Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private advice

Authorisation Number: 1012635596822

Ruling

Subject: Market value of goodwill

Question 1

If the business activities of Company X cease and the same (or near same) business activities are carried out by Company A, will the Commissioner consider that, for the purpose of subsection 116-30(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997), the market value of goodwill in Company X is nil in respect of any capital gains tax (CGT) event happening within the AXY group of companies?

Answer

Yes.

Question 2

If the business activities of Company Y cease and the same (or near same) business activities are carried out by Company A, will the Commissioner consider that, for the purpose of subsection 116-30(1) of the ITAA 1997, the market value of goodwill in Company Y is nil in respect of any CGT event happening within the AXY group of companies?

Answer

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following period

2014 income year

The scheme commences

During the 2014 income year

Relevant facts and circumstances

Company A has business operations in various states of Australia.

Company X and Company Y have operated as agencies or branches of Company A, so as to serve the local customers of the business of Company A in the relevant states.

No License was ever drafted between Company A and Company X/Company Y. All three companies are controlled by the same entity.

Invoicing for the sale of business has always been done on the Company A letterhead and the customer statements are sent under the name of Company A.

All the marketing activities of business were and are undertaken by Company A.

All contracts with vital stock suppliers of the business have always been and continue to be with Company A.

Company A, Company X and Company Y together have been referred to as AXY group.

The three companies form the one group for GST purposes, with Company A being the head entity.

Company X and Company Y do not have any trademark or other intellectual property in respect of their business.

All funding and working capital for the branches/divisions initially came from Company A and the working capital continues to be provided by Company A to Company X and Company Y.

All head office functions of the business are conducted solely by Company A.

It has been proposed that the current activities carried out by Company X and Company Y cease and the two companies wound up.

Company A would directly resume all interstate operations of the business.

The restructure will simplify the Group's corporate structure and reduce annual accounting and compliance costs.

A valuation of the Company X and Company Y was undertaken by DEF and the valuation report concluded that the value of Company X and Company Y under both the CMFE and DCF methodologies is less than the value of its net assets. It further states that Company X and Company Y have no goodwill and it does not contribute in any way to the AXY group business valuation.

A critique of the valuation report by the Australian Valuation Office (AVO) states that the conclusions in the report with regard to the allocation of AXY group goodwill to be acceptable.

Company A will not pay any consideration in relation to goodwill to Company X and Company Y for the cessation of their operations and the same (or near same) business activities being carried out by Company A.

Reasons for decision

Unless otherwise specified, all legislative references are to the ITAA 1997.

Question 1

Summary

The Commissioner accepts that the market value of goodwill in Company X is nil in respect of any CGT event happening to the goodwill of Company X for the purpose of subsection 116-30(1) upon the cessation of business activities by Company X.

Detailed reasoning

1. Background

2. Nature of CGT events happening to the goodwill of Company X

3. Meaning of goodwill

4. Application of market value rules to the goodwill of Company X

5. Meaning of market value

6. Market value of goodwill

Question 2

Summary

The Commissioner accepts that the market value of goodwill in Company Y is nil in respect of any CGT event happening to the goodwill of Company Y for the purpose of subsection 116-30(1) upon the cessation of business activities by Company Y.

Detailed reasoning

The valuation report by DEF concluded that the value of Company Y under both the CMFE and DCF methodologies is less than the value of its net assets. It further states that Company Y has no goodwill and it does not contribute in any way to the AXY group business valuation.

A critique of the valuation report by AVO states that the conclusions in the report with regard to the allocation of CH Group goodwill to be acceptable.

Accordingly it is considered that for the for the purpose of subsection 116-30(1), the market value of goodwill in Company Y is nil in respect of any CGT event happening to the goodwill of Company X if the business activities of Company Y cease.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).