Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012585278779

Ruling

Subject: Capital Raising

Question 1

Will the Instrument be characterised as a 'non-share equity interest' for the purposes of the debt/equity rules in Division 974 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Answer

Yes.

Question 2

Will distributions payable in respect of the Instrument constitute frankable distributions under section 202-40 of the ITAA 1997 and not be unfrankable under section 202-45 of the ITAA 1997?

Answer

Yes.

Question 3

Will section 204-30 of the ITAA 1997 apply to the scheme?

Answer

No.

Question 4

Will section 177EA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) apply to the scheme?

Answer

No.

Relevant facts and circumstances

The transaction concerns the issuance of an Instrument by an Entity. The Instrument is convertible to ordinary shares in the Entity. Conversion will only happen if certain conditions are satisfied. The Instrument may also be redeemed or resold at face value in certain circumstances. Distributions on the Instrument are payable subject to certain conditions being satisfied. Distributions on the Instrument will be franked. Distributions payable in respect of the Instrument will not be debited to the Entity's share capital account or non-share capital account. The Instrument is being issued by the Entity to satisfy its financing requirements.

Relevant Provisions

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Summary

The Instrument will be characterised as 'non-share equity interest' for the purposes of the debt/equity rules in Division 974 of the ITAA 1997.

Detailed reasoning

Subsection 974-70(1) of the ITAA 1997 states that a scheme gives rise to an equity interest in a company if, when it comes into existence, it satisfies the equity test in subsection 974-75(1) of the ITAA 1997 and is not characterised as, and does not form part of a larger interest that is characterised as a debt interest under Subdivision 974-B of the ITAA 1997.

Paragraph 974-70(1)(a): The scheme must satisfy the equity test in subsection 974-75(1) in relation to the Entity

The equity test in subsection 974-75(1) of the ITAA 1997 is as follows:

Furthermore, subsection 974-75(2) of the ITAA 1997 provides:

Scheme

A 'scheme' is defined in subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997 as any arrangement, or any scheme, plan, proposal, action, course of action or conduct, whether unilateral or otherwise. The issue of the Instrument by the Entity constitutes a scheme.

The scheme gives rise to an interest set out in subsection 974-75(1) of the ITAA 1997

An equity interest in a company arises if an interest issued by the company will, or may, convert into an equity interest in the company or a connected entity of the company (item 4(b) of the table in subsection 974-75(1) of the ITAA 1997). The expression 'interest that will or may convert into another interest' has the meaning given in section 974-165 of the ITAA 1997:

The terms of the issue of the Instrument (Terms) provide for the conversion of the Instrument into ordinary shares in the Entity in certain circumstances. The conversion mechanism set out in the Terms is within the meaning of section 974-165 of the ITAA 1997. Furthermore, the ordinary shares issued on the conversion of the Instrument are equity interests in the Entity (item 1 of the table in subsection 974-75(1) of the ITAA 1997). Accordingly, the Instrument constitutes an interest that may convert into equity interests in the Entity and the scheme gives rise to an interest covered in item 4(b) of the table in subsection 974-75(1) of the ITAA 1997.

The scheme must be a financing arrangement

As the Entity enters into the scheme to raise finance for itself, the scheme is a financing arrangement within the meaning of paragraph 974-130(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997.

Therefore, the scheme satisfies paragraph 974-70(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997.

Paragraph 974-70(1)(b): The Instrument must not be characterised as debt interests in the Entity or a connected entity of the Entity under Subdivision 974-B of the ITAA 1997

Subsection 974-15(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides that:

Subsection 974-20(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides that:

(a) The scheme is a financing arrangement for the entity

As stated above, the scheme is a financing arrangement.

(b) The entity, or connected entity of the entity, receives or will receive a financial benefit or benefits under the scheme

Paragraph 974-160(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 states that a financial benefit includes 'anything of economic value'. Subsection 974-20(4) of the ITAA 1997 provides that a financial benefit received under the scheme is taken into account only if it is one that the other entity has an effectively non-contingent obligation to provide.

