Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012554263104

Ruling

Subject: Income Tax - Double tax agreements

Question

Is the entity a 'financial institution' within the meaning of Article 11(3)(b) of the Convention between the Government of Australia and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital Gains [2003] ATS 22 (UK Convention)?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following periods:

For the period 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2014

For the period 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2015

For the period 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016

The scheme commences on:

During the period 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2014

Relevant facts and circumstances

The entity funds its balance sheet through diverse sources.

The entity has broken down its business activities into two categories: spread activities and non-spread activities.

The entity has stated that the spread activities it undertakes falls within the meaning of spread activities as outlined in paragraph 15 of Taxation Ruling 2005/5: Income tax: ascertaining the right to tax United States (US) and United Kingdom (UK) resident financial institutions under the US and the UK Taxation Conventions in respect of interest income arising in Australia (TR 2005/5).

The entity is a non-resident of Australia.

The entity does not have a permanent establishment in Australia under domestic law or the UK Convention.

Interest is derived by the entity from transactions that are entered into with unrelated parties, which are Australian resident borrowers. The entity deals with them independently on a commercial basis.

The entity is neither a 'corporate treasury' nor a member of a corporate group performing financial services for purposes of Article 11(3)(b) of the UK Convention.

The entity is not entering into back to back transactions or other arrangement that is economically equivalent and intended to have a similar effect to back-to-back loans under Article 11(4) of the UK Convention.

Relevant legislative provisions

Article 11(3)(b) of the Convention between the Government of Australia and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital Gains [2003] ATS 22

Reasons for decision

Article 11(3)(b) of the UK Convention provides:

Paragraph 15 of TR 2005/5 outlines when an entity that is not a bank will be considered a financial institution and what constitutes spread activities. Paragraph 15 of TR 2005/5 provides:

As the entity has stated that it undertakes spread activities it will be a 'financial institution' within the meaning of Article 11(3)(b) of the UK Convention if it substantially derives its profits from spread activities.

Substantially deriving its profits from spread activities

Paragraphs 26 and 27 of TR 2005/5 provide that:

It is apparent from the above that 'substantially deriving its profits' requires that the spread activities of the entity needs to be main contributor to the profit of the entity.

A comparison of the margin of the spread and the non-spread activities for the relevant periods to profits (loss) before tax indicates that the spread activities will continue to be the main contributor to the before tax profit or loss of the entity.

In view of the above, it is reasonable to conclude that the entity would satisfy the requirement that it substantially derives its profits from its spread activities for the period of the ruling. It would follow that the entity would be a 'financial institution' within the meaning of Article 11(3)(b) of the UK Convention over this period.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).