Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private advice

Authorisation Number: 1012619212776

Ruling

Subject: Exemption from income tax

Question 1

Is the X Association (XA) exempt from income tax under section 50-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) as an association established for the purpose of promoting the development of a manufacturing resource of Australia under item 8.2(d) of section 50-40 of the ITAA 1997?

Answer

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ended 30 June 2013

Year ended 30 June 2014

Year ended 30 June 2015

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2012

Relevant facts and circumstances

The entity is a not for profit company limited by guarantee. The entity is a peak industry body.

XA has applied for a private ruling on the basis that they are an association established for the promotion of the development of Australian manufacturing resources pursuant to section 50-40 of the ITAA 1997.

The entity has provided their Constitution. Their Constitution has appropriate non-profit and dissolution clauses for a non profit entity.

The primary objects of its Constitution provide that the entity is established to promote their industry and further the standards, reputation and ethics of their industry.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 50-1

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 50-40

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Under section 50-1 of Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) the ordinary and statutory income of entities covered by the tables in sections 50-5 to 50-45 is exempt from income tax. The appropriate section for consideration in this ruling is item 8.2(d) of the table in section 50-40 of the ITAA 1997.

Item 8.2 of the table in section 50-40 of the ITAA 1997 states the following as being an exempt entity:

The special condition of the section is that the society or association is not carried on for the profit or gain of its individual members.

The entity has applied for consideration as a society or association established for the purpose of promoting the development of Australian manufacturing resources pursuant to item 8.2(d) of the table in section 50-40 of the ITAA 1997.

The conditions of section 50-40 of the ITAA 1997 are discussed below:

1. It must be a society or association.

The term society, association or club is not defined in the ITAA 1997. The term is therefore construed according to the ordinary meaning of the words.

In Theosophical Foundation Pty Ltd v. Commissioner of Land Tax (NSW) [1966] 67 SR (NSW), Sugerman JA defines society at 82:

Paragraph 2 of Taxation Determination TD 95/56 considers the definition of 'association' as follows:

The Macquarie Dictionary 2001, 5th edition (The Macquarie Library Pty Ltd, Macquarie University) defines 'club' as a group of persons organised for a social, literary, sporting, political, or other purpose, regulated by rules agreed by its members.

The interpretations of society, association or club as described above, emphasise on a 'body of persons' and 'an organisation of people' with a 'common purpose'. The entity is a company limited by guarantee, an organisation of people with a common purpose (as per its objects) and a formal structure. It is considered to be a society or association.

2. It must be established for the purpose of promoting the development of Australian manufacturing resources.

The term 'development' is used in section 50-40 of the ITAA 1997 in a commercial or business sense. It comprehends all the elements which must be taken into account to ensure that the specified resources are best used.

The meaning of 'development' was examined by the High Court in the case of
FC of T v. Broken Hill Pty Co. Ltd
69 ATC 4028; 1 ATR 40 where, in considering the phrase 'development of mining property' the majority of the High Court accepted the interpretation of Kitto J:

The promotion of development may be direct or indirect. Methods of promoting resources include marketing, training, research, education, introduction of new and improved classes of product and facilitation of cooperation, and similar activities (refer page 22 of the Income tax guide for non-profit organisations).

The entity, as set out in its Constitution and incorporating the activities of promoting safety, professionalism and integrity of its industry, advocating and responding on national issues of importance to its industry, creating strategies to enhance the credibility and longevity of the industry in a pro-active sense, is established to promote their industry's manufacturing resources in Australia. We now will consider if their industry qualifies as a manufacturing resource of Australia.

Pursuant to item 8.2(d) of section 50-40 of the ITAA 1997 the manufacturing resource must be a resource of Australia. It is a matter of fact and degree whether an association is predominantly for the purpose of promoting the development of Australian resources. Taxation Ruling IT 2415 emphasises that the section refers to the development of resources of Australia. It states at paragraph 8:

The entity is considered to be promoting, in a business sense, the development of an Australian resource.

