Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012579076345

Ruling

Subject: GST and the margin scheme

Question 1

Is A entitled to apply the margin scheme under Division 75 of the A New System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act) to calculate the goods and services tax (GST) liability payable on the sale of new residential premises constructed on A's land (the Lots).

Answer

Yes

Question 2

Can A use the purchase price paid or payable for the acquisition of the Lots as the consideration of the acquisition under subsection 75-10(2) and section 75-15 of the GST Act?

Answer

The consideration A actually paid (for Stage 1 Land) is used to calculate the margin for the whole land rather than the total consideration. However, a decreasing adjustment can arise for later payment of consideration (for Stage 2 Land).

Relevant facts and circumstances

· B was the owner of the land located in a State of Australia.

· A state Authority approved B to carry out certain works on the land and otherwise develop the Site.

· The State Approval required B to formalise development contributions with the local Council prior to the lodgement of any applications to carry out the Project on the Land. B entered into a Deed of Agreement with the local Council.

· Later B and A entered into a Deed for Redevelopment of the Site (the Deed).

· The Deed contemplates the development of the Site by A and B with A obtaining legal ownership and developing a number of Lots of the Site (the Lots") and B developing the rest of the Site ('B Lot').

· Key provisions of the Deed include the following:

STAGE 1 Acquisition

STAGE 2 Acquisitions

THE DEVELOPMENT OF STAGE 1

Assumptions

The supply of the land in both stages from B to A meets or will meet all of the requirements under Division 75 of the GST Act so that A can apply the margin scheme on subsequent supplies of the developed land.

Relevant legislative provisions

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999

Section 9-5

Section 9-15

Section 75-10

Section 75-12

Section 75-15

Section 75-27

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Summary

As the requirements under Division 75 of the GST Act are met,A can apply the margin on the subsequent supplies of the land.

Detailed reasoning

It is not disputed that A makes a taxable supply of new residential premises under section 9-5 of the GST Act. Generally, under Subdivision 9-C of the GST Act, the GST payable on a taxable supply is 1/11 of the price of the supply.

However, Division 75 of the GST Act allows an entity making a taxable supply of real property and the recipient of the taxable supply to use the margin scheme in working out the amount of GST payable on the supply.

Conditions for applying the margin scheme

To apply the margin scheme all of the following conditions must be satisfied:

· The supply (to A) is a taxable supply of freehold interest in land (paragraph 75-5(1)(a))

· The supplier and recipient have agreed in writing as required under subsections 75-5(1) and 75-5(1A) of the GST Act that the margin scheme is to apply.

· Subsections 75-5(2) and 75-5(3) of the GST Act do not operate to make the margin scheme ineligible.

A has advised that the subsequent supply of the properties will meet all of the requirements under the above provisions of the GST Act as:

Therefore, A can apply the margin scheme in calculating the GST payable on the supply of the new residential premises completed in Stage 1 and intended to be completed in Stage 2 of the development.

Question 2

Summary

A can only apply the consideration actually paid for the acquisition of the land (Stage 1 Land) not the full consideration for the acquisition. However, a decreasing adjustment can arise for later payment of consideration (for Stage 2 Land).

Detailed reasoning

The amount of GST payable under the margin scheme in provided under section 75-10 of the GST Act which states:

The margin for the supply is the amount by which the consideration for the supply (the sale of the new residential premises built on the land) exceeds the consideration for the acquisition of the land.

As the supply of the new residential premises relates only to part of the land that A acquired (the Lots), under section 75-15 of the GST Act, the consideration for A's acquisition of that part is the corresponding proportion of the consideration for the land that A acquired.

In summary, the margin of each supply of new residential premises is the difference between:

The following need to be considered to work out the apportioned consideration for the allotment:

The consideration for the acquisition of the land

Generally the consideration for the acquisition is the original purchase price for the land after taking into account adjustments on settlement that are commonly made for rates, land taxes and other outgoings.

The issue needs to be considered is whether the consideration for the acquisition is the consideration for the whole land or consideration for each stage land

As has provided that its intention is to acquire and develop the land as a whole:

However, A was unable to acquire all the Lots in one contract of sale due to:

The fact above indicates the intention of A to acquire the Lots as one acquisition and one purchase price for the acquisition.

However, under section 75-12 of the GST Act, where a supply of a freehold interest, stratum unit or long-term lease is made on or after 17 March 2005, the margin must be calculated by reference to the amount the acquisition consideration that has actually paid, rather than the total consideration.

Section 75-12 states:

A has provided that it has only actually paid the consideration for Stage 1 Land, the rest will be paid on the settlement of Stage 2 Land.

As only part of the total consideration has been paid (consideration for Stage 1 Land), section 75-12 of the GST Act applies.

Therefore, the consideration for the Lots to be apportioned for the total of xxx strata units and yyy freehold new residential premises is the consideration that A actually paid for Stage 1 Land.

Please note that when A makes payment of an additional payment for the Stage 2 Land, the consideration for the land will be the total amount paid for the Lots.

The corresponding consideration for each allotment can be revised to reflect the full sale price paid for the Lots. Under section 75-27 of the GST Act, A will be entitled to a decreasing adjustment for the allotments already sold using the partly paid consideration basis for the apportionment. The amount of the adjustment is 1/11 of the reduced margin which is based on the full consideration basis for the apportionment.

The apportionment methods

Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2006/8 explains how the margin scheme under Division 75 of the GST Act applies to a supply of a freehold interest, stratum unit, or long-term lease an entity. Paragraph 58 of GSTR 2006/8 provides:

Paragraph 59 of GSTR 2006/9 provides a number of apportionment methods that A can use. They include the 'anticipated selling price' where the consideration for the real property is apportioned on the basis of the proportion of the total anticipated selling price of the development represented by the particular allotment.

Paragraph 60 of GSTR 2006/8 further provides that the methods in paragraph may be used provided they give a fair and reasonable result. Use of lots or sites as an apportionment method would not give a fair and reasonable result if the size or value of the allotments or sites varies significantly.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).