Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1012771064638

Ruling

Subject: Trust resettlement

Question 1

Would the removal of a beneficiary from the trust deed constitute a resettlement of the trust for CGT purposes?

Answer:

No

Question 2

Would resignation of the Appointor of the trust constitute resettlement of the trust for CGT purposes?

Answer:

No

Question 3

Would a renunciation signed by beneficiaries of the trust, X and Y, declaring that they will never accept any further benefits from the trust, constitute a resettlement of the trust?

Answer:

No

This ruling applies for the following period(s)

Year ending 30 June 2015

The scheme commences on

1 July 2014

Relevant facts and circumstances

The arrangement that is the subject of the private ruling is described below. This description is based on the following documents. These documents form part of and are to be read with this description. The relevant documents are:

A clause of the Trust Deed provides;

A further clause of the Trust Deed provides;

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-55

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-60

Reasons for decision

Trust resettlement - CGT event E1 or E2

CGT event E1 happens if a trust is created over a CGT asset by declaration or settlement (subsection 104-55(1) of the ITAA 1997).

CGT event E2 happens if a taxpayer transfers a CGT asset to an existing trust (subsection 104-60(1) of the ITAA 1997).

Taxation Determination TD 2012/21 which discusses CGT events E1 and E2, sets out the Commissioner's view in respect to trust resettlements and whether or not a resettlement has occurred. TD 2012/21 asserts that an amendment to the terms of a trust will not result in the termination of a trust as long as:

Application to your circumstances

Based on the information provided;

Therefore, as any amendment made to the Trust Deed to remove X and Y as specified beneficiaries will be made pursuant to a valid exercise of power contained within the trust deed, with the consent of the guardian, being X, the making of these resolutions will not give rise to the happening of a CGT event.

Similarly, as there is a specific clause allowing an appointor to renounce their position, the removal of X as appointor of the trust (being an amendment made pursuant to a valid exercise of power contained in the trust deed) will also not give rise to the happening of a CGT event.

Accordingly, there will be no resettlement of the trust when X and Y renounce their interests in the family trust, nor when X renounces their role as appointor.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).