Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012547557991

Ruling

Subject: Deceased estate - Commissioner's discretion plus partial exemption

Questions and Answers:

1. Will the Commissioner exercise his discretion to extend the 2 year main residence exemption period under subsection 118-195(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) given the length of time that elapsed until an executor was appointed?

Yes.

2. As a result of the exercise of the above discretion, will all but X% of the capital gain (for which Beneficiary B and Beneficiary C are presently entitled) be exempt from capital gains tax (CGT)?

3. Does X% of the capital gain from the sale of the property (for which Beneficiary B and Beneficiary C are presently entitled) qualify for a partial exemption from CGT under sections 118-200 and 118-205 of the ITAA 1997?

4. Does the non-exempt capital gain to be calculated on the sale of the property have a cost base of X% of the market value of the property at 30 June 19YY and capital proceeds of X% of the sale price of the property (at 31 December 20YY)?

5. Are you, as trustee, liable for tax under section 99 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) on behalf of the estates?

6. Does section 128-20 of the ITAA 1997 apply and, therefore, are the legal owners of the property that are not exempt from CGT (namely, Beneficiary B and Beneficiary C) liable to pay their share of tax under section 97 of the ITAA 1936?

This ruling applies for the following period:

Year ended 30 June 2013

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2012

Relevant facts and circumstances

Prior to 20 September 1985, the three late tenants in common acquired the property in equal shares.

The property was used by the late co-owners as their principal place of residence until their deaths.

Each tenant in common died many years apart and intestate.

The property has never been income producing, including during the administration of the estates.

As state trustee, you were appointed tow years after the death of the last co-owner.

The primary beneficiary used the property as their main residence for 2 years after the death of the last co-owner and was under legal disability.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 118-195

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 118-200 

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 118-205 

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 128-15

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 97

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 98

Reasons for decision

Commissioner's discretion

Section 118-195 of the ITAA 1997 provides a capital gain or capital loss you make from a CGT event that happens in relation to a dwelling or your ownership interest in it is disregarded if:

Beneficiary or trustee of deceased estate acquiring interest

Column 1

Column 2

Column 3

Item

One of these items is satisfied

And also one of these items

1

the deceased acquired the ownership interest on or after 20 September 1985 and the dwelling was the deceased's main residence just before the deceased's death and was not then being used for the purpose of producing assessable income

your ownership interest ends within 2 years of the deceased's death, or within a longer period allowed by the Commissioner

2

the deceased acquired the ownership interest before 20 September 1985

the dwelling was, from the deceased's death until your ownership interest ends, the main residence of one or more of:

 

 

(a)

the spouse of the deceased immediately before the death (except a spouse who was living permanently separately and apart from the deceased); or

 

 

(b)

an individual who had a right to occupy the dwelling under the deceased's will; or

 

 

(c)

if the CGT event was brought about by the individual to whom the ownership interest passed as a beneficiary - that individual

The Explanatory Memorandum for the Tax Laws Amendment (2011 Measures No. 9) Act 2012 explains the Commissioner would be expected to exercise discretion (in sections 118-195 and 118-200) in situations such as where:

Application of Commissioner's discretion in your case

In your case, following the guidance in the Explanatory Memorandum, the Commissioner will exercise his discretion under section 185-195 of the ITAA 1997 on the grounds that, during the period of the estate's administration, the dwelling was not used to produce assessable income and the trustee and primary beneficiary did not hold their controlling and beneficial ownership interests in the dwelling for an excessive period of time.

Due to the intestacy of the deceased persons, you, the trustee, were belatedly appointed. However, you disposed of the property within 18 months of your appointment, which indicates the trustee promptly fulfilled their primary duty, namely, the disposal and distribution of estate assets.

Also, during the 3 year period from the date of death to the property's disposal, the primary beneficiary, used the property for 2 of those years as their main residence, which indicates the dwelling was not used for any purpose contrary to those listed in Column 3 of the table.

As for the other beneficiaries, despite the many years since they, by default, acquired their beneficial interests, they were unable to dispose of their (subsequent) minority ownership interests since they were not aware they held a beneficial interest until after the trustee was appointed.

Therefore the Commissioner will exercise his discretion under section 185-195 of the ITAA 1997 so it is applicable to all beneficiaries.

