Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012580609832

Ruling

Subject: Fringe Benefits Tax: benefits provided to volunteers

Question 1

Will fringe benefit arise from the provision of a car to a Controller to travel between their home and the Branch if the Controller is not separately paid and is not entitled to apply the car to any other private use?

Answer:

No.

Question 2

Will fringe benefit arise from the provision of a car to an Controller to travel between their home and the Branch if the Controller is not separately paid, but is entitled to use the car for certain private journeys such as travelling to the shops?

Answer:

No.

Question 3

Will fringe benefit arise from the provision of a car to an Controller to travel between their home and the Branch if the Controller receives a minimal annual payment, but is not entitled to apply the car to any other private use?

Answer:

No.

Question 4

Will fringe benefit arise from the provision of a car to an Controller to travel between their home and the Branch if the Controller receives a minimal annual payment and is entitled to use the car for certain private journeys such as travelling to the shops?

Answer:

No.

Question 5

Are you required to issue a payment summary in relation to the minimal annual payment made to the Individuals?

Answer:

No.

This ruling applies for the following periods:

1 April 2013 to 31 March 2016

The scheme commences on:

1 April 2013

Relevant facts and circumstances

This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.

You are an association that provides assistance to people in need.

You are comprised of multiple branches of volunteer members.

This ruling concerns the provision of the use of a car to an Individual who is a branch Controller.

The Controllers are on call 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.

In the event of a call out, volunteer members will generally travel from home to their Branch to pick up a vehicle prior to responding.

To assist with operational expediency, some Controllers are provided with a car which they can drive between their home and their Branch, to attend training and other active service requirements. Garaging the car at home enables the Controller to proceed directly to provide assistance, rather than having to drive to the Branch to pick up the car.

Generally, these cars cannot be used for other private journeys. However, some Controllers are able to use the cars for certain private purposes (for example, trips to the shops, or dropping children off at school while travelling between their home and their Branch). However, any such private journeys can only occur within the relevant local area.

In addition to the use of a car, a Controller may receive a minimal annual payment. This amount is based on the findings of a Working Group which was formed to investigate the out of pocket expenses incurred by the Controllers.

Controllers do not receive employment rights and entitlements such as paid leave or superannuation. However, they are covered by an appropriate level of volunteer insurance.

Relevant legislative provisions

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 136(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 995-1

Taxation Administration Act 1953 Division 12 of Schedule 1

Taxation Administration Act 1953 Section 16-155 of Schedule 1

Reasons for decision

Will fringe benefit arise from the provision of a car to a Controller?

In general terms a fringe benefit will arise when:

In the situation being considered the Controllers are able to garage a car which you hold at their residence. In addition, they may also use the car for a private purpose. Under subsection 7(1) of both the application and availability of a car for a private use are benefits. Therefore, the provision of a car to a Controller will be a benefit. The issue to be considered is whether a Controller is an employee?

Is a Controller an employee?

An 'employee' is defined at subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA to mean a current, future or former employee.

A 'current employee' is defined at subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA to mean 'a person who receives, or is entitled to receive, salary or wages'.

'Salary or wages' is defined at subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA to mean a payment from which an amount must be withheld under one of the listed provisions in Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (TAA).

The Controllers can be classified into the following four categories:

Will the Controllers who only receive the use of a car be an employee?

As the Controllers in the first two categories only receive the use of a car, they do not receive and are not entitled to receive 'salary or wages'. Therefore, they do not come within the definition of 'current employee'.

However, section 137 of the FBTAA extends the meaning of salary or wages to create an employment relationship for the purposes of the FBTAA where a benefit is provided that would have been classified as salary or wages if it had been a cash payment. That is, had the benefit been provided by way of a cash payment, the payment would be a payment from which an amount must be withheld under one of the provisions of the TAA listed in the definition of salary or wages?

Subsection 137(1) states:

In considering whether the relevant withholding provisions would apply if the use of the car had been provided as a cash payment it is necessary to consider whether the Controllers are volunteers or employees? Guidance for considering this question is provided in the ATO publication, Volunteers and tax, as follows:

Volunteers and tax also provides guidance in distinguishing volunteers from employees:

Further guidance is provided in Miscellaneous Taxation Ruling MT 2032 Fringe benefits tax: sporting clubs (MT 2032). In discussing whether a benefit provided to a player will be a fringe benefit paragraph 3 of MT 2032 states:

In discussing when players will be considered to be employees of the club paragraph 4 notes there is a range of situations. The situations at both ends of the range are discussed in paragraphs 4 and 6 of MT 2032. Paragraph 4 of MT 2032 states:

By contrast, paragraph 6 of MT 2032 states:

In providing a guideline as to the approach to be adopted where the situation is between these two situations paragraph 8 of MT 2032 states:

In applying these guidelines, a Controller who only receives the use of a car to travel between home and the Branch will clearly not be regarded as being an employee as the use of the car is merely offsetting travel expenses that would otherwise be incurred in carrying out the duties as a controller.

The inclusion of certain private journeys, such as journeys to the shops or taking children to school on the way between home and the Branch will not alter this conclusion as:

Will the conclusion alter if the Controller receives a minimal annual payment?

Where the Controller receives a minimal annual payment, the Controller will be an employee if a withholding obligation exists in relation to the payment under one of the provisions of the TAA listed in the definition of salary or wages in section 136(1) of the FBTAA.

For the purposes of this Ruling, the relevant provision is section 12-35 of Schedule 1 to the TAA as the payment will not be:

Section 12-35 of Schedule 1 to the TAA states:

The factors that are considered in determining whether the payments are made to a Controller as an employee are the same as those discussed above in relation to the application of section 137 of the FBTAA. In considering those factors in relation to section 137, we concluded that the provision of the use of a car to undertake certain private journeys was not sufficient to make the Controller an employee.

In considering whether the conclusion changes if the Controller also receives a minimal annual payment it is noted that this payment may result in the amount received ($xxx plus the value associated with the private use of the car) exceeding the Controller's anticipated expenses. While this factor may indicate the person is an employee, rather than a volunteer, this factor by itself is not sufficient to conclude that the Controller is an employee. In this regard it is noted:

These factors support the Controllers being classified as volunteers, rather than employees.

Therefore, the payment will not be subject to the withholding provisions and it will not be necessary to issue a payment summary in relation to the payment.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).