An 'effectively non-contingent obligation' is defined in subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997 to have the meaning given by section 974-135 of the ITAA 1997. Subsection 974-135(1) of the ITAA 1997 states that there is an effectively non-contingent obligation to take action under a scheme if, having regard to the pricing, terms and conditions of the scheme, there is in substance or effect a non-contingent obligation to take that action. Subsection 974-135(3) of the ITAA 1997 further provides inter alia that an effectively non-contingent obligation is an obligation that is not contingent on any event, condition or situation other than the ability or willingness of that entity or a connected entity of the entity to meet the obligation.

The Terms state that the Entity will receive a financial benefit under the scheme, namely the issue price that the holders have an effectively non-contingent obligation to provide. Accordingly, this requirement of the debt test is satisfied.

(c) The entity has, or the entity and a connected entity of the entity each has, an effectively non-contingent obligation under the scheme to provide a financial benefit or benefits to one or more entities.

Whilst a financial benefit includes anything of economic value, subsection 974-30(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides that the issue of an equity interest in the entity or a connected entity of the entity or an amount that is to be applied in respect of the issue of an equity interest in the entity or a connected entity of the entity does not constitute the provision of a financial benefit. Thus, the financial benefits to be provided by the Entity pursuant to the conversion mechanism in the Terms will not constitute the provision of a financial benefit by the Entity.

Consequently, in determining whether the Entity has an effectively non-contingent obligation under the scheme to provide a financial benefit, the relevant items of economic value (and therefore financial benefits), pursuant to section 974-135 of the ITAA 1997 are the obligations on the Entity to pay distributions on the Instrument and return any amount of the face value of the Instrument.

Obligation to pay distributions on the Instrument

The Entity does not have an effectively non-contingent obligation to provide a financial benefit by way of the distributions as payment of distributions is contingent on certain conditions being satisfied.

Obligation to return any amount of the face value of the Instrument

Redemption

The Terms set out the circumstances under which the Instrument may be redeemed. The circumstances in which redemption of the Instrument may occur do not suggest that the Entity has an effectively non-contingent obligation to provide a financial benefit. The occurrence of redemption is contingent on certain events occurring. The Entity does not have an effectively non-contingent obligation to provide a financial benefit in the form of the repayment of the face value of the Instrument on redemption.

Resale

The resale mechanism provided for in the Terms does not impose an effectively non-contingent obligation on the Entity to provide a financial benefit by way of returning the face value on the resale of the Instrument.

The above analysis demonstrates that the Entity does not have an effectively non-contingent obligation to provide a financial benefit by way of a distribution or return any part of the face value of the Instrument. The Entity therefore does not have an effectively non-contingent obligation to provide any financial benefit under the scheme. As the requirements of paragraph 974-20(1)(c) of the ITAA 1997 are not satisfied, the issue of the Instrument will not give rise to a debt interest in the Entity.

Conclusion

As the issuance of the Instrument satisfies the equity test in subsection 974-75(1) of the ITAA 1997 and does not meet the requirements to be characterised as a debt interest under Subdivision 974-B, it is treated as an equity interest in the Entity under Division 974 of the ITAA 1997. Each Instrument will constitute a 'non-share equity interest' as defined in subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997 as it is an equity interest in the Entity that is not solely a share.

Question 2

Summary

The distributions payable in respect of the Instrument will constitute frankable distributions under section 202-40 of the ITAA 1997 and not be unfrankable under section 202-45 of the ITAA 1997.

Detailed reasoning

Subdivision 202-C of the ITAA 1997 details the circumstances in which a distribution can be franked. Section 202-40 of the ITAA 1997 provides that distributions are frankable unless it is specified that they are unfrankable. Section 202-40 of the ITAA 1997 states:

As stated in the detailed reasoning for Question 1 above, each Instrument issued by the Entity is a non-share equity interest as defined in subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997. Distributions paid by the Entity in respect of each Instrument therefore constitute a 'non-share distribution' under section 974-115 of the ITAA 1997.

