Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012539553189

Ruling

Subject: Foreign income tax offset & flood levy

Question

Will the temporary flood and cyclone reconstruction levy (the flood levy) which is imposed under section 4-10 of the Income Tax (Transitional Provisions) Act 1997 (the ITTPA 1997) be reduced by the foreign income tax offset (FITO) which is available under subsection 770-10(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (the ITAA 1997)?

Answer

No. The flood levy will not be reduced by the FITO.

This ruling applies for the following period:

Year ended 30 June 2012

The scheme commences on:

The scheme commenced on 1 July 2011.

Relevant facts and circumstances

The taxpayer is a resident of Australia and is not a resident of a country with which Australia has a double tax treaty.

The taxpayer has derived foreign sourced income.

The taxpayer has paid income tax in Country X on that income.

That income was included in the taxpayer's assessable income for year ended 30 June 2012 (2012 year).

The taxpayer is liable to the flood levy and is not exempt from the flood levy.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, section 4-10

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, section 63-10

Income Tax (Transitional Provisions) Act 1997, section 4-10

Reasons for decision

Summary

The flood levy is not reduced by the FITO.

Detailed reasoning

The taxpayer was liable to pay the flood levy in the 2012 year. The taxpayer paid an amount of foreign income tax which was in excess of the basic income tax, the Medicare levy and the flood levy. The taxpayer was entitled to claim a FITO in relation to the foreign tax which was paid. The Commissioner issued an assessment for the 2012 year which allowed the FITO up to the amount of the basic income tax (excluding the flood levy) and the Medicare levy. The overall result was that the taxpayer was required to pay an amount equal to the flood levy whilst the part of the FITO which exceeded the basic income tax and the Medicare levy was wasted.

Subsection 4-10(3) of the ITAA 1997 sets out the manner in which tax is calculated:

The effect of Step 4 of the method statement in subsection 4-10(3) of the ITAA 1997 is that the FITO will reduce the basic income tax liability. However, as pointed out in Note 2, in the above quote, in addition to the basic income tax which is ordinarily calculated under subsection 4-10(3) of the ITAA 1997 you will have to pay the flood levy (if you are not exempt from the flood levy and you exceed the income thresholds).

Subsections 4-10(5), (6) and (7) of the ITTPA 1997 provide:

The Revised Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax Laws Amendment (Temporary Flood and Cyclone Reconstruction Levy) Bill 2011; Tax Laws Amendment (Temporary Flood and Cyclone Reconstruction Levy) Act 2011; Income Tax Rates Amendment (Temporary Flood and Cyclone Reconstruction Levy) Bill 2011; Income Tax Rates Amendment (Temporary Flood and Cyclone Reconstruction Levy) Act 2011 (the Explanatory Memorandum) explains:

The FITO is an income tax offset which is applied against a taxpayer's basic tax but is not refundable. For instance, item 22 of the table in subsection 63-10(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 provides:

Order of applying tax offsets

Item

Tax offset

What happens to any excess

22

*Tax offset for *foreign income tax under Division 770

...To the extent that an amount of it remains, you cannot get a refund of it, you cannot transfer it and you cannot carry it forward to a later income year

Section 4-10 of the ITTPA 1997 does not contain any provision that reduces the flood levy by the amount of the tax offsets (unlike step 4 of the method statement in subsection 4-10(3) of the ITAA 1997). The effect of section 4-10 of the ITTPA 1997 is that the flood levy is not reduced by tax offsets. The overall effect is that a tax offset which is not refundable, such as, the FITO, cannot reduce the amount of the flood levy.

Accordingly, the FITO will reduce the basic income tax and Medicare levy but the flood levy will continue to be payable and any excess FITO is wasted.

It is noted that there is no double tax treaty with Country X. Hence, it is not necessary to discuss whether foreign tax credits which are provided under various double tax treaties can be applied to reduce the flood levy: See, for example, Interpretative Decision ATO ID 2011/75.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).