Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1012740871174

Ruling

Subject: GST and licence to enter and occupy

Question 1

Will the granting of rights and the undertaking of obligations by C and T upon entry into the Project Deed and various other agreements and licences that will be entered into (Project Documents) give rise to any taxable supply made by C to T or made by T to C?

Answer

No.

Question 2

Will either C or T will be liable to GST by reference to 'non-monetary' consideration for the purposes of section 9-15 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act) for supplies made by C to T or supplies made by T to C as part of the Licence Structure?

Answer

No.

Relevant facts and circumstances

Specific rights and obligations to be considered are:

The Project is to be delivered in the following two packages:

Relevant legislative provisions

Reasons for decision

Questions 1 and 2

Summary

The Project Deed, in the Recitals notes in part that:

The Project Deed notes that each task has specific and discrete consideration being the Construction Price and Monthly Services Payments and indicates that the successful completion of each task is the parties' desired outcomes. Subsequently, the granting of licences and entering into obligations outlined are not outcomes sought in their own right, but something akin to components or terms and conditions that are necessarily granted or fulfilled in order to achieve the desired outcome (supply) i.e. the design, construction and maintenance of the works and subsequent provision of services.

This reasoning accords with the view taken by the Commissioner in paragraphs 69 and 70 of GSTR 2006/9:

In the case at hand we accept that the granting of the stated licences by T is simply part of the circumstances in which the supply under the Project Deed is to be made by C. It follows that we accept that T is not making discrete supplies in granting the licences.

Therefore the handover by C of assets as contemplated in the Project Deed are similarly viewed to be part of the circumstances in which C makes the greater supply. Alternatively, the handover could be viewed as evidence of the greater supply that C is required to make.

Under this reasoning, the granting of the licences and the undertaking of the obligations are not supplies at all; it follows that such acts cannot be taxable supplies. Further, C and T cannot therefore be liable to GST by reference to 'non-monetary' consideration for the purposes of section 9-15 of the GST Act for supplies made by C to T or supplies made by T to C as part of the Licence Structure. This view is supported by the Commissioner's statement at paragraph 84 of GSTR 2001/6:


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).