Section 974-120 of the ITAA 1997 provides that all non-share distributions will be non-share dividends, except to the extent to which the company debits the distribution against the company's non-share capital account or the company's share capital account. Distributions payable in respect of the Instrument will not be debited to the Entity's share capital account or its non-share capital account. Accordingly, the Distributions on the Instrument will constitute non-share dividends under section 974-120 of the ITAA 1997 and will be a frankable distribution to the extent that it is not unfrankable under section 202-45.

Section 202-45 of the ITAA 1997 sets out the circumstances under which an amount or distribution is taken to be unfrankable. Based on the facts and assumptions provided by the Applicant, it is considered that none of those circumstances will apply to the distributions made by the Entity on the Instrument.

Conclusion

Accordingly, the distributions payable in respect of the Instrument constitute frankable distributions under section 202-40 of the ITAA 1997 and are not unfrankable under section 202-45.

Question 3

Summary

Section 204-30 of the ITAA 1997 will not apply to the scheme.

Detailed reasoning

Section 204-30 of the ITAA 1997 is a general anti-streaming measure that applies if an entity streams distributions (or distributions and other benefits) in such a way that:

Where these conditions are met, subsection 204-30(1) of the ITAA 1997 empowers the Commissioner to make one or more of the following determinations listed in subsection 204-30(3) of the ITAA 1997:

Imputation benefit is defined in subsection 204-30(6) of the ITAA 1997 to include an entitlement to a tax offset under Division 207 of the ITAA 1997 as a result of the distribution. It is reasonable to expect that holders of the Instrument will receive an imputation benefit because the distributions payable in respect of the Instrument are frankable distributions.

The remaining issue is whether there will be a streaming of distributions in the way described in section 204-30 of the ITAA 1997. The expression 'streams' is not defined in the ITAA 1997. However, the Explanatory Memorandum (EM) to the New Business Tax System (Imputation) Bill 2002 (Cth), which introduced subdivision 204-D of the ITAA 1997 states at paragraphs 3.28 to 3.29 that:

Based on the information provided by the Applicant, it is considered that section 204-30 of the ITAA 1997 will not apply to the scheme.

Question 4

Summary

Section 177EA of the ITAA 1936 will not apply to the scheme.

Detailed reasoning

Section 177EA of the ITAA 1936 is a general anti-avoidance provision that applies where one of the purposes (other than an incidental purpose) of a scheme is to enable a relevant taxpayer to obtain an imputation benefit. Where this purpose exists, subsection 177EA(5) of the ITAA 1936 empowers the Commissioner to make a determination that either:

Pursuant to subsection 177EA(3) of the ITAA 1936, the provision applies if the following conditions are satisfied:

The conditions in paragraphs 177EA(3)(a) to (d) of the ITAA 1936 are satisfied because:

Accordingly, the issue is whether, having regard to the relevant circumstances of the scheme, it would be concluded that the person, or one of the persons, who entered into or carried out the scheme or any part of the scheme did so for a purpose (whether or not the dominant purpose but not including an incidental purpose) of enabling the relevant taxpayer (i.e. the holder of the Instrument) to obtain an imputation benefit (paragraph 177EA(3)(e) of the ITAA 1936).

This is a test of objective purpose. Circumstances which are relevant in determining whether any person has the requisite purpose include, but are not limited to, the factors listed in subsection 177EA(17) of the ITAA 1936. The relevant circumstances listed encompass a range of circumstances which taken individually or collectively could indicate the requisite purpose. Due to the diverse nature of these circumstances, some may or may not be present at any one time in any one scheme.

Having regard to the factors listed in subsection 177EA(17) and the relevant circumstances of the arrangement, the Commissioner is of the opinion that the purpose of the scheme is to meet the Entity's financing requirements. Any imputation benefits obtained by the holders of the Instrument are considered incidental to this purpose.

Conclusion

Accordingly, section 177EA of the ITAA 1936 will not apply.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).