Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012552067264

Ruling

Subject: Capital gains tax and licence agreement

Question 1

Will the licence fees received under the licence agreement be considered 'royalties' and assessable under section 15-20 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Answer: No

Question 2

Will the licence fees received under the licence agreement be considered 'royalties' and assessable under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997?

Answer: No

Question 3

Will the licence fees received under the licence agreement be considered proceeds received from the outright sale of the registered trade marks (and associated property) owned by the trust and assessed under the capital gains tax (CGT) provisions of the ITAA 1997?

Answer: Yes

Question 4

Will entering into the licence agreement for the outright sale of the registered trade marks (and associated property) constitute CGT event B1?

Answer: Yes

This ruling applies for the following period(s)

Year ended 30 June 2014

The scheme commences on

1 July 2013

Relevant facts and circumstances

Company A as the trustee for Trust A (the trust) is the owner of the registered trademark (RT) and associated intellectual property (the property).

Mr A is a beneficiary of the trust, and a director and majority shareholder of Company A. Mr A formerly conducted a business of RT branded products.

In the 2013-14 financial year, the trust and Company Z entered into a licence agreement. The key terms of the licence agreement are as follows;

As a consequence of the licence agreement, Company Z now stocks and sells RT branded products in addition to the various other brands stocked by Company Z.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 6(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 15-20

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 6-5

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 995-1

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 108-5

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-15

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 102-25

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 118-25

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 70-10

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 118-24

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 40-30

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 118-20

Reasons for decision

Detailed reasoning

Royalties

Taxation Ruling IT 2660 discusses the definition of royalties. Paragraph 9 of IT 2660 states:

Paragraph 10 of IT 2660 provides that a common law royalty will normally have all of the following features:

Section 15-20 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) includes in assessable income an amount received by a taxpayer as or by way of royalty. However, a royalty is only assessable under this section if it:

Section 995-1 of the ITAA 1997 explains that a 'royalty' has the meaning given by subsection 6(1) Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936). Subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936 expands the meaning of a 'royalty' and states that a royalty, or royalties, includes any amount paid or credited, however described or computed, and whether the payment or credit is periodical or not, to the extent to which it is paid or credited, as the case may be, as consideration for (among other things) the use of, or the right to use, any copyright, patent, design or model, plan, secret formula or process, trademark, or other like property or right.

An amount that is a 'royalty' by reason only of the extended definition of that term in section 995-1 of the ITAA 1997 (a statutory royalty) is not included in assessable income under section 15-20 of the ITAA 1997. A statutory royalty that falls within the concept of ordinary income, however, is assessable under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997.

Taxation Ruling TR 2008/7 discusses royalties and the assignment of copyright. While the ruling focuses on the exploitation of copyright in the case of a tax treaty with a foreign country, it is considered that the ruling has relevance in this situation as the use of a copyright can be considered similar to the use of a trademark. Accordingly, the Commissioner's view on the use or outright sale of a copyright can be extended to include the use or outright sale of a trademark.

Paragraphs 13 and 14 of TR 2008/7 provide the following explanation:

Based on the information provided:

Accordingly, as all factors point to the assignment being comparable to an outright sale rather than merely a right to use the property, the fees received will not be royalties.

CGT assets

Subsection 108-5(1) of the ITAA 1997 states that a CGT asset is:

ATO Interpretative Decision ATOID 2002/958 discusses the definition of property and states:

A domain name is a unique name registered by a domain name registrar in the register of names in a domain, for example .com or .com.au, and listed or capable of being listed on domain name servers as being associated with a particular internet address. The registrant of a domain name holds a licence to use the domain name. The licence to use a domain name is a CGT asset as defined in sub-section 108-5(1) of the ITAA 1997.

Further, according to ATO Interpretative Decision ATO ID 2009/3, the rights in relation to trade marks, business names and domain names are CGT assets pursuant to paragraph 108-5(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997.

Accordingly, the property referred to as the 'licensor intellectual property' in the licence agreement, being the registered logo and trade/business name along with the domain names, are CGT assets.

