| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1012610431339
The rulings in the register have been edited and may not contain all the factual details relevant to each decision. Do not use the register to predict ATO policy or decisions.
Ruling
Subject: Capital gains tax
Question 1
Are the land and improvements considered separate assets for capital gains tax (CGT) purposes?
Answer
No.
Question 2
Will a CGT event occur as a result of forfeiting the initial deposit?
Answer
Yes.
Question 3
Did a CGT event occur in the 2013-14 financial year when the property was demolished?
Answer
Yes.
This ruling applies for the following period
Year ending 30 June 2013
Year ending 30 June 2014
The scheme commences on
1 July 2012
Relevant facts and circumstances
You and your spouse purchased a property after 20 September 1985.
The property was leased for a period then rented privately over the holiday period.
At all other times the house has been used exclusively as a family weekender.
You and your spouse paid a non-refundable initial deposit with a view to rebuilding the holiday home.
Some weeks later a decision was made not to proceed and the initial deposit was forfeited.
Your spouse gifted you their share of the property.
The house, including fittings and fixtures, was demolished in the 2013-14 financial year.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 104-55
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 108-55
Reasons for decision
Question 1
A building or structure on land that you acquired on or after 20 September 1985 is taken to be a separate CGT asset from the land if one of the balancing adjustment provisions applies.
The common law principle is that anything attached to land becomes part of the land. However, the exception to this principle is set out in section 108-55 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997). Broadly, a building will be treated as a separate asset from the land to which it is affixed if the building is a depreciating asset for which a balancing adjustment must be worked out on sale, or the building is a post CGT asset and the land to which it is attached is a pre CGT asset (acquired before 20 September 1985).
In this case, the property is not covered by the balancing adjustments provisions, nor was the land acquire pre CGT, therefore the building will not be treated as a separate asset.
Question 2
Forfeited deposit
You can only make a capital gain or loss when a CGT event happens to a CGT asset you own.
Taxation Ruling TR 1999/19 deals with the treatment of forfeited deposits. When an individual signs a contract to purchase property, they acquire a CGT asset in the form of a contractual right to a transfer of the property (the contractual right).
When a contract for the sale of real estate is not proceeded with and a deposit is forfeited by a defaulting purchaser, Taxation Ruling TR 1999/19 specifies that either CGT event C1 or C2 happens to the contractual right acquired by the defaulting purchaser when the contract was entered into.
CGT event C2 happens when your ownership of an intangible CGT asset (such as contractual rights) ends. The time of the event is when you enter into a contract that results in the asset ending or, if there is no contract, when the asset ends. There are a number of ways such an asset can end, including being abandoned, surrendered or forfeited.
If the circumstances are voluntary, then it is considered there is a surrender, abandonment or forfeiture of the contractual rights and CGT event C2 is the more specific CGT event.
In this case, you paid a deposit with a view to rebuild the holiday home. A few weeks later you decided not to proceed and you forfeited the deposit. The decision to withdraw from the contract was a voluntary one. Accordingly, we consider that the most appropriate CGT event that can be applied to your circumstances is CGT event C2.
Question 3
Demolition
CGT event C1 happens if a CGT asset you own is lost or destroyed. As discussed in question 1, the dwelling was not a separate CGT asset because none of the balancing adjustment provisions in subsection 108-55(1) of the ITAA 1997 applied to it. However, the note to subsection 104-20(1) of the ITAA 1997 makes it clear that CGT event C1 can apply to part of a CGT asset.
Taxation Determination TD 1999/79 confirms that CGT event C1 can happen on the voluntary destruction of an asset where for example, a taxpayer might demolish a building in the course of redeveloping a property. Therefore, when the dwelling was demolished, CGT event C1 occurred.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
