Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1012523292542

NOTICE

This edited version has been found to be misleading or incorrect. It does not represent the ATO's view of the relevant law.

This notice must not be taken to imply anything about:

Edited versions cannot be relied upon as precedent or used for determining how the ATO will apply the law in other cases.

Ruling

Subject: Non-commercial losses

Question

Is the receipt of a lump sum termination payment paid by the partnership to you upon retirement from the partnership, considered a receipt of capital which will be assessed under the capital gains tax (CGT) provisions of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Answer:

Yes

Question

Are the total of the capital proceeds for the surrender of your partnership interest attributable to CGT event C2 in the 20XX financial year?

Answer:

Yes

Question

Are you required to include any portion of the termination amount in your assessable income in the 20YY or 20ZZ financial year?

Answer:

No

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ended 30 June 2011

Year ended 30 June 2012

Year ended 30 June 2013

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2010

Relevant facts and circumstances

You were admitted as a partner in the19XX's.

You retired in the 20VV's

You received a payment as a result of your retirement from the partnership.

The partnership agreement also stipulated that, on retirement, you were subject to a number of restraints which will preclude you from providing services similar to those provided by the firm to clients or former clients (with some nominated exceptions) and also which restrict you from accepting employment with designated legal and accounting firms or beard or similar positions without prior approval.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 108-5(2)(d)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-25

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 104-25(3)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 104-25(2)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 108-5

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 108-5(1)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 108-5(1)(b)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 104-35(1)

Reasons for decision

Surrender of your partnership interest

The nature of a receipt, for the purposes of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997), is determined from the point of view of the recipient rather than that of the payer. Therefore, despite how your payment is described in the Partnership accounts or on your retirement statement, it is the nature of the receipt in your hands which determines how it is assessed.

The lump sum payment was not a distribution of the net income of the partnership, but a distribution of your share of the equity of the Partnership. Therefore, the receipt by you of the lump sum under the retirement agreement is not assessable as ordinary income and instead is considered a receipt of capital and will be assessable under the capital gains tax provisions.

Your retirement from the Partnership meant that you gave up your interest in the Partnership, and in any assets of the Partnership. Paragraph 108-5(2)(d) of the ITAA 1997 provides that a partner's interest in a partnership is a CGT asset. It is a chose in action.

Taxation Ruling IT 2540 examines the capital gains tax (CGT) implications of a disposal of a partnership interest. Though it is expressed in terms of the former CGT provisions (of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936) the discussion is still relevant for the purposes of the ITAA 1997. At paragraphs 13 and 14 it states:

Section 104-25 of the ITAA 1997 states that CGT event C2 happens if your ownership of an intangible CGT asset ends by the asset:

The time of the event is:

An interest in a partnership is considered an intangible asset.

The capital gain the taxpayer makes from CGT event C2 is equal to the difference between the proceeds received from the event happening and the cost base of the asset (subsection 104-25(3) of the ITAA 1997).

In your case, you did not pay anything on being admitted to the Partnership and there was no goodwill associated with the Partnership. Nonetheless, your interest in the Partnership was a CGT asset. As a result of leaving the Partnership your interest in the Partnership has ended.

CGT event C2 happened. The event happened when the agreement between the parties that resulted in the resignation was made (paragraph 104-25(2)(a) of the ITAA 1997). You made a capital gain equal to the difference between the payment you received from the Partnership and the cost base of your interest in the Partnership. Although you did not pay any consideration to acquire your interest, your cost base can include other costs you incurred to acquire the interest or costs that relate to the resignation occurring.

Restrictive covenant

The agreement entered into contains a restrictive covenant.

The Commissioner's definition of a restrictive covenant in subparagraph 6(a) of Taxation Ruling TR 95/3 is 'an agreement between two or more parties to refrain from doing some act or thing'. Examples of restrictive covenants are provided in paragraph 35 of TR 95/3 and include:

A right created under a restrictive covenant is a CGT asset. Such a right constitutes a CGT asset as defined in section 108-5 of the ITAA 1997, and is either a proprietary right (paragraph 108-5(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997) or a legal or equitable, non-proprietary right (paragraph 108-5(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997). The creation of such a right in favour of the partnership is a CGT event D1 under subsection 104-35(1) of the ITAA 1997.

In your case, the agreement contains restraint clauses. These clauses satisfy the definition of a restrictive covenant and CGT event D1 will happen at the time the contract is entered into.

However, as it is considered that you were dealing at arm's length in entering into the agreement and, no proceeds were specifically allocated to a restrictive covenant, we will treat the granting of the covenant as being ancillary to the surrender of your partnership interest.

We therefore accept that no part of the capital proceeds is attributable to the restrictive covenant CGT event D1. The total of the capital proceeds is for the surrender of your partnership interest and is attributable to CGT event C2.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).