Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1012802796503

Ruling

Subject: CGT - SBC - Control - Commissioner's discretion

Question 1

Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion under subsection 328-125(6) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 to determine that Trust One does not control the Partnership?

Answer

Yes.

Question 2

Does A apportion the properties held by the Partnership based on the trust's ownership percentage when calculating their maximum net asset value?

Answer

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following period(s)

Year ended 30 June 2014

Year ended 30 June 2015

Year ended 30 June 2016.

The scheme commences on

1 July 2013

Relevant facts and circumstances

A is connected to Trust One.

A, along with their affiliates control Trust One.

Trust One acquired properties with Trust Two.

Trust Two is controlled by members of the B Family.

Together the trusts bought X properties.

Trust One owns X% of these properties and Trust Two owns X% of these properties.

The rental income from these properties is returned under a partnership income tax return known as The Partnership.

Trust Two has significantly more financial resources available to it through the B family and as a consequence is the dominate owners and decision maker in respect of the properties.

All decisions regarding the management of the rental properties are based on the percentage of ownership.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 328-125

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 328-125(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 328-125(6)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 328-130

Reasons for decision

The meaning of a connected entity is defined under section 328-125 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) which states as follows:

Direct control of a company

Subsection 328-125(2) of the ITAA 1997 provides that an entity controls a company if the entity, its affiliates, or the entity together with its affiliates beneficially own:

An affiliate is an individual or a company that, in relation to their business affairs, acts or could be reasonably expected to act in accordance with your directions or in concert with you (section 328-130 of the ITAA 1997). A trust, partnership or superannuation fund cannot be an affiliate.

Commissioner may determine that an entity does not control another entity

The Commissioner's discretion, as set out in subsection 328-125(6) of the ITAA 1997 states the following:

The Advanced Guide to Capital Gains Tax Concessions for Small Business 2012-2013 NAT 3359 (Advanced Guide) discusses the application of the discretion contained in subsection 328-125(6) of the ITAA 1997.

The Advanced Guide provides that for the Commissioner to be able to consider the discretion in subsection 328-125(6) of the ITAA 1997 there must be a single, identifiable third entity that has a control percentage of at least 40% of the company. In working out the third entity's control percentage, the interests of any affiliates of the third entity are taken into account. The third entity must control the company in the way described in subsection 328-125(2) of the ITAA 1997. Unless the conditions of subsection 328-125(2) of the ITAA 1997 are met by a third entity, the Commissioner cannot determine that the first entity does not control the company.

If there was a third entity with a control percentage of 40% or more it would then be necessary to consider additional factors such as who is responsible for the day to day and strategic running of the company to determine if the third entity controls it. It is possible that both of the entities having a control percentage of at least 40% may control the company if such responsibilities are shared.

Application to your circumstances

In this case, the remaining shareholder, Trust Two, holds a X% interest in The Partnership. All the decisions regarding the management of the properties are based on the percentage of ownership. As Trust Two owns X% of the partnership they control the partnership. Accordingly, the Commissioner will exercise the discretion contained in subsection 328-125(6) of the ITAA 1997.

As the Commissioner has exercised the discretion under subsection 328-125(6) of the ITAA 1997, Trust One does not control The Partnership. Therefore, when calculating their maximum net asset value, A will only include Trust One's ownership percentage of the partnerships assets and liabilities.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).