Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1012703324889

Ruling

Subject: GST Enterprise and Property Development

Question 1

Does goods and services tax (GST) apply to the subdivision and sale of land that is attached to your principal place of residence?

Answer

No.

Relevant facts and circumstances

The property

The development

Relevant legislative provisions

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) 1999

Section 9-5

Section 9-20

Section 23-5

Reasons for decision

Issue 1

Question 1

Summary

The subdivision and sale of the property is not subject to GST, the subdivision and sale of the subdivided lots is not an enterprise but a mere realisation of a capital asset.

Detailed reasoning

Section 7-1 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act) provides that you must pay GST on any taxable supply that you make.

Section 9-5 of the GST Act defines a taxable supply. It states:

Items marked with an asterisk (*) are defined in the Dictionary at section 195-1 of the GST Act.

In your case, you have made or will make supplies for consideration and the supplies are/will be connected with Australia. It must now be determined whether the supplies are/will be made in the course or furtherance of an enterprise that you carry on, and whether you were required to be registered for GST.

Under section 23-5 of the GST Act you are required to be registered if:

'Enterprise' is defined in subsection 9-20(1) of the GST Act. It states:

Miscellaneous Taxation Ruling MT 2006/1 The New Tax System: the meaning of entity carrying on an enterprise for the purposes of entitlement to an Australian Business Number discusses when an entity can be said to be carrying on an enterprise. Goods and Services Tax Determination GSTD 2006/6 Goods and services tax: does MT2006/1 have equal application to the meaning of 'entity' and 'enterprise' for the purposes of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999? GSTD 2006/6 provides that the reasons in MT 2006/1 are considered to apply equally to the term 'enterprise' in the GST Act and can be relied on for GST purposes.

Paragraph 154 of MT 2006/1 provides that it is necessary to identify one activity or a series of activities that amount to an enterprise. Paragraph 159 provides that whether or not an activity or series of activities amounts to an enterprise is a question of fact and degree having regard to all of the circumstances of the case. Example 15 in MT 2006/1 provides that an activity such as the selling of an asset may not of itself amount to an enterprise but account should also be taken of the other activities leading up to the sale to determine if an enterprise has been carried on.

In the form of a business

An enterprise includes an activity, or series of activities, done in the form of business. MT 2006/1 presents some indicators of business derived from case law. These are:

There is no single test to determine whether a business is being carried on.

In your case, you have not conducted a significant commercial activity in the subdivision of the property and you do not intend to engage in a significant commercial activity. You have not subdivided property before. The subdivision activity was carried on in a businesslike manner and records were kept.

To complete the sub-division as per council specifications, you engaged contractors to design works and carry these out, which included roads (internal and external), street lighting, underground power, telephone, water, kerb and channel, storm water path ways, bollards and landscaping.

The activities were of a reasonable size and scale. No business plan exists and there were no commercial sales of product. You do not have relevant knowledge or skill in subdividing property, and you engaged contractors and a real estate agent. Considering these factors, the sale of subdivided lots was not in the form of a business.

In the form of an adventure or concern in the nature of trade

There is also no single test to determine what is an adventure or concern in the nature of trade. MT 2006/1 recognises case law stipulating that an adventure or concern in the nature of trade implies a commercial, profit-making undertaking or scheme.

Paragraph 244 of MT 2006/1 provides that this undertaking must have the characteristics of a business deal and be of a revenue nature. Paragraph 247 of MT 2006/1 provides that where the property being sold provides personal enjoyment to the owner it is more likely to be an investment rather than a trading asset. Paragraphs 249 to 255 of MT 2006/1 provide that the length of ownership, the frequency of the transactions, supplementary work on the property, the circumstances that were responsible for the realisation and the motive are also relevant factors when determining whether an activity is in the form of an adventure or concern in the nature of trade.

In your case, you have owned the property for a long period of time as your primary residence. The property has provided personal enjoyment to you as your home. You engaged in the subdivision activity due to council pressure and also in an attempt to realise the value of your property. This subdivision activity is infrequent, as you have not made any other earlier attempts to subdivide the property. Considering these factors, the sale of the subdivided lots was not in the form of an adventure or concern in the nature of trade.

Isolated transactions and sales of real property

MT 2006/1 also provides guidance on whether an entity is carrying on an enterprise where there is a 'one off' sale of real property. Paragraph 266 of MT 2006/1 provides that in determining whether activities relating to isolated transactions are an enterprise or are the mere realisation of a capital asset, it is necessary to examine the facts and circumstances of each particular case. No single factor will be determinative rather it will be a combination of factors that will lead to a conclusion as to the character of the activities.

Paragraph 265 of MT 2006/1 states factors to consider when determining whether an isolated sale of real property is a business or a concern in the nature of trade. These are:

In your case, there is no change of purpose for which the land was held; it was your primary residence. You did not acquire any additional land. The parcel of land as a whole was not brought into account as a business asset. You did not borrow money to finance the subdivision. You engaged contractors to carry out the subdivision. You did not develop the land beyond that necessary to secure Council approval for the subdivision. You have not erected any buildings on the land as part of the subdivision. Considering these factors, your sale of subdivided lots is/will be the mere realisation of a capital asset.

As the sale of the property is a mere realisation of a capital asset, it is not made in the course or furtherance of an enterprise that you carry on.

As all the requirements in section 9-5 of the GST Act are not met the sales of your subdivided lots are not taxable supplies. There is no requirement to report GST on the sale of the lots and you cannot claim input tax credits for the associated acquisitions.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).