 4 are set out below.

Residence Contract

The residence contract provides that it is between the resident, the owner, Entity X and Entity Y the scheme operator.

These three parties agree to the following conditions:

Lease/sub Lease agreement

The parties to the Agreement are:

Lessor Entity X

Scheme Operator (We, us, our) Entity Y

Resident (You, your)

Loan agreement

This agreement provides that:

Subsequent events

In mmyyyy Entity X entered into a Memorandum of understanding (MOU) with a company to acquire the retirement living business conducted by Entity X group including intellectual property, staff, management rights, development rights and leasehold interests over development properties for a total capital outlay of approximately $XXX million. This deal did not proceed.

On ddmmyyyy Receivers and Managers were appointed over entity X and Entity Y by the debenture holder (DB). These two entities with controllers appointed will be known as XRM and YRM when referring to the period that they had controllers appointed over them.

On ddmmyyy a Voluntary Administrator was appointed to protect the interests of the unsecured creditors of entity Y. The ATO registered the administrators account on the account of entity Y.

The minutes of a meeting by the controllers with investors was held on 30 June 20XX and recorded that:

A notice of a proposed creditors meeting to be held on ddmmyyyy set out that the purpose of the meeting was to resolve that

On ddmmyyyy an interim report was presented to creditors to enable them to make an informed decision at a meeting to be held no later than ddmmyyyy. No decisions were outlined in this letter in regard to the sale of the property.

A letter from the controlling mind behind entity Y and entity X was tendered at the meeting however it only discussed ways of getting more funding for the project to continue. That is the letter advised that they believed refinancing was the correct course of action.

On ddmmyyyy a signed authority for an appointment of a real estate agent was supplied.

On ddmmyyyy there was an amendment to the appointment of the Receivers and Managers and a new Receiver replaced one of the Receivers previously appointed.

On ddmmyyyy a terms sheet was entered into with Entity A whereby:

On ddmmyyyy, XRM entered into a contract with the Entity A to sell the Property for a GST inclusive price of $X. This sale occurred in conjunction with:

In your ruling application the following contentions and additional information was provided:

Relevant legislative provisions

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Division 9,

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Division 11,

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Division 129,

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Division 58 and

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Division 40.

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Will there be an adjustment pursuant to Division 129 of the GST Act as a result of marketing and selling the village operations?

Summary

An adjustment under Division 129 of the GST Act will not arise for you as the Receiver Manager because of paragraph 58-10(4)(c) of the GST Act. This paragraph provides broadly that an adjustment that relates to an acquisition where the incapacitated entity (IE), Entity Y provided the consideration for the supply before the representative (You) became a representative of the IE, will not be attributable to a tax period applying to the representative in the capacity of a representative of the IE.

In addition there will be no adjustment under the account of Entity Y pursuant to Division 129 of the GST Act, as the extent of the creditable purpose for the acquisitions made by Entity Y has not changed since it began operations to develop and operate the village. I.e the creditable purpose percentage for the intended or former application of the things was 100% and this percentage did not change at the date of sale of the village or any other time.

Detailed Reasoning

You are Joint and Several Receivers and Managers of Entity Y (YRM). You are representatives as defined in section 195-1 of the GST Act for Entity Y which is an incapacitated entity as defined in section 195 of the GST Act.

Division 129 of the GST Act sets out rules around how to calculate any adjustments as a result of changes in the extent of creditable purposes on acquisitions.

Division 129 will not apply to the accounts of YRM in your factual situation because of the effect of Division 58. Paragraph 58-10(4)(c) of the GST Act provides that an adjustment that relates to an acquisition where the incapacitated entity (IE) (Entity Y) provided the consideration for the supply before the representative (You) became a representative of the IE, would not be attributable to the tax periods applying to you as the representative of Entity Y.

Therefore we will consider the application of Division 129 to Entity Y.

Section 129-40 of the GST Act provides that the first step is to work out the extent (if any) to which an entity applies the thing acquired for a creditable purpose starting from when it acquired the thing up to the relevant adjustment period.

In Entity Y's case the acquisitions for the construction began in mmyyyy and construction of the village continued up to early yyyy.

During this period entity Y made acquisitions in relation to the construction of the village and associated facilities and also made acquisitions in relation to operating the village. The operating costs of the village will not be considered in this ruling because due to their quantum and complete application they would be excluded from Division 129 due to the operation of section 129-10(2) of the GST Act. Therefore we will confine our discussion to the effect Division 129 has on the acquisitions for the construction costs.

To what extent were your acquisitions applied to a creditable purpose?

Section 11-5 of the GST Act provides that you make a creditable acquisition if:

When Entity Y began the construction project it was registered for GST and where they paid consideration for any purchases that were taxable supplies to them, they would have been entitled to input tax credits subject to them being acquired for a creditable purpose.

An entity acquires purchases for a creditable purpose under section 11-15 of the GST Act where they were acquired in carrying on their enterprise and did not relate to supplies that would be input taxed or of a private or domestic nature.

Entity Y's supplies were not acquired for private or domestic purposes and therefore we will consider whether they were input taxed. Input taxed supplies are supplies where no GST is payable and there is no entitlement to input tax credits for anything acquired to make the supply.

Were any of Entity Y's supplies input taxed?

Section 40-35 of the GST Act provides that a supply of premises by way of lease hire or license is input taxed if the supply is of residential premises. The specialised units Entity Y constructed on the land meet the definition of residential premises as set out in the GST Act.

As the lessor of the unitss is entity X, it is entity X that is making input taxed supplies of residential premises.

Therefore we would conclude that Entity Y did not make any input taxed supplies of accommodation to the residents of the village.

Step 1: Work out the extent (if any) to which you have applied the thing for a creditable purpose during the relevant period.

As Entity Y meets all the requirements for creditable acquisitions it would have had a creditable percentage (%) of 100 in relation to the relevant costs associated with the supplies.

We note that when entity Y entered into the Agreement to develop and operate the village with entity X it supplied those services while registered for GST. Entity X agreed to assign the fees payable by the residents to Entity Y. As we have concluded that Entity Y's supplies are not input taxed, GST free or of a private or domestic nature its supplies which meet the definition of taxable supplies under section 9-5 of the GST Act will be taxable supplies.

This means that entity Y would be entitled to GST credits on construction costs and is liable to GST on its taxable supplies.

Step 2 requires you to review whether you have made a previous adjustment. In your case we understand that you have not made any adjustments.

Step 3 to 5 involves making a determination of whether you have any change in the extent of creditable purpose.

In your case as Entity Y made fully creditable acquisitions from the beginning of the construction up to and including the sale of the business there was no change in creditable purpose for the construction and operating costs so there will be no Division 129 adjustment.

Question 2

If so in what period will the adjustment be attributable?

As set out in the reasoning for question 1 neither you nor entity Y are entitled to make an adjustment under Division 129 as the creditable purpose pursuant to section 11-15 of the GST Act has not changed. Therefore the attributable adjustment period for the purposes of Division 129 does not need to be considered.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).