Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1012742294015

Ruling

Subject: Income tax: interest expense deductions and Part IVA

Question 1

Will the Commissioner of Taxation make a determination pursuant to section 177F(1)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) or apply any other section of the Act, to deny the trustee for Trust A a deduction for the whole or part of the interest costs incurred on borrowings to subscribe for shares in the company?

Answer

No

This ruling applies for the following periods:

1 March 2014 - 30 June 2014

1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015

1 July 2015 - 30 June 2016

1 July 2016 - 30 June 2017

The scheme commences on:

Expected commencement during the 2013-14 income year

Relevant facts and circumstances

The company is a resident private company with the trustee for Trust A and an unrelated entity each having 50% ownership in the company.

The company owns 50% of certain real estate and plant (with the remaining 50% owned by an unrelated entity).

The real estate is leased to an associated entity which carries on a business in the property.

There is no written lease agreement between the company and the associated entity. The parties agree from time to time on the amount of rent. The directors consider that the rent is at market value from their experience in the industry.

The company has a third party debt (a bank bill facility).

The company has a related party debt. There is no written agreement for the payment of interest or the repayment of capital in relation to the related party debt. The debit is repayable at call.

The company has been incurring tax losses for a number of years.

The audited statutory accounts for the company for the year ended 30 June 2013 disclose a deficiency in net assets and the auditors expressed concern that there was significant uncertainty regarding the company's continuation as a going concern.

It is considered that these borrowing costs are contributing to the erosion of the company's profitability and therefore a transaction has been proposed which will enable the company to retire the bank bill facility.

The proposed transaction involves the following steps:

The proposed refinancing should result in a number of commercial benefits.

The primary purpose for the trustee for Trust A entering into the proposed transaction is to improve the company's financial position, in particular, ensuring the company is not insolvent, which could have significant consequences for members of the company who also sit on other company boards.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Part IVA

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 subsection 177A(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 177C

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 177CB

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 subsection 177D(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 subsection 177D(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 paragraph 177F(1)(b)

Reasons for decision

On the face of it, the trustee for Trust A would be allowed to claim deductions for the interest it incurs on the funds borrowed under the proposed transaction. This would be because the trust would be deriving assessable income from the company in the form of dividends or at least have a reasonable expectation of deriving such income. The interest expense would be deductible under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.

The broader question is whether access to such deductions would provide a tax benefit to the trust which may lead to the Commissioner making a determination under section 177F of the ITAA 1936 to cancel the tax benefit.

Based on the information provided by the applicant, it appears that overall there is a tax benefit that would flow to the trustee for Trust A in relation to the deductions for interest on the borrowed funds if it proceeded with the proposed transaction.

However, following a detailed examination of the relevant scheme, having regards to the matters listed under subsection 177D(2) of the ITAA 1936 and the commercial benefits of the proposed scheme, we conclude that the trustee for Trust A would not be entering into the scheme for the sole or dominant purpose of obtaining a tax benefit.

The Commissioner will therefore not make a determination under Part IVA of the ITAA 1936 to prevent the trust from claiming deductions for interest incurred stemming from the proposed transaction.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).