Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012543839834
Ruling
Subject: GIC written off and re-raised
Question
Is the general interest charge (GIC) re-raised to your superannuation surcharge account deductible against your income for the year ended 30 June 2013?
Answer
No
This ruling applies for the following period:
Year ended 30 June 2013
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2012
Relevant facts and circumstances
At an earlier time, you were assessed to a superannuation surcharge amount, which remained unpaid and thus incurring GIC.
At a later time, the Commissioner wrote off the whole amount of your superannuation surcharge and related GIC debt.
However, at a later time, the Commissioner re-raised the total sum of your debt and also imposed an additional amount of GIC (which you have since been paid).
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 20-25
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 25-5
Reasons for decision
Deductibility of GIC
Paragraph 25-5(1)(c) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 provides a taxpayer can deduct expenditure incurred to the extent it is for the general interest charge (GIC) under Division 1 of Part IIA of the Taxation Administration Act 1953
Practice Statement Law Administration PS LA 2011/12, which explains the Commissioner's administration of the GIC, states, at paragraph 13, GIC is a tax deduction in the year that it is incurred.
In determining whether and when a loss or outgoing has been incurred, a key principle is it must be a presently existing liability to pay a pecuniary sum (Taxation Determination TD 2012/2).
In the recent Federal Court of Australia case of Commissioner of Taxation v Nash; [2013] FCA 336; 2013 ATC 20-384, it was confirmed that the earliest time the GIC liability crystallises into a presently existing liability is when all of the steps necessary for its imposition have occurred, namely, the making of an assessment by the Commissioner with the amount of tax payable. The Court decision, here, concerned GIC imposed as a result of unpaid income tax as a result of a late lodgement of an income tax return and does not apply to GIC accruing after the issue date of the assessment, which is deductible on a daily basis.
Recoupment of GIC
Subdivision 20-A of the ITAA 1997 is about assessable recoupments.
Subsection 20-25(1) of the ITAA 1997 states a recoupment of a loss or outgoing includes: (a) any kind of recoupment, reimbursement, refund, insurance, indemnity or recovery, however described; and (b) a grant in respect of the loss or outgoing.
Subsection 20-25(2A) of the ITAA 1997 states if: (a) you have incurred expenditure that consists of general interest charge or shortfall interest charge; and (b) the Commissioner remits any of that charge; then you are taken to receive the remitted amount as recoupment of that expenditure.
Application of law in your case
In your case, the writing off of your debt by Tax Office, on the grounds it was not economical to pursue, did not extinguish the deductibility of the GIC imposed prior to that date (in the prior income years it was imposed). This is because that amount of GIC remained a presently existing liability since recovery action could be taken at a later time.
Similarly, the writing off of your debt by Tax Office did not give rise to an assessable recoupment because (under subsection 20-25(1) of the ITAA 1997) you did not receive an amount as a recoupment of an outgoing and because (under subsection 20-25(2A) of the ITAA 1997) the Commissioner did not remit any of that charge.
In short, the decision to re-raise and pursue the unpaid debt was in respect of the original debt. It did not create a new debt and it did not trigger another right to claim a deduction in respect of the same GIC amount.
This outcome is confirmed in your superannuation surcharge account, which does not show a new imposition of GIC on the date your debt was re-raised. Instead, on that date, your account shows the re-raising of a generic debt and the imposition of an additional amount of (post-write off) GIC.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).