Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012570874678

Ruling

Subject: non-commercial losses

Question 1

Are you carrying on a business?

Answer

No.

Question 2

Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to allow you to include any losses from your business activity in the calculation of your taxable income for the 2012-13 financial year?

Answer

No.

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ended 30 June 2013

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2012

Relevant facts and circumstances

This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.

The arrangement that is the subject of the private ruling is described below. This description is based on the following documents. These documents form part of and are to be read with this description. The relevant documents are:

Your income for non-commercial loss purposes was less than $250,000 in the 2012-13 financial year.

You commenced activities to develop a product in the 2012-13 financial year.

You incurred costs of less than $X per month during the 2012-13 financial year.

Due to the nature of your activities, you will not earn any assessable income until the product is complete.

You expect to begin earning income from our product in the 2013-14 financial year.

You anticipate you will pass the assessable income test and make a tax profit in the 2013-14 financial year.

You have started a company. The company has applied for a standard patent in relation to the product.

The company will sell the product.

You have previously worked in a related field.

You do not have a business plan, however you have stated that it is not common practice for this type of activity.

You do not have any other employment.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - paragraph 35-55(1)(b)

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Business losses from activities that do not meet any of the four tests under Division 35 of the ITAA 1997, or the exception in subsection 35-10(4) of the ITAA 1997, will be subject to the loss deferral rule in subsection 35-10(2) of the ITAA 1997, unless the Commissioner exercises a discretion under section 35-55 of the ITAA 1997 that it would be unreasonable to defer the loss.

In order for Division 35 to apply, a taxpayer must have commenced business. In determining when a business commences, there are three indicators that must be present before it can be said that a business has commenced. In order for Division 35 to apply, a taxpayer must have commenced business. In determining when a business commences, there are three indicators that must be present before it can be said that a business has commenced. These are:

We must examine the above indicators in light of the characterisation of your business activity. In Goodman Fielder Wattie Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation 29 FCR 376; (1991) 22 ATR 26; 91 ATC 4438, Hill J stated:

For example, for a primary production activity involving the planting and cultivating of trees, then the planting of the trees could be seen as the commencement of that business. Alternatively, if your business activity is characterised as a trading activity, involving conducting services in return for a fee, the business would generally be considered to have commenced once you begin conducting the services for a fee.

Computer software

Computer software, and licences to produce computer software, are trading stock for a person who trades in them (Taxation Ruling TR 93/12). Computer software which is produced or developed by a software manufacturer or developer for the purpose of sale is considered to be trading stock. Where the software is produced or developed for the purpose of granting licences rather than the sale of the software (the legal title remaining with the developer/supplier) and the taxpayer carries on a business of trading in software licences, the licences will be trading stock.

The information which you have provided indicates that your intention is to develop software and receive income in the form of sales of reports produced by the software.

Purpose, intention and decision

The chain of events leading to the commencement or start-up of a business activity often begins with a mere intention to establish the business activity.  This is developed by researching the proposed business and, in some instances, by experiment.  This process culminates in a final decision on whether to commence business.  However, not all businesses commence in such an orderly manner.

It is clear from the information you have provided that you had decided the form of that business and had shown some commitment to it by conducting market research and trials and investing time in developing the materials that will produce your product.

Acquisition of a business structure:

For a business activity to commence, an appropriate business structure should be in place. As to what this structure will consist of, and its size, this will be a question of fact and degree, and depend on the nature of the business activity. It is usually a collection of capital assets. What the particular capital assets are will depend on the particular business activity.

In Calkin v. CIR [1984] 1 NZLR 440 Richardson J said at 446-447:

In your case, you had not actually acquired all of the business assets that you needed to commence your business activity, including a finalised product to produce reports for sale.

Commencement of Business Operations:

As noted by Brennan J in Inglis v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1979) 10 ATR 493; 80 ATC 4001, the level of activity is important in deciding whether a business is being carried on.  Brennan J stated at ATC 4004-4005;  ATR 496-497 that:

In your case, you had not begun ordinary business operations during the 2012-13 financial year. At that point in time you did not have your software ready to produce a product for sale.

We consider that, up to this point, your activities were preliminary to the carrying on of your intended business. The costs associated with the establishment of a trading entity are capital in nature as they relate to the structure of the business rather than the daily activities from which the business gains its assessable income (see Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Maddalena 71 ATC 4161; (1971) 2 ATR 541.

Question 2

Non-commercial loss discretion

For the 2009-10 and later income years, Division 35 of the ITAA 1997 will apply to defer a non-commercial loss from a business activity unless:

In your situation, none of the exceptions would apply and you do not satisfy the income requirement. Your losses are therefore subject to the deferral rule, unless the Commissioner exercises his discretion.

The relevant discretion may be exercised for the income year in question where:

This discretion is intended to cover a business activity where there is an inherent period of time between the commencement of the activity and the production of assessable income. For example, an activity involving the planting of hardwood trees for harvest, where many years would pass before the activity could reasonably be expected to produce income.

For the discretion to be applied there needs to be an inherent or innate feature of the activity resulting in an inability to produce income in the year of commencement and (in most cases) a number of years thereafter. Further examples that fall into this category are forestry, viticulture and certain horticultural activities.

The discretion should not be exercised for any start-up activity that is yet, for example, to satisfy the assessable income test in section 35-30 of the ITAA 1997, simply because of the small scale on which it was started, or because a client base is being built up. The discretion should not be exercised for any start-up

As you are not considered to be carrying on a business the non-commercial loss provisions do not apply and the Commissioner is unable to exercise any discretion in this matter.

However, even if you had commenced business, you have not produced any objective evidence to show that there is an inherent or innate characteristic preventing the business from producing assessable income for any period of time (Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Eskandari [2004] FCA 8; 54 ATR 695).


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).