Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012563430662

Ruling

Subject: GST and cancellation of GST registration prior to making a supply of land

Question

If you deregister for GST prior to making the supply of the Property, will the supply of the Property be a taxable supply under the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999?

Answer

The Commissioner will not cancel your GST registration prior to you making the supply of the Property. Therefore, your supplies of the Property will be taxable supplies to the extent they satisfy section 9-5 of the GST Act, and are not input taxed.

Relevant facts and circumstances

You are a company incorporated in Australia that is registered for GST.

You own a large piece of land that comprises X lots and is located in Australia. Some of the lots are vacant land and a discrete portion of one of the lots contains a number of residential premises. The premises are separated by distances of between 30 and 80 metres. The residential premises occupy approximately one hectare of one of the lots

You are now considering selling the Lots to one or more eventual purchasers in their current state. The form of the sales may be as follows:

The above lots are the remaining land from a much larger piece of land that you purchased some time ago.

You purchased the land as a long term investment and to hold the land as an income earning real property investment which would be subject of a long term lease whereby the lessee also used the property for agistment. The land is in a rural area and had a number of residences and other buildings (modified to enable them to be lived in) and animal facilities.

You have consistently derived income from the lease of the land. Initially horses were agisted on the whole property and subsequently the land was simply used for residential purposes by the lessees. In the previous financial year you received income from renting the residential premises on the property of an amount less than $75,000.

During the period of time you have held these properties you have incurred a number of expenses. You have not claimed any GST on the expenses incurred for the rental of the residential premises. However you advised that you have believe you have mistakenly claimed expenses in relation to various costs including costs associated with the X sales of land or interests in the land in and the current sale process. You have undertaken to revise your BAS to exclude these claims if it is ruled that there is no development enterprise.

You advised that costs for the non rental portion of the property were:

You have dealt with your property a number of times since you acquired it in preparation for expected sales.

Relevant legislative provisions

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 9-5,

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 9-20,

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 23-5,

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 25-55,

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 188-10,

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 188-20 and

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 188-25.

Reasons for decision

Section 9-5 of the GST Act states:

Note: The terms marked with an asterisk are defined in section 195-1 of the GST Act.

Under paragraph 9-5(d) of the GST Act, one of the requirements for making a taxable supply is that the supplier is:

(i) registered for GST, or

(ii) required to be registered for GST.

You are currently registered for GST but have asked that if you were to deregister for GST prior to making the supply of the Property will you be making a taxable supply. Under the circumstances, we need to consider section 25-55 of the GST Act, which provides:

Section 23-5 of the GST Act states:

On the facts provided, you satisfy paragraph 23-5(a) of the GST Act as you are carrying on an enterprise that includes the leasing of property to tenants who reside in the residential premises.

Subsection 23-15(1) of the GST Act states:

The A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Regulations 1999 (GST Regulations) specifies that that for paragraph 23-15(1)(b) of the GST Act, the amount is $75 000.

Paragraph (a) of the definition of 'GST turnover' in section 195-1 states that in relation to meeting a turnover threshold - has the meaning given by subsection 188-10(1) of the GST Act, and the subsection states:

Under section 188-15 of the GST Act, generally:

Under section 188-20 of the GST Act, generally:

In your case, the income you have derived in the current month and the preceding 11 months has been income derived from:

Lease of residential premises and bank interest are generally input taxed supplies under Division 40 of the GST Act and therefore will be excluded in calculating your current and projected GST turnover. Accordingly, your current GST turnover may not meet the GST registration turnover threshold of $75,000.

Additionally, in calculating projected GST turnover, section 188-25 of the GST Act provides:

Of relevance for consideration in this case is paragraph 188-25(a) of the GST Act.

Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2001/7, Goods and services tax: meaning of GST turnover, including the effect of section 188-25 on projected GST turnover includes guidelines on the meaning capital assets. GSTR 2001/7 explains:

In your case, when you supply the Property you will be supplying:

(a) Residential premises

In considering the explanation in GSTR 2001/7, we consider the supply of the part of the lots that comprises residential premises will be the supply of a capital asset used in yielding the lease income. Accordingly, the supply will satisfy paragraph 188-25(a) of the GST Act, that is, the supply will be made by you by way of transfer of ownership of a capital asset of yours and disregarded in working out the projected GST turnover.

