Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1012791264747

Ruling

Subject: Removal and replacement of damaged asbestos roof

Question

Are you entitled to a deduction for your share of the cost of removing the damaged asbestos roof on your rental property and replacing it with a colorbond roof?

Answer

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following periods

Year ended 30 June 2015

Year ended 30 June 2016

The scheme commences on

1 July 2014

Relevant facts and circumstances

You and your spouse purchased a rental property several years ago.

The asbestos roof on the property was in good to fair condition when the property was acquired.

The property has existing tenants and has always been rented or available for rent.

You have recently been made aware that the roof is leaking and asbestos fibres are loose and being dislodged, causing a health hazard to your tenants and neighbours.

You have received several quotes and have been advised by all roofing contractors that they are unable to repair asbestos sheeting and that the only way to fix the problem is to replace the entire roof with an equivalent material being colorbond as the original roof material is no longer available.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 25-10

Reasons for decision

Section 25-10 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) allows a deduction for the cost of repairs to premises used for income producing purposes. However, subsection 25-10(3) of the ITAA 1997 does not allow a deduction for repairs where the expenditure is of a capital nature.

Taxation Ruling TR 97/23 Income tax: deductions for repairs, indicates that expenditure for repairs to property is of a capital nature where:

The word 'repair' is not defined within the taxation legislation.  Accordingly, it takes its ordinary meaning. TR 97/23 states that the word 'repair' ordinarily means the remedying or making good of defects in, damage to, or deterioration of, property to be repaired (being defects, damage or deterioration in a mechanical and physical sense) and contemplates the continued existence of the property.

An 'entirety' is defined as something 'separately identifiable as a principal item of capital equipment' (Lindsay v. FC of T (1960) 106 CLR 377 at 385; (1960) 12 ATD 197 at 201), Paragraph 40 of TR 97/23 specifically states that a roof is only part of a building and does not constitute an 'entirety'. The building itself is the 'entirety'.

In your case, your rental property roof had deteriorated and is leaking in a number of places. It is accepted the use of colorbond to replace the asbestos roofing constitutes a repair as the change in material will not improve the efficiency or function of the property. The roof will merely be repaired by its modern equivalent which restores the original function.

Therefore, you are entitled to a deduction for your share of the cost of replacing the roof of your rental property under section 25-10 of the ITAA 1997.

Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).