CGT event B1

Section 104-15 of the ITAA 1997 explains that CGT event B1 happens if you enter into an agreement with another entity under which:

a) the right to the use and enjoyment of a CGT asset you own passes to the other entity; and

b) title in the asset will or may pass to the other entity at or before the end of the agreement.

The time of the event is when the other entity first obtains the use and enjoyment of the asset. You make a capital gain if the capital proceeds from the agreement are more than the asset's cost base. You make a capital loss if those capital proceeds are less than the asset's reduced cost base.

CGT event B1 effectively brings forward the time of a disposal (and the time of a capital gain or loss) under such an agreement from the time when the actual disposal takes place to the time when the use and enjoyment of the asset changes hands. In other words, the asset is treated as if it was disposed of when the use and enjoyment of the asset changes rather than waiting until the time when there is an actual disposal.

Even though CGT event B1 happens at the time the agreement commences, there is also an actual disposal when the title in the relevant asset passes at or before the end of the agreement. As a result of the actual disposal, CGT event A1 (section 104-10 of the ITAA 1997) happens.

Subsection 102-25(1) of the ITAA 1997 explains that if more than one event can apply to your situation, the one that you use is the one that is most specific to the situation. Clearly, where both CGT events A1 and B1 arise from this kind of agreement, CGT event B1 is the more specific. Accordingly, only the rules relevant to CGT event B1 are appropriate for working out any capital gain or loss that arises.

In your case, on entering into the licence agreement, the right to the use and enjoyment of a CGT asset you own, being the 'licensor intellectual property' referred to in the agreement, passes to Company Z. Then, on the expiry of the agreement, that is, when the full payment of the agreed amount is received, the title to the assets will pass to Company Z. Accordingly, CGT event B1 will happen.

Exclusions to the capital gains tax provisions applying

Trading Stock

Section 118-25 of the ITAA 1997 explains that a capital gain or capital loss you make from a CGT asset is disregarded if, at the time of the CGT event, the asset is:

Subsection 70-10(1) of the ITAA 1997 states that trading stock includes:

Accordingly, neither a trademark nor a domain name is considered to be trading stock.

Depreciating asset

Section 118-24 of the ITAA 1997 provides that a capital gain or capital loss you make from a CGT event (that is also a balancing adjustment event) that happens to a depreciating asset is disregarded if the asset was:

where the decline in value of the asset was worked out under Division 40 (including that Division as it applies under Division 355), or the deduction for the asset was calculated under Division 328, or would have been if the asset had been used.

Subsection 40-30(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides that a depreciating asset is an asset that has a limited effective life and can reasonably be expected to decline in value over the time it is used, except:

Subsection 40-30(2) of the ITAA 1997 states that these intangible assets are depreciating assets if they are not trading stock:

mining, quarrying or prospecting rights;

Section 995-1 of the ITAA 1997 states that an item of intellectual property consists of the rights (including equitable rights) that an entity has under a Commonwealth law as:

or of equivalent rights under a foreign law.

As the definition of intellectual property does not include a trade mark, it is excluded from being a depreciating asset by paragraph 40-30(1)(c) of the ITAA 1997 (ATO Interpretative Decision ATO ID 2004/858).

Similarly, as a domain name is not included in the definition of intellectual property, it too is not a depreciating asset.

Otherwise assessable

Section 118-20 of the ITAA 1997 states that a capital gain you make from a CGT event is reduced if, because of the event, a provision of this Act (outside of this Part) includes an amount (for any income year) in:

As already established, the licence fees to be received under the licence agreement, relate to the right to the use and enjoyment of a CGT asset you own passing to another entity until such time as the licence agreement expires which is when title in the asset will pass to the other entity (CGT event B1).

Since the licence fees to be received are not considered 'royalties' under the ordinary meaning of the term they are not assessable under section 15-20 of the ITAA 1997. Further, as the licence fees are also not considered 'royalties' by reason of the extended definition of that term they are not assessable under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997 as ordinary income.

Accordingly, as the licence fees received will not be included in your assessable or exempt income under any other provision, no reduction will need to be made to the capital gain you make from CGT event B1 and the capital gains tax provisions will continue to apply to the gain.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).