Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private advice

Authorisation Number: 1012636017571

Ruling

Subject: Capital gains tax - deceased estate - Commissioner's discretion to extend the two year period - main residence exemption

Question

Will the Commissioner exercise discretion under subsection 118-195(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) and allow an extension of time to the two year period?

Answer

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ended 30 June 2014.

The scheme commences on

1 July 2013.

Relevant facts and circumstances

You and your siblings inherited your late parent's house and placed the property on the market for private sale on a date.

Due to the property's location and lack of services, it proved exceedingly difficult to sell. After some time, you chose to appoint an agent to assist with selling the property.

The property was not rented during this time.

During this time, your marriage broke down with your spouse leaving without notice which meant you had to quit work and care for your children on your own.

Also, a sibling's marriage broke down with the spouse leaving the sibling and children on their own. This was extremely hard to cope with and they still have issues now.

You and this sibling live closest to the house to be able to keep it maintained, whereas the other siblings live further away. This proved difficult in keeping the property maintained while trying your best to have it sold as quickly as possible.

These circumstances were beyond your control, with the economic times and the location of the property having a lot to do with the time taken to sell the property.

The two year period ended on a date but the property was already under contract from a date with settlement occurring on a date.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 104-10

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 118-130(3)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 118-195

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 118-195(1)

Reasons for decision

A capital gain or capital loss is disregarded under section 118-195 of the ITAA 1997 where a capital gains tax event happens to a dwelling if it passed to you as an individual beneficiary of a deceased estate or you owned it as the trustee of the deceased estate.

The availability of the exemption is dependent upon:

For a dwelling acquired by the deceased, you will be entitled to a full exemption if:

In your case, when the deceased died, an interest in the dwelling passed to you. The dwelling was the deceased's main residence prior to death, and at that time, was not being used to produce assessable income. However, the dwelling was not occupied by a relevant individual after the deceased's death and therefore this basis of exemption is not available.

Subsection 118-130(3) of the ITAA 1997 provides that where the sale or other disposal of the dwelling proceeds under a contract, the ownership interest ends at the time of settlement of the contract of sale and not at the time of entering the contract.

The dwelling sale settled more than two years after the deceased's death, therefore, the alternative basis of exemption is also not satisfied.

However, subsection 118-195(1) of the ITAA 1997 confers on the Commissioner discretion to extend the two year exemption period, thus this alternative basis of exemption in the provision may apply.

The following is a non-exhaustive list of situations in which the Commissioner would be expected to exercise the discretion:

The delay in disposing of the property was caused by unexpected delays in the settlement of the property for reasons outside the beneficiary or trustee's control and these delays prevented you from disposing of the property within the two year time limit.

In determining whether or not to grant an extension the Commissioner is also expected to consider whether and to what extent the dwelling is used to produce assessable income and how long the trustee or beneficiary held it.

Having considered the relevant facts, the Commissioner is able to apply his discretion under subsection 118-195(1) of the ITAA 1997 and allow an extension to the two year time limit.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).