| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012561345113
Ruling
Subject: Deduction for travel expenses
Question
Are you entitled to a deduction for travel expenses incurred for travel between your home and your work place?
Answer
No.
This ruling applies for the following period
Year ended 30 June 2013
The scheme commenced on
1 July 2012
Relevant facts
You work as a music teacher and you teach a number of woodwind instruments. You take your instruments to and from work each day. You do not leave your instruments at work as you consider the storage arrangements unsatisfactory.
You regularly use your instruments after work for your own home practice and performance.
You also run another programme where you teach a variety of musical instruments. There are occasions when you borrow these instruments and take them home for practice.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1
Reasons for decision
Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature, or relate to the earning of exempt income.
Certain expenditure is incurred in order to be in a position to be able to derive assessable income, for example unless a person arrives at work it is not possible to derive income. This does not mean that the expenditure is incurred in the course of gaining or producing assessable income. Rather, the expenses are incurred to enable the taxpayer to commence income earning activities (Lunney & Hayley v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1958) 100 CLR 478; (1958) 11 ATD 404; (1958) 7 AITR 166 (Lunney's Case)).
A deduction is, generally, not allowable for the cost of travel by an employee between home and their normal workplace as it is considered to be a private expense. The cost of travel between home and work is generally incurred to put the employee in a position to perform duties, rather than in performance of those duties (see paragraph 77 of Taxation Ruling TR 95/34).
However, there are situations where it has been accepted that travel by employees from home to work is deductible. These situations include:
· where the employment can be construed as having commenced at the time of leaving home, for example a doctor on call,
· where you travel between home and shifting places of work, that is, an itinerant occupation, and
· the transportation of bulky equipment in some circumstances.
In your situation, your work has not commenced before leaving home and you are not considered itinerant. You do carry some work equipment while travelling; therefore the issue of bulky equipment is to be considered. The question of what constitutes bulky equipment is a question of fact and must be considered according to the individual circumstances of each case.
The question of what constitutes bulky equipment was considered in Case 43/94 94 ATC 387; AAT Case 9654 (1994) 29 ATR 1031. A flight sergeant with the Royal Australian Air Force was denied a deduction for the cost of transporting his flying suit and other items used for work purposes. The items were carried in:
· a duffle bag measuring 75cm long x 55cm wide x 50cm deep and weighing 20 kilograms when packed
· a suit bag which weighed 10 kilograms when packed, and
· a briefcase sized navigational bag which contained charts, work manuals and study materials.
It was held that the travel was private in nature and the items were not sufficiently bulky to impede easy transport. The mode of transporting the duffle bag, the navigational bag and the suit bag was simply a consequence of the means adopted in conveying himself to and from his place of employment.
In your situation, you take your musical instruments. We consider what you carry is not sufficiently cumbersome or heavy to be considered bulky. Based on the decision in Case 43/94 your equipment is not considered to be of a size or weight that would make their transportation difficult.
Therefore, your equipment is not considered to be of such bulk that it would change the primary purpose of your journey from one of transporting yourself to and from work to one of transporting the equipment.
Your travel expenses are of a private nature and are incurred as a necessary consequence of living in one place and working in another (Lunney's Case).
They are not incurred in gaining or producing your assessable income and are not deductible.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