The exemption under section 118-195 will apply to all but X% of the capital gain (since no item in Column 2 is satisfied for X% of the capital gain).

No item in Column 2 is satisfied for X% of the capital gain because the deceased, a beneficiary of two original co-owners, acquired this portion interest after 20 September 1985 and the dwelling was not used as their main residence.

Partial exemption for deceased estate dwellings  

Where section 118-195 of the ITAA 1997 does not apply, section 118-200 of the ITAA 1997 may provide a partial exemption for deceased estate dwellings. You get only a partial exemption (or no exemption) if you are an individual and your ownership interest in a dwelling passed to you as a beneficiary in a deceased estate. You calculate your capital gain or capital loss using the formula:

Capital gain or capital loss amount x Non-main residence days
    Total days

However, you can adjust the formula by ignoring any non-main residence days and total days in the period from the deceased's death until your ownership interest ended, if:

You ignore any non-main residence days before the deceased's death if:

Section 118-205 of the ITAA 1997 provides you must adjust the formula in subsection 118-200(2) if the ownership interest of the deceased individual referred to in section 118-200 (the most recently deceased) passed to the individual on or after 20 September 1985 as a beneficiary in a deceased estate (in the following manner):

Below is an example of the operation of the total days adjustment in subsection 118-205(2):

Application of sections 118-200 and 205 in your case

In your case, sections 118-200 and 118-205 of the ITAA 1997 will not provide any partial exemption to X% of the capital gain earned from the sale of the dwelling, for Beneficiary B and Beneficiary C are the presently entitled beneficiaries.

The capital gain amount is multiplied by non-main residence days divided by total days which equals the capital gain multiplied by 1.

Applying subsection 118-200(3) does not provide a better result, since both the numerator and dominator in the formula are the same.

Section 118-205 does not change the formula since the amount that is "fewer" is the days where the dwelling was acquired by a non-beneficiary, which is nil.

Calculating the capital gain in the non-exempt amount

Item 3 of subsection 128-15(4) of the ITAA 1997 provides, if a dwelling that was the main residence of the deceased person just before they died and was not then being used for the purpose of producing assessable income, the beneficiary who acquires that asset is taken to have acquired it at market value on the day the deceased person died.

Item 1 of subsection 128-15(4) of the ITAA 1997 provides, if a deceased person acquired an asset on or after 20 September 1985, the beneficiary who inherits that asset is taken to have acquired it at the cost base of the asset on the day of the deceased person's death.

In your case, the X% non-exempt share of the property was acquired by the deceased, after 20 September 1985, on the death of the 2nd co-owner, for which the dwelling was the 2nd co-owner's main residence. Therefore, under Item 3 of subsection 128-15(4), the deceased acquired the property at its market value, which was their CGT cost base.

Item 1 and 3 of subsection 128-15(4) of the ITAA 1997 provides, since the deceased acquired the share of the property after 20 September 1985 and since the deceased did not use the property as their main residence, their beneficiaries, Beneficiary B and Beneficiary C, acquired their share of the property at the deceased's cost base.

Therefore, the capital gain on the disposal of X% of the property is calculated using the property's market value on the date when the 2nd owner died as its cost based and it final sale price as its capital proceeds.

Entity liable to tax

Section 97 of the ITAA 1936 provides a beneficiary who is not under a legal disability and who is presently entitled to a share of the income of a trust must include in their assessable income their share of the net income of the trust estate.

Section 98 of the ITAA 1936 provides where a beneficiary of a trust estate who is under a legal disability is presently entitled to a share of the income of the trust estate, the trustee of the trust estate shall be assessed and liable to pay tax on the beneficiaries behalf.

The net income of the trust eased estate (and whether any beneficiary is presently entitled) is determined on the last day of each income year. This means that, on the last day of the income year, a beneficiary who is presently entitled will be assessed on their share of the net income for the whole of the income year.

In your case, Z% of the capital gain from the sale of the property is CGT exempt. Therefore, neither the relevant presently entitled beneficiaries (who are not under legal disability) nor the trustee (on behalf of Beneficiary D, who is under legal disability) must include their share of 86% of the capital gain in their respective income tax returns.

As for the non-exempt X% portion of the capital gain, the presently entitled beneficiaries, who are not under legal disability, namely, Beneficiary B and Beneficiary C, are to include this gain in their individual income tax returns.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).