Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012624962978

Ruling

Subject: Government financial hardship payment to business

1. Are your ex gratia payments (EGP) received from the government assessable income under section 6-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) in the income year in which they were derived (being the income year in which the invoices were dated)?

2. Are the EGP assessable as a bounty or subsidy under section 15-10 of the ITAA 1997?

3. Are the EGP assessable under the capital gains tax provisions in Division 104 of the ITAA 1997?

4. If assessable under Division 104, are the general CGT discount and/or other small business concessions available, assuming the requirements of Division 152 of ITAA 1997 are met?

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ending 30 June 2013

Year ending 30 June 2014

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2012

Relevant facts and circumstances

You carry on a business and applied for a government industry exit grant but did not qualify. However, in recognition of your special circumstances, the government provided some ex gratia payments to you specifically under a funding package to provide immediate assistance to businesses that suffered significant financial hardship. You were explicitly advised you received your EGP:

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 6-5

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 15-10

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-25

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 118-20

Reasons for decision

Summary

Your EGP were paid explicitly in reference to your existing business to address your current financial hardship at the time. They were not industry exit payments to cease business and there is no evidence to show your EGP were compensation for loss of future income (capacity) and goodwill. It follows they are assessable under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997 as ordinary income in the income year in which they were derived. As they are assessable as ordinary income under section 6-5, they will not be assessable under section 15-10. Also, your payment in a lump sum does not require a conclusion that the payment is capital (per paragraph 85 of TR 2006/3).

Detailed reasoning

Section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997 is about ordinary income and provides that if you are an Australian resident, your assessable income includes the ordinary income you derived directly or indirectly from all sources, whether in or out of Australia, during the income year.

Section 15-10 of the ITAA 1997 is about bounties and subsidies and provides that your assessable income includes a bounty or subsidy that you receive in relation to carrying on a business and is not assessable as ordinary income under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997.

Section 104-25 of the ITAA 1997 is about CGT event C2 and provides you make a capital gain if the capital proceeds from the ending of your ownership of an intangible CGT asset are more than the asset's cost base.

Section 118-20 of the ITAA 1997 is an anti-overlap provision and, in general, provides a capital gain you make from a CGT event is reduced if, because of the event, a provision of this Act (outside of this Part) includes an amount (for any income year) in your assessable income.

Taxation Ruling TR 2006/3 is about government payments to industry to assist entities (including individuals) to continue, commence or cease business. The following paragraphs of TR 2006/3 are relevant for consideration in your case:

Government payments to continue business

Taxation Ruling TR 95/35 is about capital gains and the treatment of compensation receipts. It defines a 'right to seek compensation' and an 'undissected lump sum compensation receipt' as follows:

Paragraph 18 of TR 95/35 states if the amount of compensation received is an undissected lump sum, the whole amount is treated as being consideration received for the disposal of the right to seek compensation (which will constituted CGT event C2 under section 104-25 of the ITAA 1997).

In your case, the EGP you received were specifically described as "in recognition of the specific circumstances of your business...the financial detriment you have experienced…intended to assist you to address your current financial hardship". Since this meets the descriptions in paragraphs 10 to 14 of TR 2006/3, i.e., a GPI to assist the continuing of your business, your EGP received are assessable as ordinary income under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997 in the year in which they are derived (being the income year in which the invoices were dated). As the EGP are assessable as ordinary income under section 6-5, they are not assessable as a bounty or subsidy under section 15-10 of the ITAA 1997.

Your EGP received was not for ceasing your business or a portion of it, since you were not required to agree to cease all or a part of your business. Your EGP were also not explicitly for the loss in value of depreciating assets since the EGP was never described as such. In other words, your EGP was not received in such circumstances as described in example 13 of TR 2006/3.

Contrary to your assertions in your private ruling application, there is no evidence to support your EGP were compensation for loss of future income (capacity) and goodwill. Instead, the EGP were explicitly paid to assist you to address your current financial hardship.

Although your EGP were also un-dissected lump sum compensation receipts in respect of a right to receive compensation, the anti-overlap provision in section 118-20 of the ITAA 1997 results in them not being accounted for under the capital gains tax provisions in Parts 3-1 and 3-3 of the ITAA 1997.

To conclude, your EGP were paid in reference to your existing business for financial hardship, i.e., as income replacement. It follows they are assessable under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997 as ordinary income. Per paragraph 85 of TR 2006/3, the EGP in a lump sum does not require a conclusion that the payment is capital.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).