(b) Vacant land

When you supply the parts of the land that are vacant land, we need to consider whether the land is 'capital asset' or 'revenue asset' and therefore for the purposes of GST whether you were conducting an enterprise in regards to your activities on the land, outside of the leasing enterprise

Enterprise

The ATO view on the meaning of the term 'enterprise' is explained in detail in Miscellaneous Taxation Ruling MT 2006/1 The New Tax System: the meaning of entity carrying on an enterprise for the purposes of entitlement to an Australian Business Number (MT 2006/1).

Paragraph 234 of MT 2006/1 distinguishes between activities done in the form of a 'business' and those done in the form of 'an adventure or concern in the nature of trade'.

Paragraph 244 of MT 2006/1 explains that an adventure or concern in the nature of trade includes a commercial activity that does not amount to a business but which has the characteristics of a business deal. It refers to 'the badges of trade' and outlines a number of factors that may be taken into account when determining whether assets have the characteristics of 'trade' and held for income producing purposes, or held as an investment asset or for personal enjoyment.

Paragraphs 258 and 259 of MT 2006/1 provide guidance on the distinction between trading/revenue assets and investment/capital assets. They provide the following:

· Assets can be categorised as trading/revenue assets or capital/ investment assets. Assets purchased with the intention of holding them for a reasonable period of time, to be held as income producing assets or to be held for the pleasure or enjoyment of the person, are more likely not to be purchased for trading purposes.

· Examples of capital/investment assets are rental properties, business plant and machinery, the family home, family cars and other private assets. The mere disposal of capital/investment assets does not amount to trade.

The property in part was held as part of your leasing enterprise. We acknowledge that the property was held as a capital asset for the purposes of that leasing enterprise.

However, the relevant issue in your circumstances is whether you changed your intention in regards to portions of your property and conducted a development enterprise.

While an activity such as the selling of an asset may not of itself amount to an enterprise, account should be taken of the other activities leading up to the sale to determine if an enterprise is carried on.

Paragraph 264 of MT 2006/1 discusses two court cases [Statham & Anor v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (Statham) and Casimaty v. FC of T (Casimaty) involving subdivision and development of properties that were originally held as capital/investments assets, where the court decided that the sale of the post-subdivision lots was the mere realisation of capital/investment assets.

From these cases a list of factors can be ascertained that provide assistance in determining whether activities are a business or an adventure or concern in the nature of trade as opposed to the mere realisation of a capital asset.

Paragraphs 178 of MT 2006/1 set out the indicators of a business and paragraph 265 sets out relevant factors when examining isolated transactions

Indicators of carrying on a business.

No single factor will be determinative. Rather, it will be a combination of factors that will lead to a conclusion as to the character of the activities.

In applying the above factors to this case, we acknowledge that:

While the factors above in isolation would support the view that you are merely realising a capital asset when you sell the lots, we consider that the following factors lend support to the conclusion that your supplies are made in the course or furtherance of an enterprise of subdivision and sale:

On weighing up these factors there are for's and against's. However we note that:

In considering all the relevant facts surrounding your circumstances, we consider the purpose for which that portion of the land not used for the residential leasing activity has changed over time

On balance, we consider that over the period that the land was held by you, its character has changed from capital to revenue. Therefore, when you sell the remaining three lots we consider the part or parts of the land that are not residential premises will not be the sale of a capital asset. Accordingly, paragraph 188-25(a) of the GST Act will not apply and the supply (likely to exceed $75,000) will be included as your projected turnover.

Under the circumstances the Commissioner is not satisfied that you are not required to be registered for GST. Therefore, the Commissioner will not cancel your GST registration under subsection 25-55(1) of the GST Act if you apply to deregister prior to the supply of the relevant land.

This means your supply of the Property will be a taxable supply under the GST Act where all the requirements of section 9-5 are met, other than any parts of your supplies that will be input taxed.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).