Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1012813456623

Ruling

Subject: Travel between home and work

Question

Are you entitled to a deduction for travel between home and work?

Answer

No.

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ended 30 June 2015

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2014

Relevant facts

You are an employee and you travel between your home and one of your employer's workplaces. During the work day you also travel to external sites to visit clients.

You generally travel from home to one of your employer's workplaces and finish your work day at a workplace before returning home.

You are required to carry a piece of equipment with you when you are working at your employer's workplaces. It is not a requirement that you have it with you when you are visiting your clients at external sites.

The piece of equipment weighs 3.9 kg and measures 33cm X 27cm X 14cm.

You also carry a laptop computer and client files.

The combined weight of all items carried is 8.5 kg and fit in a bag that measures 48cm X 28cm X 38cm.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1

Reasons for decision

Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 deals with general deductions and allows a deduction for all losses or outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income, except to the extent that they are outgoings of a capital, private or domestic nature.

Generally the expenses of travel to and from work are not deductible. This is either because such expenditure is private in nature, or because it is not an expense incurred in gaining or producing assessable income.

The case of Lunney & Hayley v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1958) 100 CLR 478; (1958) 7 AITR 166; (1958) 11 ATD 404 settled the principle that travel to and from work is ordinarily not deductible. The Full High Court held that costs incurred by a taxpayer in travelling to the place where they work are expenses incurred in order to enable them to earn income but are not expenses incurred in the course of earning that income. The travel is considered to be of an essentially private or domestic nature.

However, the Commissioner accepts that expenses incurred by employees in travelling to and from work are deductible in certain circumstances. One of the exceptions to the general view is where the employee is required to transport bulky equipment necessary for employment. Paragraphs 63 and 64 of Taxation Ruling TR 95/34 explain that a deduction may be allowed in circumstances where:

The question of what constitutes bulky equipment must be considered according to the individual circumstances in each case. To establish if the equipment you carry is bulky, consideration must be given to its size and weight. 

In Crestani v. FC of T 98 ATC 2219; (1998) 40 ATR 1037 (Crestani's Case), a toolbox which measured 57 x 28 x 25 centimetres and weighed 27 kilograms was considered as bulky, in the sense of cumbersome, and the transport cost was attributable to the transportation of such bulky equipment rather than private travel between home and work. The employer did not provide a secure storage area for the toolbox.

In Case 43/94 94 ATC 387; AAT Case 9654 (1994) 29 ATR 1031, the taxpayer, a flight sergeant with the Royal Australian Air force, was denied a deduction for the cost of transporting items required to and from work in a duffle bag, a briefcase sized navigational bag and on occasions a suit bag. The duffle bag when packed weighed 20 kilograms and measured 75cm long, 55 cm wide and 50 cm deep. The suit bag weighed 10 kilograms. It was considered that the duffle bag was not of sufficient size or weight to impede facile transport. 

In your case, you are required to carry work items which weigh approximately 8.5 kg.

Your situation is comparable with Case 43/94, and likewise, your equipment is not of sufficient size or weight to impede facile transport.

Therefore, you are not entitled to a deduction for travel expenses between home and work.

Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).