| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1012721168154
Ruling
Subject: Non-commercial loss - Commissioner's discretion
Question
Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to allow you to include any losses from your business activity in your calculation of taxable income for the 2013-14 to 2015-16 financial years?
Answer
No.
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ended 30 June 2014
Year ended 30 June 2015
Year ended 30 June 2016
The scheme commences on:
The scheme has commenced
Relevant facts and circumstances
You satisfy the <$250,000 income requirement set out in subsection 35-10(2E) of the ITAA 1997.
You carry on a business of manufacturing clothing (the business).
You contend that you commenced the business in the relevant financial year.
In this year you ceased employment to commence drafting and sampling of patterns and designs for the business.
You applied to Trademark for a label and received a notice of acceptance in the relevant financial year.
You advised that initial start-up costs for the business are high as you are required to pay for production costs upfront, before sales can be made.
As the business gains a trustworthy reputation it will generally progress to a 30, 60 and then 90 day invoice payment period. This should happen over several 'seasons'.
You provided income projections for the business projections, which indicated that you will earn assessable income from the business in the 20XX financial year.
You created a business plan based on your own experience in the industry, and advice from a retail forecasting planner and a fashion retail agent.
The business plan indicates that there is generally a three year lead time for your industry.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(1)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(2)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(2E)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 35-55(1)(b)
Reasons for decision
For the 2009-10 and later financial years, Division 35 of the ITAA 1997 will apply to defer a non-commercial loss from a business activity unless:
• you satisfy the income requirement and you pass one of the four tests
• the exceptions apply
• the Commissioner exercises his discretion.
In your situation, none of the exceptions would apply and although you satisfy the income requirement, you do not meet any of the four tests in the years of income under consideration. Your losses are therefore subject to the deferral rule, unless the Commissioner exercises his discretion.
The relevant discretion may be exercised for the income year in question where:
• it is in the nature of the business activity that there will be a period of time before it can be expected to pass one of the four tests
• there is an objective expectation your business activity will produce a tax profit or meet one of the four tests within a commercially viable period for your industry.
Having regard to your full circumstances, it is not accepted that it is in the nature of the business activity that has prevented one of the four tests being passed.
This discretion is intended to cover a business activity where there is an inherent period of time between the commencement of the activity and the production of assessable income. For example, an activity involving the planting of hardwood trees for harvest, where many years would pass before the activity could reasonably be expected to produce income.
For the discretion to be applied there needs to be an inherent or innate feature of the activity resulting in an inability to produce income in the year of commencement and (in most cases) a number of years thereafter. Further examples that fall into this category are forestry, viticulture and certain horticultural activities.
The note above does not support any view that the discretion should be exercised for any start-up activity that is yet, for example, to satisfy the assessable income test in section 35-30 of the ITAA 1997, simply because of the small scale on which it was started, or because a client base or reputation is being built up.
We do not consider that there is a lead time between the commencement of your activity and the production of any assessable income. Your business should be able to generate income from sales in your first financial year of operation. Therefore we do not consider that there is anything inherent or innate in the nature of your business activity that it has not yet been able to satisfy one of the tests. Your activity is of a type that is able to produce assessable income quite soon after its commencement.
Consequently the Commissioner will not exercise his discretion for the relevant financial years.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
