Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1012693482432

Ruling

Subject: Exempt entities - Not for profit organisation

Question 1

Is the entity a society or association established for the purpose of promoting the development of tourism pursuant to item 8.1(b) of the table in section 50-40 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following periods

1 July 2014 to 30 June 2024

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2014

Relevant facts and circumstances

The incorporated entity has applied for a ruling to reconfirm their income tax exemption as an entity established for the purpose of promoting the development of tourism.

The entity has previously applied for many rulings on the same issue. The entity's activities, its Constitution or section 50-40 of ITAA 1997 has changed since the last Private Ruling which confirmed the entity's income tax exempt status.

Reasons for decision

Basic conditions

To be entitled to income tax exemption under item 8.1(b) of section 50-40 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA1997), an entity must satisfy the following:

The ATO publication Income Tax Guide for Non-Profit Organisations (the Guide) provides the following on the non-profit requirement:

Clauses of the entity's constitution prevent it from distributing income and property to members. There is no evidence from the facts that the entity is acting contrary to the prohibition.

The entity is not carried on for the profit or gain of its members.

Established for the purpose of promoting the development of tourism.

'Tourism' is not defined in the ITAA 1997, and is taken to have its ordinary meaning.

The New Shorter Oxford Dictionary, Vol 2 (N-Z), provides the following meaning:

The objects and activities of the entity show that the sole purpose is to promote Australian tourism. The entity is considered to be concerned with tourism.

Promoting the development of tourism

To be exempt under item 8.1(b) it is not enough that the entity be concerned with tourism, rather, the entity must be concerned with the development of tourism.

Taxation Ruling IT 2415 Income tax: associations promoting development of Australian resources, provides that 'development', in the context of section 50-40, has the following meaning:

The entity is a national representative tourism body. Its membership comprises of organisations in each of the states and territories of Australia (all of which are non-profit). As the national representative tourism body the entity represents its state and territory organisations at national and international forums. The state and territory bodies rely on the entity to promote the market in Australia.

To this end, the entity runs a website promoting the industry that promotes tourism in Australia and the Australian tourism market, publishes brochures and other publications on Australian tourism locations, and has specific overseas countries marketing representatives that attend international trade shows, consumer shows and agent road shows to promote the entity and Australian destinations.

The objects and activities of the entity are considered to be concerned with growing the tourism market in Australia. In Case W49 89 ATC 469, P.M Roach (Senior Member) stated:

The entity is considered to be promoting the development of tourism.

The fact that the entity assists its member organisations to meet their independent objectives does not contradict the conclusion that its purpose is promoting the development of tourism. Commonality of purpose in this context helps rather than hinders a finding that the character of a peak or service entity is similar to that of its members. This principle has been confirmed in Ziliani v. Sydney City Council (1985) 56 LGRA 58 (where a peak body that provided services to charitable show societies was accepted as a charity), and in a public benevolent institution context in Australian Council for Overseas Aid v. FC of T 80 ATC 4575 (where a body set up by public benevolent institutions to provide services to them was accepted as being itself a public benevolent institution).

It is, therefore, considered the entity is entitled to income tax exemption under item 8.1(b) of section 50-40 of the ITAA 1997 as a non-profit society or association established for the purpose of promoting the development of tourism.

Period of Ruling

The law does not require either the applicant or the Commissioner to specify the period applicable to a private ruling. However, our practice is to specify the years of income or periods to which the ruling applies, in the interests of providing certainty.

Private rulings may be given for:

Normally, a ruling will be for the period specified by the applicant. There may be occasions, however, where we consider that a ruling needs to cover a different period from that specified in the application. When this occurs, the ruling must specify the time it applies to the taxpayer.

Following consultation, the policy in relation to determining the period for provision of a private ruling has changed. The previous guideline of issuing a ruling for not more than 3 to 4 years has been removed, and the appropriate length of time for which to rule is determined by the case officer and approving officer.

In determining the appropriate length of time for which to rule, consideration has been made to:

• the likelihood of a change to the law, and

• the likelihood of changes to the facts of the scheme

These considerations are balanced against the facts of the case.

It is important to note that a private ruling will no longer apply, and the taxpayer will no longer be protected by it:

In addition, a court may refuse to entertain a case based on a ruling if it considers that the facts or tax law are so likely to change that it would make the case of no legal consequence to either of the parties.

The entity has requested a ruling for a ten year period. They have cited significant administrative costs, ongoing organisational stability and the Commissioner's commitment to cut red tape as reasons for requesting the extended period. The entity has supported their request by;

As a result of the policy change, the unlikely change to the facts and the lack of risk to revenue it is considered reasonable to issue the ruling for a ten year period.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).