Resources or their elements include infrastructure, plant and equipment, livestock, personnel, knowledge, expertise and skills. An industry's businesses and their assets may be resources. Sheppard J said in Australian Insurance Association at 79 ATC 4573; 10 ATR 337: '... the undertakings of the Australian insurance companies, viewed as a whole, are a resource of Australia. I use the word "undertakings" in the broadest sense. I include within it not only the businesses of the various companies but also their assets and the knowledge and skill of their staffs.'

Based upon the above discussion, it is accepted that the entity has a purpose to promote the development of Australian manufacturing resources through their activities representing the businesses and expertise of their members. To qualify for exemption under item 8.2(d) of the table in section 50-40 of the ITAA 1997, that purpose must be the dominant purpose for which the association was established. Therefore, both the entity's dominant objects as per its Constitution and its dominant activity must be for this purpose.

The entity's primary purpose in its Constitution is that the entity is established to promote their industry and further the standards, reputation and ethics of their industry

This is achieved by representation of its member organisations, advancement of professional standards and ethics to ensure acceptable operational standards are met in their industry. In addition, the entity partners with training providers as described in the facts of this case. In accordance with paragraphs 9 and 10 of IT 2415 industry training is an acceptable activity for purposes of promotion of a specified resource of Australia, in this case manufacturing resources of Australia.

It is accepted that the entity is established principally for the purpose of promoting the development of Australian manufacturing resources.

Special Condition.

The entity must not be carried on for the profit or gain of its individual members.

Where an association operates principally to confer benefits to its members jointly or as a group, it is unlikely to be predominantly for promotion of resource development and therefore not exempt from income tax under item 8.2(c) of section 50-40 of the ITAA 1997. If an association is carried on for the profit or gain of its individual members, it will fail the non-profit requirement. Such a purpose is unlikely to be consistent with the purpose of promoting resource development. It is necessary to distinguish from the dominant purpose of providing benefits to members as a group from the incidental benefit which will often flow to members from activities promoting the development of resources with which they are involved.

An association usually ensures they operate on a non-profit basis by including non-profit clauses in their constituent documents. It is considered that the entity has acceptable non-profit clauses in its Constitution.

It is also necessary that the association's actions are consistent with their constituent documents. As the cases below illustrate, there are instances where benefits to members have been accepted. However, what is important to distinguish is whether benefits are conferred to members along with others in the community or as individual members.

The phrase 'profit or gain of its individual members' was considered in the case Commissioner of Taxation v Co-operative Bulk Handling limited [2010] FCAFC 155 (CBH case). In the CBH case, the members had to be customers of CBH. However, CBH's services were not restricted to members; non-members could also contract for CBH's bulk handling services. It was held that CBH made its facilities available to any grain trader or miller, whether or not they were members. Further, it was held at 112:

From the information provided the members of the entity do receive benefits. However, apart from industry information and improvement in their industry from the actions of the entity, members do not appear to benefit to a greater extent than non-members. It is considered that the benefits provided to members do not accrue to them as 'individual members'.

However, benefits which are received jointly as members and which are incidental to the pursuit of the association's objects, will not prevent it from passing the non-profit test. For example business members will commonly receive some advantages, including financial advantages, as an incidental result of resource development (Australian Insurance Association case).

In the case of Inland Revenue Commissioners v Yorkshire Agricultural Society (1928) 1 KB 611, the provision of specific benefits to members to induce membership were disregarded. Although the Society applied as a charitable institution, it was found that the benefits to the members in the form of various privileges attaching to membership could be disregarded. The fact that benefits accrued to members of the Society did not detract from the fact that the Society had been established for the purpose of improvement of agriculture as a whole and not for any confined purpose of benefiting only the particular members of the Society. His Lordship said at 631:

It can be seen from the entity's website and information provided that member benefits are designed to add to the member's industry knowledge and assist them to learn the latest industry trends and methods by way of exhibitions, training and award ceremonies. These benefits are directly related to the greater purpose of promoting their industry.as a whole, a manufacturing resource of Australia. It is considered that the entity does not exist principally to confer benefits on its members.

Conclusion

It is considered that the entity is a non-profit association that meets the requirements of item 8.2(d) of the table in section 50-40 of the ITAA 1997 and its ordinary and statutory income is exempt from income tax under section 50-1 of the ITAA 1997.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).